The role of the intraparietal sulcus in numeracy: A review of parietal lesion cases

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioural Brain Research Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115453
Erin Duricy , Corrine Durisko , Julie A. Fiez
{"title":"The role of the intraparietal sulcus in numeracy: A review of parietal lesion cases","authors":"Erin Duricy ,&nbsp;Corrine Durisko ,&nbsp;Julie A. Fiez","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prominent theories of numeracy link the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) to approximate representations of quantity that undergird basic math abilities. The goal of this review is to better understand the neural basis of mathematical cognition through the lens of acalculia, by identifying numeracy-focused single case studies of patients with parietal lesions and testing for causal relationships between numeracy impairments and the locus of parietal damage. A systematic literature review identified 27 single case studies with left parietal lesions and categorized administered tasks across four numeracy domains: Approximation, Calculation, Ordinality/Cardinality, and Transcoding. We compared published lesion images by drawing a sphere at the inferred center-of-mass and assigning each case to an anatomical group (IPS or Other Parietal damage) based on overlap with left IPS and original anatomical description. We performed Fisher’s Exact Test to compare behavioral performance on each numeracy domain between the two groups. As an exploratory follow-up, we used Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) to identify sites of damage within parietal cortex preferentially associated with impairments in each domain. We found that Approximation impairments were significantly more frequent in the IPS group (p = .003). The exploratory ALE analysis revealed that only Approximation impairment cases significantly overlapped with the IPS, while impairments in other domains were localized to different regions of the parietal lobe. Based on the pattern of impairments shown across these cases, we conclude that damage to the left IPS is linked to impairments in approximation ability specifically. Our findings support theoretical claims linking IPS to magnitude representation, but do not provide evidence that IPS critically underpins performance across all numeracy tasks. Instead, our findings are more compatible with models of dissociable circuits of numerical processing within the parietal lobe.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":"482 ","pages":"Article 115453"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432825000397","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prominent theories of numeracy link the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) to approximate representations of quantity that undergird basic math abilities. The goal of this review is to better understand the neural basis of mathematical cognition through the lens of acalculia, by identifying numeracy-focused single case studies of patients with parietal lesions and testing for causal relationships between numeracy impairments and the locus of parietal damage. A systematic literature review identified 27 single case studies with left parietal lesions and categorized administered tasks across four numeracy domains: Approximation, Calculation, Ordinality/Cardinality, and Transcoding. We compared published lesion images by drawing a sphere at the inferred center-of-mass and assigning each case to an anatomical group (IPS or Other Parietal damage) based on overlap with left IPS and original anatomical description. We performed Fisher’s Exact Test to compare behavioral performance on each numeracy domain between the two groups. As an exploratory follow-up, we used Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) to identify sites of damage within parietal cortex preferentially associated with impairments in each domain. We found that Approximation impairments were significantly more frequent in the IPS group (p = .003). The exploratory ALE analysis revealed that only Approximation impairment cases significantly overlapped with the IPS, while impairments in other domains were localized to different regions of the parietal lobe. Based on the pattern of impairments shown across these cases, we conclude that damage to the left IPS is linked to impairments in approximation ability specifically. Our findings support theoretical claims linking IPS to magnitude representation, but do not provide evidence that IPS critically underpins performance across all numeracy tasks. Instead, our findings are more compatible with models of dissociable circuits of numerical processing within the parietal lobe.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
著名的计算理论将顶内沟(IPS)与支撑基本数学能力的数量近似表征联系起来。本综述的目的是通过对顶叶损伤患者进行以运算能力为重点的单个病例研究,并检验运算能力损伤与顶叶损伤部位之间的因果关系,从而从微积分学的角度更好地理解数学认知的神经基础。一项系统性文献综述确定了 27 个左顶叶病变的单一病例研究,并对四个计算领域的任务进行了分类:近似、计算、顺序/心算和转码。我们通过在推断的质量中心画一个球形来比较已发表的病变图像,并根据与左顶叶重叠情况和原始解剖描述将每个病例归入一个解剖学组(IPS 或其他顶叶损伤)。我们进行了费雪精确检验,以比较两组患者在每个算术领域的行为表现。作为一项探索性的后续研究,我们使用激活似然估计法(ALE)来确定顶叶皮层中与各领域障碍优先相关的损伤部位。我们发现,在 IPS 组中,接近障碍的发生率明显更高(P =.003)。探索性 ALE 分析显示,只有逼近障碍的病例与 IPS 有明显重叠,而其他领域的障碍则分布在顶叶的不同区域。根据这些病例所显示的损伤模式,我们得出结论,左侧 IPS 的损伤与近似能力的损伤特别相关。我们的研究结果支持将 IPS 与幅度表征联系起来的理论主张,但并没有提供证据证明 IPS 对所有算术任务的表现都起着关键作用。相反,我们的研究结果更符合顶叶内可分离的数字处理回路模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
期刊最新文献
Muscarinic cholinergic system of the dorsal hippocampus involvement in the modulation of formalin-induced orofacial nociception and relevant memory impairment in rats Identification of Prolyl endopeptidase as a novel anti-depression target of Genipin-1-b-D-gentiobioside in brain tissues CRMP2 in the hippocampus alleviates chronic stress-induced depressive-like behaviours in mice by affecting synaptic function Unlocking the therapeutic promise of miRNAs in promoting amyloid-β clearance for Alzheimer's disease The study on effects of acute exposure to high altitude hypoxia on cognitive function in lowlander
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1