The Diagnostic Accuracy of Using Borderline High Office Blood Pressure Thresholds to Diagnose Masked Hypertension According to the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE American Journal of Hypertension Pub Date : 2025-04-15 DOI:10.1093/ajh/hpaf017
Sophie Walsh, Eunhee Choi, Chloe Fang, Keisuke Narita, Maria Cepeda, Brulinda Frangaj, Sofia Kim, Yaniris Mercado, Riley Nesheim-Case, Uriel Alvira Ramirez, Matthew Barrett, Joseph E Schwartz, Daichi Shimbo
{"title":"The Diagnostic Accuracy of Using Borderline High Office Blood Pressure Thresholds to Diagnose Masked Hypertension According to the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline.","authors":"Sophie Walsh, Eunhee Choi, Chloe Fang, Keisuke Narita, Maria Cepeda, Brulinda Frangaj, Sofia Kim, Yaniris Mercado, Riley Nesheim-Case, Uriel Alvira Ramirez, Matthew Barrett, Joseph E Schwartz, Daichi Shimbo","doi":"10.1093/ajh/hpaf017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) BP guideline recommends ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) for diagnosing masked hypertension among adults not taking antihypertensive medication with borderline office BP (i.e., office systolic BP [SBP] 120 to < 130 mm Hg or diastolic BP [DBP] 75 to < 80 mm Hg).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Improving the Detection of Hypertension Study, sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios for a positive and negative test of having borderline office BP (i.e., office SBP 120 to < 130 mm Hg or DBP 75 to < 80 mm Hg) for diagnosing masked hypertension (i.e., mean awake SBP ≥ 130 mm Hg or mean awake DBP ≥ 80 mm Hg) were determined among 263 participants who had a mean office SBP < 130 mm Hg and mean DBP < 80 mm Hg. Likelihood ratios for a positive test > 10, 5-10, and < 5 were considered strong, moderate, and weak, respectively. Likelihood ratios for a negative test < 0.1, 0.1-0.2, and > 0.2 were considered strong, moderate, and weak, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 263 participants, mean ± SD age was 39.2 ± 12.8 years, 62.4% were female, 38.4% had borderline office BP, and 26.2% had masked hypertension. SN, SP, PPV, and NPV were 0.754, 0.747, 0.515, and 0.895, respectively. The likelihood ratios for a positive and negative test were 2.984 (weak) and 0.330 (weak), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of borderline office BP thresholds recommended in the 2017 ACC/AHA BP guideline did not sufficiently rule in or rule out masked hypertension.</p>","PeriodicalId":7578,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":"288-294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11997242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) BP guideline recommends ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) for diagnosing masked hypertension among adults not taking antihypertensive medication with borderline office BP (i.e., office systolic BP [SBP] 120 to < 130 mm Hg or diastolic BP [DBP] 75 to < 80 mm Hg).

Methods: Using data from the Improving the Detection of Hypertension Study, sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios for a positive and negative test of having borderline office BP (i.e., office SBP 120 to < 130 mm Hg or DBP 75 to < 80 mm Hg) for diagnosing masked hypertension (i.e., mean awake SBP ≥ 130 mm Hg or mean awake DBP ≥ 80 mm Hg) were determined among 263 participants who had a mean office SBP < 130 mm Hg and mean DBP < 80 mm Hg. Likelihood ratios for a positive test > 10, 5-10, and < 5 were considered strong, moderate, and weak, respectively. Likelihood ratios for a negative test < 0.1, 0.1-0.2, and > 0.2 were considered strong, moderate, and weak, respectively.

Results: Among the 263 participants, mean ± SD age was 39.2 ± 12.8 years, 62.4% were female, 38.4% had borderline office BP, and 26.2% had masked hypertension. SN, SP, PPV, and NPV were 0.754, 0.747, 0.515, and 0.895, respectively. The likelihood ratios for a positive and negative test were 2.984 (weak) and 0.330 (weak), respectively.

Conclusions: The use of borderline office BP thresholds recommended in the 2017 ACC/AHA BP guideline did not sufficiently rule in or rule out masked hypertension.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据2017年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会血压指南,使用边界高压阈值诊断隐匿性高血压的诊断准确性
背景:2017年美国心脏病学会(ACC)/美国心脏协会(AHA)血压指南推荐,在未服用降压药且血压(即收缩压[SBP] 120)处于边界的成年人中,动态血压监测(ABPM)可用于诊断隐蔽性高血压。根据改善高血压检测研究的数据,敏感性(SN)、特异性(SP)、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和检出边缘性办公室血压(即办公室血压120 ~ 10、5 ~ 10和0.2)的阳性和阴性的似然比分别被认为是强、中等和弱。结果:263例患者中,平均±SD年龄为39.2±12.8岁,62.4%为女性,38.4%为边缘性血压,26.2%为隐匿性高血压。SN、SP、PPV和NPV分别为0.754、0.747、0.515和0.895。阳性和阴性的似然比分别为2.984(弱)和0.330(弱)。结论:使用2017年ACC/AHA血压指南中推荐的边缘性血压阈值不足以排除隐蔽性高血压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Hypertension
American Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Hypertension is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scientific inquiry of the highest standards in the field of hypertension and related cardiovascular disease. The journal publishes high-quality original research and review articles on basic sciences, molecular biology, clinical and experimental hypertension, cardiology, epidemiology, pediatric hypertension, endocrinology, neurophysiology, and nephrology.
期刊最新文献
Reducing Clinical Inertia in Hypertension Through Primary Care Practitioner-Led Remote Patient Monitoring. Trends in Initial Combination Antihypertensive Therapy in a US Health System. Restless Legs, Relentless Pressure: The Non-Dipping Pattern in Restless Legs Syndrome Beyond Shared Comorbidities. Association of Non-Insulin-Based Markers of Insulin Resistance with Hypertension in Type 2 Diabetes: An Age- and Gender-Matched Cross-Sectional Study. Hypertension Medication Changes in Patients Prescribed Remote Monitoring.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1