American Journal of Hypertension最新文献

Background: Arterial hypertension is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Although central blood pressure (BP) evaluation is considered the gold standard, the reliability of non-invasive measurements remains unclear. Therefore, we compared the predictive value of invasively measured central BP with non-invasively measured brachial BP and analyzed pulse pressure (PP) amplification (delta-PP; difference between central and peripheral PP) as an independent predictor of mortality.

Methods: We analyzed systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), mean arterial BP (MAP), PP and delta-PP as predictors of CV and all-cause mortality in the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health (LURIC) study, involving 3316 patients referred for coronary angiography.

Results: All brachial BP parameters, except DBP, were significantly linked to all-cause and CV mortality in a univariate analysis. A 10 mmHg increase in SBP, MAP, and PP corresponded to increased risks of all-cause (11%, 10%, and 19%) and CV mortality (11%, 11%, and 18%). Central SBP and PP showed similar, but numerically weaker, associations with increased risks of all-cause (5% and 10%) and CV mortality (4% and 8%).After adjusting for age, sex, BMI, diabetes mellitus, and eGFR, only delta-PP independently predicted mortality with a 10 mmHg increase linked to a 4% reduction in all-cause and 6% reduction in CV mortality.

Conclusions: Neither brachial nor centrally measured BP parameters were independent mortality predictors in contrast to PP amplification, which remained an independent predictor of mortality in multivariate analysis, in a cohort with a medium to high CV risk profile. As PP amplification decreased, mortality increased.

Background: Hypertension and cancer are both increasing with age. Recently, the new concept of "Onco-Hypertension" has been proposed to address the mutual risks posed by hypertension and cancer and to provide comprehensive care for patients with these two conditions in an aging society.

Methods: In this review, we provide an overview of the current status and future perspective of the "Onco-Hypertension," including our research findings.

Results: Hypertension and cancer share common risk factors and may be interrelated in pathogenesis: Hypertension is involved in the development of certain cancers, and cancer survivors have a higher incidence of hypertension. With recent advances in cancer therapy, the number of cancer survivors has increased. Cancer survivors not only have a higher risk of incident hypertension but also an increased risk of future cardiovascular events, highlighting the growing importance of comprehensive care.

Conclusions: There exists a diverse array of epidemiological and pathophysiological relationships between hypertension and cancer. It is imperative to move the emerging scientific field of "Onco-Hypertension" forward through relentless research efforts.

Background: This study aimed to investigate whether higher cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) can modify the trend of age-related rise in arterial stiffness in individuals with and without hypertension (HTN) or diabetes.

Methods: The study included 4,935 participants who underwent maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing with respiratory gas analysis in a health screening program. CRF was directly measured using peak oxygen uptake during the cardiopulmonary exercise test, while arterial stiffness was evaluated using brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV).

Results: Participants with high CRF levels had significantly lower baPWV compared with those with low CRF levels, regardless of HTN or diabetes status (P < 0.05). The trend of baPWV increased with age, but the rate of age-related increase in baPWV was lower in individuals with moderate-to-high CRF levels compared with those with low CRF levels, regardless of HTN or diabetes status. Joint association analysis indicated that the trend of age-related increase in baPWV was the lowest in fit individuals without HTN or diabetes compared with unfit individuals with HTN or diabetes (P < 0.01). However, the trend of age-related increase in baPWV was not attenuated in fit with HTN or diabetes compared with unfit with HTN or diabetes.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that higher CRF levels may mitigate the trend of age-related rise in arterial stiffness in individuals with and without HTN or diabetes. However, this attenuating trend appears more pronounced in individuals without HTN or diabetes.

Background: Studying the association between blood pressure (BP) trajectories during young adulthood and subsequent cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk can provide insights into how long-term BP patterns in early-life influence the development of CVD later in life.

Methods: We pooled data from 2 US cohorts (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults, Framingham Heart Study). We used latent growth curve models to identify distinct BP trajectory groups between ages 18 and 39 years. We then used Cox proportional hazards models to assess the associations between BP trajectories and CVD events (composite of coronary heart disease [CHD], stroke, and heart failure [HF]) after age 40 years.

Results: We included 6,579 participants and identified 4 distinct systolic BP (SBP) trajectory groups during young adulthood. During a median follow-up of 18.2 years after age 40 years, 213 CHD, 139 stroke, 120 HF, and 400 composite CVD events occurred. Individuals in an elevated-increasing vs. low-stable SBP trajectory during young adulthood were associated with a higher risk of CVD after adjusting for traditional CVD risk factors, with hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of 3.25 (1.63, 6.46) for CHD, 3.92 (1.63, 9.43) for stroke, 8.30 (2.97, 23.17) for HF, and 3.91 (2.38, 6.41) for composite CVD outcomes. Adding BP trajectory to BP at baseline improved model discrimination for all outcomes (changes in Harrell's C-index 0.0084-0.0192).

Conclusions: An elevated-increasing BP trajectory during young adulthood is associated with a higher risk of CVD later in life, highlighting the importance of maintaining a low-stable BP trajectory throughout the young adulthood period for prevention of CVD in later life.

Background: Increased aortic blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness are associated with higher cardiovascular risk in hemodialysis. Previous works showed that lower dialysate sodium is associated with lower brachial-BP; data on aortic-BP and arterial stiffness are limited. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different dialysate sodium concentrations on 72-hour aortic-BP and arterial stiffness parameters in hemodialysis patients.

Methods: This analysis is part of a prospective, non-randomized interventional study. Twenty-five hemodialysis patients underwent a set of 3 periods of different dialysate sodium concentrations; 6 sessions with dialysate sodium of 137 mEq/l, followed consecutively by 6 sessions with 139 mEq/l and, finally, 6 sessions with 141 mEq/l. At the start of the sixth hemodialysis session on each sodium concentration, 72-hour ABPM (Mobil-O-Graph) was performed to evaluate aortic-BP and arterial stiffness indices during the overall 72-hour, different 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime periods.

Results: Mean 72-hour aortic systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were higher with increasing dialysate sodium concentrations (137 mEq/l: 114.2 ± 15.3/77.0 ± 11.8 mm Hg vs. 139 mEq/l: 115.4 ± 17.3/77.9 ± 14.0 mm Hg vs. 141 mEq/l: 120.5 ± 18.4/80.5 ± 14.7 mm Hg, P = 0.002/P = 0.057, respectively). Wave-reflection parameters (AIx, AIx(75), AP) were not significantly different between the 3 dialysate sodium concentrations. Ambulatory pulse wave velocity (PWV) was significantly higher with increasing dialysate sodium concentrations (137 mEq/l: 8.5 ± 1.7 m/s vs. 139 mEq/l: 8.6 ± 1.6 m/s vs. 141 mEq/l: 8.8 ± 1.6 m/s, P < 0.001). In generalized linear mixed models including 72-hour brachial SBP as a random covariate, the adjusted marginal means of 72-hour PWV were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusions: This study showed that higher dialysate sodium concentrations are associated with significant increases in ambulatory aortic BP and PWV. These findings further support the need for modification of dialysate sodium concentration in hemodialysis.

Background: Exaggerated blood pressure response (EBPR) to exercise stress testing (EST) may be a marker of future hypertension and carry valuable information for the prediction of cardiovascular events. We sought to evaluate the clinical and resting EST parameters associated with an increased likelihood of EBPR.

Methods: The records of 14,073 patients (mean age: 55 ± 11 years) without known cardiovascular disease who underwent a treadmill EST were analyzed.

Results: The overall prevalence of arterial hypertension was 44%. A considerable proportion (24%) of patients exhibited EBPR. Multivariate analysis of the entire study population showed that middle-aged individuals (40-60 years old), resting systolic BP > 130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP > 80 mmHg, known arterial hypertension, current cigarette smoking, and family history of premature coronary artery disease are all independent risk factors for EBPR (all P < 0.001). Although the presence of arterial hypertension increased the likelihood of EBPR in the analysis of the entire population, the relevant association in subjects above 60 years old is statistically nonsignificant (P = 0.120). Notably, the pre-test systolic BP > 130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP > 80 mmHg level increased significantly the likelihood of manifesting EBPR in all age categories (<40, 40-60, and >60 years old) independent of hypertension presence and in all hypertensive patients independently of antihypertensive treatment intake (all P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Considering the diagnostic and prognostic utility of EBPR during treadmill EST the clinical and resting hemodynamic parameters that increase the likelihood of EBPR are targets for interventions and preventive measures to modify lifestyle risk behaviors and reduce hypertension and cardiovascular risk factors in the early stages.

Background: The use of correctly sized blood pressure (BP) cuffs is important to ensure accurate measurement and effective management of hypertension. The goals of this study were to determine the proportions of pregnant women that would require small, adult, large, and extra-large (XL) cuff sizes, and to examine the demographic characteristics associated with need for a large or XL cuff.

Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed 1,176 pregnant women (≥18 years) included in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2006 cycles. Recommended BP cuff sizes, based on American Heart Association recommendations, were categorized by mid-arm circumference: small adult (≤26 cm), adult (>26 to ≤34 cm), large (>34 to ≤44 cm), and extra-large (XL) (>44 cm).

Results: Among US pregnant women, recommended cuff sizes were: 17.9% small adult, 57.0% adult, and 25.1% for large or XL. About 38.5% of non-Hispanic Black, 21.6% of Mexican American and 21.0% of non-Hispanic White pregnant women required a large or XL cuff. About 81.8% of women in the highest quartile for BMI required large or XL cuffs, which was significantly higher than women in other quartiles.

Conclusion: Roughly one out of every four pregnant women required large or XL BP cuffs. The requirement for large or XL cuffs was highest among non-Hispanic Black women and women with the highest BMI. For pregnant women, measuring the arm circumference and selecting an appropriately sized cuff is important to facilitate accurate blood pressure monitoring and hypertension management.