In Search of “Fertile Ground”: How Territorial Characteristics Influence the Social Acceptability of Renewable Energy Projects

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1007/s00267-025-02113-5
Hugo Delcayre, Sébastien Bourdin
{"title":"In Search of “Fertile Ground”: How Territorial Characteristics Influence the Social Acceptability of Renewable Energy Projects","authors":"Hugo Delcayre,&nbsp;Sébastien Bourdin","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02113-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Renewable energy (RE) projects are vital to achieving sustainable development in the context of the pressing challenges of climate change and the energy transition. However, despite the global consensus on their importance, RE projects often encounter significant resistance at the local level. This article investigates how territorial characteristics influence the social acceptability of RE projects and explores the concept of fertile ground as a framework for understanding the conditions that foster or hinder local support for such projects. Drawing on theories of regional path dependency and leadership agency, we identify the historical, socioeconomic, cultural and governance factors shaping local attitudes towards RE projects. By employing qualitative methods, including semi-structured interviews with diverse stakeholders and the analysis of press articles, we develop a nuanced approach that incorporates key territorial dynamics. Our findings reveal the critical role of historical industrial conflicts, political leadership, place attachment and perceptions of fairness in shaping local acceptability. They also highlight the influence of habituation and saturation effects, which shows that the acceptability of RE projects is not static; rather, it evolves over time in response to local conditions and stakeholder engagement. By situating the fertile ground concept within broader frameworks of social acceptability, this study provides actionable insights to policymakers and project developers seeking to align RE initiatives with local contexts and values.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":"75 4","pages":"867 - 882"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00267-025-02113-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-025-02113-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Renewable energy (RE) projects are vital to achieving sustainable development in the context of the pressing challenges of climate change and the energy transition. However, despite the global consensus on their importance, RE projects often encounter significant resistance at the local level. This article investigates how territorial characteristics influence the social acceptability of RE projects and explores the concept of fertile ground as a framework for understanding the conditions that foster or hinder local support for such projects. Drawing on theories of regional path dependency and leadership agency, we identify the historical, socioeconomic, cultural and governance factors shaping local attitudes towards RE projects. By employing qualitative methods, including semi-structured interviews with diverse stakeholders and the analysis of press articles, we develop a nuanced approach that incorporates key territorial dynamics. Our findings reveal the critical role of historical industrial conflicts, political leadership, place attachment and perceptions of fairness in shaping local acceptability. They also highlight the influence of habituation and saturation effects, which shows that the acceptability of RE projects is not static; rather, it evolves over time in response to local conditions and stakeholder engagement. By situating the fertile ground concept within broader frameworks of social acceptability, this study provides actionable insights to policymakers and project developers seeking to align RE initiatives with local contexts and values.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻找“沃土”:地域特征如何影响可再生能源项目的社会可接受性。
在气候变化和能源转型的紧迫挑战背景下,可再生能源项目对实现可持续发展至关重要。然而,尽管全球对可再生能源的重要性达成共识,但可再生能源项目往往在地方一级遇到重大阻力。本文研究了地域特征如何影响可再生能源项目的社会可接受性,并探讨了肥沃土地的概念,作为理解促进或阻碍当地支持此类项目的条件的框架。根据区域路径依赖和领导机构理论,我们确定了影响当地对可再生能源项目态度的历史、社会经济、文化和治理因素。通过采用定性方法,包括与不同利益相关者的半结构化访谈和对新闻文章的分析,我们开发了一种结合关键地域动态的细致入微的方法。我们的研究结果揭示了历史产业冲突、政治领导、地方依恋和公平感在塑造当地可接受性方面的关键作用。他们还强调了习惯效应和饱和效应的影响,这表明可再生能源项目的可接受性不是静态的;相反,随着时间的推移,它会根据当地情况和利益相关者的参与而发展。通过将沃土概念置于更广泛的社会可接受性框架中,本研究为寻求将可再生能源倡议与当地环境和价值观相结合的政策制定者和项目开发商提供了可行的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive Strategies for Reclamation of Soil Condition Affected by Coal Bed Methane Co-Produced Water Integrating Sentiment Analysis and Thematic Analysis to Measure and Contextualise Human Emotions Towards Asiatic Black Bears in Darjeeling Himalaya Investigating Environmental Features and Network Interdependencies in Network Formation: A Study of Collaborative, Community-Based Watershed Restoration Assessing Port-related Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mitigation Pathways Through a Comprehensive Framework Applied to the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority Participatory Scenario Design to Support Ex-ante Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Assessments in Four European Agricultural Case Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1