{"title":"Efficacy of PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy in patients with oncogenic-driven non-small-cell lung cancer.","authors":"Haowei Wang, Lei Cheng, Jian Chen, Peixin Chen, Zhuoran Tang, Qianyi Wang, Ying Ma, Chao Zhao, Xuefei Li, Tao Jiang, Fei Zhou, Xiaoxia Chen, Caicun Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s00262-024-03937-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy has become the first-line standard of care for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without oncogenic drivers. Oncogenic-driven advanced NSCLC showed limited response to PD-1 blockade monotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Whether NSCLC patients with oncogenic drivers could benefit from PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy remains undetermined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three hundred twelve NSCLC patients with at least one oncogenic driver alteration received PD-1 plus chemotherapy or each monotherapy were retrospectively identified. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes differences among patients with different oncogenic drivers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixty-two patients received PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy, 57 received PD-1 blockade monotherapy and 93 received chemotherapy alone were included. Oncogenic driver mutations including KRAS (31.4%), EGFR (28.8%), HER2 (14.7%), BRAF (10.6%), RET (7.4%), and other mutations (7.1%) were identified. Patients with oncogenic drivers who received PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy had significantly better outcomes compared to those received PD-1 blockade or chemotherapy alone (ORR: 51% vs. 18% vs. 25%, P < 0.001; median PFS: 10.0 [95% CI: 8.9-12.6] vs. 3.7 [95% CI: 2.9-5.1] vs. 5.3 [95% CI: 4.5-6.2] months, P < 0.001; median OS: 26.0 [95% CI: 23.0-30.0] vs. 14.3 [95% CI: 9.6-19.8] vs. 16.1 [95% CI: 11.6-21.9] months, P < 0.001). The superior efficacy was consistently found in separate analyses for patients received first-line and second/third line treatments. Among individual gene alterations, patients with KRAS, EGFR, or BRAF mutations treated with PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy achieved markedly improved PFS and OS than those received PD-1 blockade or chemotherapy alone. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy was independently associated with better PFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy demonstrated superior efficacy than PD-1 blockade monotherapy or chemotherapy alone in patients with oncogenic-driven advanced NSCLC, particularly in KRAS, EGFR and BRAF subgroups. These findings suggest that PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy may be considered as an optional treatment option for patients without available targeted therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9595,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy","volume":"74 3","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-024-03937-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy has become the first-line standard of care for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without oncogenic drivers. Oncogenic-driven advanced NSCLC showed limited response to PD-1 blockade monotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Whether NSCLC patients with oncogenic drivers could benefit from PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy remains undetermined.
Methods: Three hundred twelve NSCLC patients with at least one oncogenic driver alteration received PD-1 plus chemotherapy or each monotherapy were retrospectively identified. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes differences among patients with different oncogenic drivers.
Results: One hundred sixty-two patients received PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy, 57 received PD-1 blockade monotherapy and 93 received chemotherapy alone were included. Oncogenic driver mutations including KRAS (31.4%), EGFR (28.8%), HER2 (14.7%), BRAF (10.6%), RET (7.4%), and other mutations (7.1%) were identified. Patients with oncogenic drivers who received PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy had significantly better outcomes compared to those received PD-1 blockade or chemotherapy alone (ORR: 51% vs. 18% vs. 25%, P < 0.001; median PFS: 10.0 [95% CI: 8.9-12.6] vs. 3.7 [95% CI: 2.9-5.1] vs. 5.3 [95% CI: 4.5-6.2] months, P < 0.001; median OS: 26.0 [95% CI: 23.0-30.0] vs. 14.3 [95% CI: 9.6-19.8] vs. 16.1 [95% CI: 11.6-21.9] months, P < 0.001). The superior efficacy was consistently found in separate analyses for patients received first-line and second/third line treatments. Among individual gene alterations, patients with KRAS, EGFR, or BRAF mutations treated with PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy achieved markedly improved PFS and OS than those received PD-1 blockade or chemotherapy alone. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy was independently associated with better PFS and OS.
Conclusion: PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy demonstrated superior efficacy than PD-1 blockade monotherapy or chemotherapy alone in patients with oncogenic-driven advanced NSCLC, particularly in KRAS, EGFR and BRAF subgroups. These findings suggest that PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy may be considered as an optional treatment option for patients without available targeted therapies.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy has the basic aim of keeping readers informed of the latest research results in the fields of oncology and immunology. As knowledge expands, the scope of the journal has broadened to include more of the progress being made in the areas of biology concerned with biological response modifiers. This helps keep readers up to date on the latest advances in our understanding of tumor-host interactions.
The journal publishes short editorials including "position papers," general reviews, original articles, and short communications, providing a forum for the most current experimental and clinical advances in tumor immunology.