Evolution in the prescription and cost of non-intravenous rescue benzodiazepines for the treatment of seizure emergencies

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1111/epi.18232
Iván Sánchez Fernández, Marta Amengual-Gual, Cristina Barcia Aguilar, Taha Fathima Khan, Marina Gaínza-Lein, Alcy Torres, Jonas Rinat, Laurie Douglass
{"title":"Evolution in the prescription and cost of non-intravenous rescue benzodiazepines for the treatment of seizure emergencies","authors":"Iván Sánchez Fernández,&nbsp;Marta Amengual-Gual,&nbsp;Cristina Barcia Aguilar,&nbsp;Taha Fathima Khan,&nbsp;Marina Gaínza-Lein,&nbsp;Alcy Torres,&nbsp;Jonas Rinat,&nbsp;Laurie Douglass","doi":"10.1111/epi.18232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The proportion of patients with epilepsy who have a non-intravenous rescue benzodiazepine (non-IV-rBZD) available for seizure emergencies is unknown. This study aims to describe prescription patterns from 2006 to 2022, factors associated with prescription, and the impact of recently introduced intranasal benzodiazepines on prescription and cost.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective analysis of the MarketScan Database, a claims database of privately insured patients in the United States.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 213 384 patients (53% female, median (p<sub>25</sub>-p<sub>75</sub>) age: 33 (17–50) years) with epilepsy taking long-term anti-seizure medications with follow-up of 2.62 (1.54–4.73) years, only 30 371 patients (14.2%) had at least one non-IV-rBZD prescription. The proportion of patients with at least one non-IV-rBZD prescription was higher among: (1) younger patients (61.4% in the 0–5 year age group, 44.2% in the 6–12 year age group, 23.9% in the 13–21 year age group, 4.8% in the 22–35 year age group, 1.8% in the 36–50 year age group, 1.3% in the 51–60 year age group, and 1.0% in the older than 60 years age group); (2) patients with refractory epilepsy (24.3% vs 10.9% in non-refractory epilepsy); and (3) patients with more emergency department visits or hospital admissions for epilepsy (7.1% among patients with 0, 19.2% among patients with 1–3, and 31.1% among patients with more than 3). Multivariate analysis confirmed young age, refractory epilepsy, and emergency department visits or hospitalizations for epilepsy as strong independent predictors of having at least one non-IV-rBZD prescription. Prescriptions for intranasal midazolam and intranasal diazepam have increased rapidly; they had moderately increased the overall proportion of patients with a non-IV-rBZD prescription, whereas the inflation-adjusted cost of non-IV-rBZDs has markedly increased.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>The vast majority of patients with epilepsy have not filled a prescription for non-IV-rBZDs. Seizure emergency readiness can be markedly improved, especially among adults. The cost of non-IV-rBZDs has increased with intranasal rescue medications.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":"66 3","pages":"648-661"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.18232","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The proportion of patients with epilepsy who have a non-intravenous rescue benzodiazepine (non-IV-rBZD) available for seizure emergencies is unknown. This study aims to describe prescription patterns from 2006 to 2022, factors associated with prescription, and the impact of recently introduced intranasal benzodiazepines on prescription and cost.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of the MarketScan Database, a claims database of privately insured patients in the United States.

Results

Among 213 384 patients (53% female, median (p25-p75) age: 33 (17–50) years) with epilepsy taking long-term anti-seizure medications with follow-up of 2.62 (1.54–4.73) years, only 30 371 patients (14.2%) had at least one non-IV-rBZD prescription. The proportion of patients with at least one non-IV-rBZD prescription was higher among: (1) younger patients (61.4% in the 0–5 year age group, 44.2% in the 6–12 year age group, 23.9% in the 13–21 year age group, 4.8% in the 22–35 year age group, 1.8% in the 36–50 year age group, 1.3% in the 51–60 year age group, and 1.0% in the older than 60 years age group); (2) patients with refractory epilepsy (24.3% vs 10.9% in non-refractory epilepsy); and (3) patients with more emergency department visits or hospital admissions for epilepsy (7.1% among patients with 0, 19.2% among patients with 1–3, and 31.1% among patients with more than 3). Multivariate analysis confirmed young age, refractory epilepsy, and emergency department visits or hospitalizations for epilepsy as strong independent predictors of having at least one non-IV-rBZD prescription. Prescriptions for intranasal midazolam and intranasal diazepam have increased rapidly; they had moderately increased the overall proportion of patients with a non-IV-rBZD prescription, whereas the inflation-adjusted cost of non-IV-rBZDs has markedly increased.

Significance

The vast majority of patients with epilepsy have not filled a prescription for non-IV-rBZDs. Seizure emergency readiness can be markedly improved, especially among adults. The cost of non-IV-rBZDs has increased with intranasal rescue medications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非静脉抢救苯二氮卓类药物治疗癫痫突发事件的处方和成本的演变。
目的:癫痫患者使用非静脉救援苯二氮卓类药物(非iv - rbzd)治疗突发癫痫发作的比例尚不清楚。本研究旨在描述2006年至2022年的处方模式,处方相关因素,以及最近引入的鼻内苯二氮卓类药物对处方和成本的影响。方法:回顾性分析MarketScan数据库,一个美国私人保险患者的索赔数据库。结果:在213384例长期服用抗癫痫药物的癫痫患者中(53%为女性,中位年龄(p25-p75): 33(17-50)岁,随访2.62(1.54-4.73)年,仅有30371例(14.2%)患者至少服用过一次非iv - rbzd处方。至少有一种非iv - rbzd处方的患者比例在以下年龄组中较高:(1)年轻患者(0-5岁年龄组61.4%,6-12岁年龄组44.2%,13-21岁年龄组23.9%,22-35岁年龄组4.8%,36-50岁年龄组1.8%,51-60岁年龄组1.3%,60岁以上年龄组1.0%);(2)难治性癫痫患者(24.3% vs非难治性癫痫患者10.9%);(3)癫痫急诊科就诊或住院次数较多的患者(0岁患者占7.1%,1-3岁患者占19.2%,3岁以上患者占31.1%)。多因素分析证实,年龄小、难治性癫痫和癫痫急诊科就诊或住院是至少开具一种非iv - rbzd处方的强独立预测因素。鼻用咪达唑仑和鼻用地西泮的处方迅速增加;他们适度增加了非iv类rbzd处方患者的总体比例,而非iv类rbzd经通胀调整后的成本却显著增加。意义:绝大多数癫痫患者没有处方非iv - rbzds。癫痫应急准备可以显著提高,特别是在成人中。非iv - rbzds的费用随着鼻内抢救药物的使用而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
期刊最新文献
Validation of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Risk of Bias Tool against the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale in epilepsy research. Genetic testing for familial epilepsies: Diagnostic yield and genetic findings. Open diffusion magnetic resonance imaging and connectivity data for epilepsy and surgery: The IDEAS II release. Executive dysfunction and employment in epilepsy. Response: Temporal encephalocele and epileptogenesis-Reflections of MRI metrics of brain parenchymal tethering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1