{"title":"Drug-induced nasal septum perforation: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system database.","authors":"Chubo Xie, Yi Cui, Suizi Zhou, Fang Sun, Zhilin Jiang, Keshuang Wang, Yitong Liu, Yuewu Wang, Qianhui Qiu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2460448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nasal septum perforation represents a significant clinical concern, with limited investigations into the role of medications in its etiology. This study utilizes the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to identify the drugs associated with nasal septum perforation and assess their risk.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective pharmacovigilance study analyzed drug-induced nasal septum perforation data from January 2004 to December 2023. Disproportionality analysis using reporting odds ratio (ROR) assessed drug associations with nasal septum perforation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 552 identified cases, the most commonly reported drugs were bevacizumab (<i>n</i> = 56), fluticasone propionate (<i>n</i> = 50), methotrexate (<i>n</i> = 34), hydrocodone and acetaminophen (<i>n</i> = 22), and paclitaxel (<i>n</i> = 17). Twenty-six drugs showed positive risk signals, with the top five being azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate (ROR = 173.82), beclomethasone dipropionate (ROR = 90.91), oxymetazoline (ROR = 53.77), desmopressin (ROR = 51.43), and leucovorin (ROR = 42.83). Intriguingly, 18 of these drugs did not list nasal septum perforation as a known side effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides a comprehensive overview of drug-induced nasal septum perforation from a pharmacovigilance perspective, highlighting the need for further research to clarify these associations and update drug safety information to reduce patient risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2460448","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Nasal septum perforation represents a significant clinical concern, with limited investigations into the role of medications in its etiology. This study utilizes the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to identify the drugs associated with nasal septum perforation and assess their risk.
Research design and methods: This retrospective pharmacovigilance study analyzed drug-induced nasal septum perforation data from January 2004 to December 2023. Disproportionality analysis using reporting odds ratio (ROR) assessed drug associations with nasal septum perforation.
Results: For 552 identified cases, the most commonly reported drugs were bevacizumab (n = 56), fluticasone propionate (n = 50), methotrexate (n = 34), hydrocodone and acetaminophen (n = 22), and paclitaxel (n = 17). Twenty-six drugs showed positive risk signals, with the top five being azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate (ROR = 173.82), beclomethasone dipropionate (ROR = 90.91), oxymetazoline (ROR = 53.77), desmopressin (ROR = 51.43), and leucovorin (ROR = 42.83). Intriguingly, 18 of these drugs did not list nasal septum perforation as a known side effect.
Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive overview of drug-induced nasal septum perforation from a pharmacovigilance perspective, highlighting the need for further research to clarify these associations and update drug safety information to reduce patient risk.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports.
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.