Drug-induced nasal septum perforation: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system database.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2025.2460448
Chubo Xie, Yi Cui, Suizi Zhou, Fang Sun, Zhilin Jiang, Keshuang Wang, Yitong Liu, Yuewu Wang, Qianhui Qiu
{"title":"Drug-induced nasal septum perforation: a disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system database.","authors":"Chubo Xie, Yi Cui, Suizi Zhou, Fang Sun, Zhilin Jiang, Keshuang Wang, Yitong Liu, Yuewu Wang, Qianhui Qiu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2460448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nasal septum perforation represents a significant clinical concern, with limited investigations into the role of medications in its etiology. This study utilizes the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to identify the drugs associated with nasal septum perforation and assess their risk.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective pharmacovigilance study analyzed drug-induced nasal septum perforation data from January 2004 to December 2023. Disproportionality analysis using reporting odds ratio (ROR) assessed drug associations with nasal septum perforation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 552 identified cases, the most commonly reported drugs were bevacizumab (<i>n</i> = 56), fluticasone propionate (<i>n</i> = 50), methotrexate (<i>n</i> = 34), hydrocodone and acetaminophen (<i>n</i> = 22), and paclitaxel (<i>n</i> = 17). Twenty-six drugs showed positive risk signals, with the top five being azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate (ROR = 173.82), beclomethasone dipropionate (ROR = 90.91), oxymetazoline (ROR = 53.77), desmopressin (ROR = 51.43), and leucovorin (ROR = 42.83). Intriguingly, 18 of these drugs did not list nasal septum perforation as a known side effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides a comprehensive overview of drug-induced nasal septum perforation from a pharmacovigilance perspective, highlighting the need for further research to clarify these associations and update drug safety information to reduce patient risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2460448","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nasal septum perforation represents a significant clinical concern, with limited investigations into the role of medications in its etiology. This study utilizes the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to identify the drugs associated with nasal septum perforation and assess their risk.

Research design and methods: This retrospective pharmacovigilance study analyzed drug-induced nasal septum perforation data from January 2004 to December 2023. Disproportionality analysis using reporting odds ratio (ROR) assessed drug associations with nasal septum perforation.

Results: For 552 identified cases, the most commonly reported drugs were bevacizumab (n = 56), fluticasone propionate (n = 50), methotrexate (n = 34), hydrocodone and acetaminophen (n = 22), and paclitaxel (n = 17). Twenty-six drugs showed positive risk signals, with the top five being azelastine hydrochloride and fluticasone propionate (ROR = 173.82), beclomethasone dipropionate (ROR = 90.91), oxymetazoline (ROR = 53.77), desmopressin (ROR = 51.43), and leucovorin (ROR = 42.83). Intriguingly, 18 of these drugs did not list nasal septum perforation as a known side effect.

Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive overview of drug-induced nasal septum perforation from a pharmacovigilance perspective, highlighting the need for further research to clarify these associations and update drug safety information to reduce patient risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物性鼻中隔穿孔:FDA不良事件报告系统数据库的歧化分析。
背景:鼻中隔穿孔是一个重要的临床问题,对药物在其病因中的作用的研究有限。本研究利用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库识别与鼻中隔穿孔相关的药物并评估其风险。研究设计和方法:本回顾性药物警戒研究分析了2004年1月至2023年12月药物性鼻中隔穿孔的资料。歧化分析采用报告优势比(ROR)评估药物与鼻中隔穿孔的关系。结果:在552例确诊病例中,最常报告的药物是贝伐单抗(n = 56)、丙酸氟替卡松(n = 50)、甲氨蝶呤(n = 34)、氢可酮和对乙酰氨基酚(n = 22)和紫杉醇(n = 17)。26种药物存在阳性风险信号,其中排在前5位的分别是盐酸氮杂松和丙酸氟替卡松(ROR = 173.82)、二丙酸倍氯米松(ROR = 90.91)、羟甲唑啉(ROR = 53.77)、去氨加压素(ROR = 51.43)、亚叶酸钙素(ROR = 42.83)。有趣的是,这些药物中有18种没有将鼻中隔穿孔列为已知的副作用。结论:本研究从药物警戒的角度全面概述了药物性鼻中隔穿孔,强调需要进一步研究以澄清这些关联并更新药物安全信息以降低患者风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
Safety and efficacy of currently used drug therapies for treatment of lymphomas in patients with Sjögren's disease, a scoping review. Insights gained from drug utilization research to improve safe clinical practice for children and adolescents in Denmark. Safe prescribing of antihypertensive drugs in the elderly and managing the risk of adverse events. Safety concerns associated with various types of statins: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database. Increased reporting of accidental overdose with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a population-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1