Cognition Assessment with ICOPE-Monitor: Identifying Candidates for Novel Therapies

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Medical Directors Association Pub Date : 2025-02-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105483
Emmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista PhD, MBBS , Maria Soto PhD, MD , Marie Fourteau MSc , Caroline Berbon MSc , Bruno Vellas PhD, MD , Julien Delrieu PhD, MD , Davide Angioni MD
{"title":"Cognition Assessment with ICOPE-Monitor: Identifying Candidates for Novel Therapies","authors":"Emmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista PhD, MBBS ,&nbsp;Maria Soto PhD, MD ,&nbsp;Marie Fourteau MSc ,&nbsp;Caroline Berbon MSc ,&nbsp;Bruno Vellas PhD, MD ,&nbsp;Julien Delrieu PhD, MD ,&nbsp;Davide Angioni MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe the clinical performance of the cognition battery on Step 1 (CogStep1) as a screening tool to detect (1) individuals with objective cognitive impairment regardless of their Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score, and specifically (2) to identify patients who could potentially benefit from anti-amyloid treatments. It was hypothesized that CogStep1 was sensitive enough to identify individuals with mild stages of cognitive deterioration compared with a comprehensive neuropsychological and clinical evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting and Participants</h3><div>Patients aged 60 and older referred to the Toulouse Memory Clinic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological and clinical evaluation and were also screened with the integrated care in older people (ICOPE)-monitor Step 1 by trained health professionals a maximum of 6 months before their memory consultation. Objective cognitive impairment was defined as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia, according to National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association criteria. A positive CogStep1 screening was considered if people had at least 1 mistake in the 3-word recall or the time orientation (weekday, month, year). Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were estimated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 352 participants [54.8% women, mean age 76.5 (SD 6.7)], 78.1% had a positive screening for CogStep1, and 75.6% had objective cognitive impairment. The clinimetric properties of CogStep1 to detect objective cognitive impairment (vs those without) were sensitivity = 87.0 (95% CI, 82.3–90.8), specificity = 48.8 (95% CI, 37.9–59.9), AUROC = 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62–0.74), PPV = 83.8 (95% CI, 78.8–87.9), and NPV = 55.3 (95% CI, 43.4–66.7). We found similar values among individuals with MCI or mild dementia who could be potential users of new anti-amyloid drugs (MMSE score ≥ 20 or 22).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and Implications</h3><div>CogStep1 demonstrated good sensitivity and PPV to identify objective cognitive impairment among older people referred to a memory clinic. Achieving excellent sensitivity and specificity values is challenging for a very short test. However, CogStep1 proved useful for risk-stratifying patients who can benefit from further cognitive assessment, biomarker measurements, and therapeutic management, especially in the context of new anti-amyloid therapies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":"26 4","pages":"Article 105483"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152586102400906X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To describe the clinical performance of the cognition battery on Step 1 (CogStep1) as a screening tool to detect (1) individuals with objective cognitive impairment regardless of their Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score, and specifically (2) to identify patients who could potentially benefit from anti-amyloid treatments. It was hypothesized that CogStep1 was sensitive enough to identify individuals with mild stages of cognitive deterioration compared with a comprehensive neuropsychological and clinical evaluation.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting and Participants

Patients aged 60 and older referred to the Toulouse Memory Clinic.

Methods

Participants underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological and clinical evaluation and were also screened with the integrated care in older people (ICOPE)-monitor Step 1 by trained health professionals a maximum of 6 months before their memory consultation. Objective cognitive impairment was defined as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia, according to National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association criteria. A positive CogStep1 screening was considered if people had at least 1 mistake in the 3-word recall or the time orientation (weekday, month, year). Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were estimated.

Results

Among the 352 participants [54.8% women, mean age 76.5 (SD 6.7)], 78.1% had a positive screening for CogStep1, and 75.6% had objective cognitive impairment. The clinimetric properties of CogStep1 to detect objective cognitive impairment (vs those without) were sensitivity = 87.0 (95% CI, 82.3–90.8), specificity = 48.8 (95% CI, 37.9–59.9), AUROC = 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62–0.74), PPV = 83.8 (95% CI, 78.8–87.9), and NPV = 55.3 (95% CI, 43.4–66.7). We found similar values among individuals with MCI or mild dementia who could be potential users of new anti-amyloid drugs (MMSE score ≥ 20 or 22).

Conclusion and Implications

CogStep1 demonstrated good sensitivity and PPV to identify objective cognitive impairment among older people referred to a memory clinic. Achieving excellent sensitivity and specificity values is challenging for a very short test. However, CogStep1 proved useful for risk-stratifying patients who can benefit from further cognitive assessment, biomarker measurements, and therapeutic management, especially in the context of new anti-amyloid therapies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用ICOPE-Monitor进行认知评估:确定新疗法的候选药物。
目的:描述认知电池在步骤1 (CogStep1)中的临床表现,作为一种筛查工具来检测(1)客观认知障碍的个体,而不管他们的迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)评分如何,特别是(2)识别可能从抗淀粉样蛋白治疗中获益的患者。假设与综合神经心理学和临床评估相比,CogStep1足够敏感,可以识别轻度认知衰退的个体。设计:横断面研究。环境和参与者:60岁及以上的患者被转介到图卢兹记忆诊所。方法:参与者接受了全面的神经心理学和临床评估,并在记忆咨询前最多6个月由训练有素的卫生专业人员进行了老年人综合护理(ICOPE)-监测步骤1的筛选。根据美国国家老龄化研究所和阿尔茨海默病协会的标准,客观认知障碍被定义为轻度认知障碍(MCI)或痴呆。如果人们在3个单词的回忆或时间取向(工作日、月份、年)中至少有一个错误,则认为CogStep1筛选为阳性。评估敏感性、特异性、受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。结果:352名受试者中(54.8%为女性,平均年龄76.5岁[SD 6.7]), 78.1%的受试者CogStep1筛查呈阳性,75.6%的受试者存在客观认知障碍。CogStep1检测客观认知障碍(相对于无认知障碍)的临床特性为敏感性= 87.0 (95% CI, 82.3-90.8),特异性= 48.8 (95% CI, 37.9-59.9), AUROC = 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62-0.74), PPV = 83.8 (95% CI, 78.8-87.9), NPV = 55.3 (95% CI, 43.4-66.7)。我们在MCI或轻度痴呆患者(MMSE评分≥20或22)中发现了类似的值,这些患者可能是新的抗淀粉样蛋白药物的潜在使用者。结论和意义:CogStep1在识别到记忆诊所就诊的老年人的客观认知障碍方面表现出良好的敏感性和PPV。对于一个非常短的测试来说,获得优异的灵敏度和特异性值是具有挑战性的。然而,CogStep1被证明对风险分层患者是有用的,这些患者可以从进一步的认知评估、生物标志物测量和治疗管理中获益,特别是在新的抗淀粉样蛋白疗法的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
期刊最新文献
Statewide Examination of Rural-Urban Differences in Assisted Living Facilities. Healing at Home: Receipt of Home Health Care and Patient-Centered Outcomes Among Older Adults After Acute Myocardial Infarction. Psychotherapy and Problematic Behavior Reduction in Long-Stay Nursing Home Residents With Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias. Real-World Evaluation of a Remote Patient Monitoring Service for Early Detection of Clinical Deterioration in Skilled Nursing Facilities. Risk of All-Cause Mortality in Different Muscle Health States Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1