Alternative approaches for bovine mastitis treatment: A critical review of emerging strategies, their effectiveness and limitations

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Research in veterinary science Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105557
Ella Debruyn , Nauman Zaheer Ghumman , Jiaxin Peng , Harish Kumar Tiwari , Jully Gogoi-Tiwari
{"title":"Alternative approaches for bovine mastitis treatment: A critical review of emerging strategies, their effectiveness and limitations","authors":"Ella Debruyn ,&nbsp;Nauman Zaheer Ghumman ,&nbsp;Jiaxin Peng ,&nbsp;Harish Kumar Tiwari ,&nbsp;Jully Gogoi-Tiwari","doi":"10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This review examined alternative treatments for bovine mastitis, driven by the rising issue of antibiotic resistance that limits the effectiveness of antibiotic therapies. As few new antibiotics are being developed, exploring non-antibiotic options is essential.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Data were gathered by searching five databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, NCBI, and CABI, for articles on alternative treatments for bovine mastitis. Full texts of relevant studies published from 2013 onwards, both <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in vivo</em>, were screened and retrieved. A deductive approach was used to identify key themes from the review. Data were presented using tables and graphs created with R software for visualisation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eligible studies included 69 articles tapered from an initial search of 1696 after removing duplicates and irrelevant records. Phytotherapy was found to be the most extensively researched approach, demonstrating significant effectiveness against mastitis pathogens, including multidrug-resistant <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>, coagulase-negative <em>S. aureus</em> (CoNS), <em>Escherichia coli</em>, different species of <em>Streptococci</em>, though concerns about the degradation of active compounds in milk and variability in natural product composition exist. Bacteriophage therapy also showed promise, with studies indicating its effectiveness and low risk of inducing bacterial resistance. Treatments such as Trisodium citrate, pheromonicin-NM, and lactoferrin therapy exhibited statistically significant results, particularly against biofilm formation, a major challenge in mastitis management. Many of these treatments lacked extensive <em>in vivo</em> validation. The review highlights the geographic concentration of research, predominantly in countries like China and India, and emphasises the need for more standardised protocols to improve comparison across studies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The review highlighted phytotherapy, followed by bacteriophage therapy, as the next most researched alternative treatment for mastitis, effective against various pathogens despite concerns about compound degradation. Future research should prioritise the long-term effects of these therapies and their real-world effectiveness in enhancing dairy cow welfare and improving productivity in dairy operations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21083,"journal":{"name":"Research in veterinary science","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 105557"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in veterinary science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825000311","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This review examined alternative treatments for bovine mastitis, driven by the rising issue of antibiotic resistance that limits the effectiveness of antibiotic therapies. As few new antibiotics are being developed, exploring non-antibiotic options is essential.

Method

Data were gathered by searching five databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, NCBI, and CABI, for articles on alternative treatments for bovine mastitis. Full texts of relevant studies published from 2013 onwards, both in vitro and in vivo, were screened and retrieved. A deductive approach was used to identify key themes from the review. Data were presented using tables and graphs created with R software for visualisation.

Results

Eligible studies included 69 articles tapered from an initial search of 1696 after removing duplicates and irrelevant records. Phytotherapy was found to be the most extensively researched approach, demonstrating significant effectiveness against mastitis pathogens, including multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative S. aureus (CoNS), Escherichia coli, different species of Streptococci, though concerns about the degradation of active compounds in milk and variability in natural product composition exist. Bacteriophage therapy also showed promise, with studies indicating its effectiveness and low risk of inducing bacterial resistance. Treatments such as Trisodium citrate, pheromonicin-NM, and lactoferrin therapy exhibited statistically significant results, particularly against biofilm formation, a major challenge in mastitis management. Many of these treatments lacked extensive in vivo validation. The review highlights the geographic concentration of research, predominantly in countries like China and India, and emphasises the need for more standardised protocols to improve comparison across studies.

Conclusion

The review highlighted phytotherapy, followed by bacteriophage therapy, as the next most researched alternative treatment for mastitis, effective against various pathogens despite concerns about compound degradation. Future research should prioritise the long-term effects of these therapies and their real-world effectiveness in enhancing dairy cow welfare and improving productivity in dairy operations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牛乳腺炎治疗的替代方法:新兴战略,其有效性和局限性的关键审查。
背景:这篇综述研究了奶牛乳腺炎的替代治疗方法,这是由于抗生素耐药性问题的增加,限制了抗生素治疗的有效性。由于正在开发的新抗生素很少,探索非抗生素的选择是必不可少的。方法:通过检索PubMed、Scopus、谷歌Scholar、NCBI、CABI等5个数据库,收集牛乳腺炎替代治疗方法的相关文献。筛选并检索2013年以来发表的相关体外和体内研究的全文。采用演绎法从审查中确定关键主题。数据是用R软件创建的表格和图形来显示的。结果:符合条件的研究包括69篇文章,在删除重复和不相关记录后,从最初的1696篇文章中逐渐减少。植物疗法被发现是研究最广泛的方法,显示出对乳腺炎病原体的显著有效性,包括耐多药金黄色葡萄球菌、凝固酶阴性金黄色葡萄球菌(con)、大肠杆菌和不同种类的链球菌,尽管存在对牛奶中活性化合物降解和天然产物成分变化的担忧。噬菌体疗法也显示出希望,研究表明其有效性和诱导细菌耐药性的低风险。柠檬酸三钠、信息素- nm和乳铁蛋白治疗显示出统计学上显著的结果,特别是对生物膜形成,这是乳腺炎治疗的主要挑战。许多这些治疗缺乏广泛的体内验证。该综述强调了研究的地理集中,主要集中在中国和印度等国家,并强调需要更标准化的方案来改善研究之间的比较。结论:该综述强调植物疗法,其次是噬菌体疗法,是研究最多的乳腺炎替代疗法,对各种病原体有效,尽管担心化合物降解。未来的研究应该优先考虑这些疗法的长期效果,以及它们在提高奶牛福利和提高奶牛生产效率方面的实际效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in veterinary science
Research in veterinary science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
312
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: Research in Veterinary Science is an International multi-disciplinary journal publishing original articles, reviews and short communications of a high scientific and ethical standard in all aspects of veterinary and biomedical research. The primary aim of the journal is to inform veterinary and biomedical scientists of significant advances in veterinary and related research through prompt publication and dissemination. Secondly, the journal aims to provide a general multi-disciplinary forum for discussion and debate of news and issues concerning veterinary science. Thirdly, to promote the dissemination of knowledge to a broader range of professions, globally. High quality papers on all species of animals are considered, particularly those considered to be of high scientific importance and originality, and with interdisciplinary interest. The journal encourages papers providing results that have clear implications for understanding disease pathogenesis and for the development of control measures or treatments, as well as those dealing with a comparative biomedical approach, which represents a substantial improvement to animal and human health. Studies without a robust scientific hypothesis or that are preliminary, or of weak originality, as well as negative results, are not appropriate for the journal. Furthermore, observational approaches, case studies or field reports lacking an advancement in general knowledge do not fall within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Genetic characterization of four bacteriophages of Salmonella enterica derived from different geographic regions in China via genomic comparison" [Research in Veterinary Science 189 (2025) 105608. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105608]. A field-ready colourimetric LAMP assay for detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum using rapid DNA extraction. The impact of injection site on the pharmacokinetics of danofloxacin in Pekin ducks (Anas platyrhynchos domestica). Tetracycline-resistant and -susceptible Chlamydia suis remain viable during manure processing. Prevalence and distribution of anisakid species in fish from North African marine waters: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1