What helps and what hurts adolescents’ sleep? An intense longitudinal ecological momentary assessment of daily facilitators and barriers of sleep on school and non-school nights

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Sleep medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.sleep.2024.12.035
Svetlana Maskevich, Lin Shen, Joshua F. Wiley, Sean P.A. Drummond, Bei Bei
{"title":"What helps and what hurts adolescents’ sleep? An intense longitudinal ecological momentary assessment of daily facilitators and barriers of sleep on school and non-school nights","authors":"Svetlana Maskevich,&nbsp;Lin Shen,&nbsp;Joshua F. Wiley,&nbsp;Sean P.A. Drummond,&nbsp;Bei Bei","doi":"10.1016/j.sleep.2024.12.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Using an intense longitudinal design, we investigated adolescents’ perceptions of everyday factors facilitating (i.e., facilitators) and hindering (i.e., barriers) sufficient and good quality sleep.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Adolescents (<em>N</em> = 205, <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 16.9 ± 0.9, 54.1 % female, 64.4 % non-white) completed daily morning surveys, assessing self-reported sleep and the use of 8 facilitators and 6 barriers of sleep from the previous night, and wore actigraphs over 2 school-weeks followed by 2 vacation-weeks (5162 total observations). Linear mixed-effects models examined the contribution of facilitators/barriers to actigraphy and self-reported total sleep time (TST) and sleep onset latency (SOL), controlling for age, sex, race, and study day. School/non-school day status was included as a moderator.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven facilitators and two barriers were reported by &gt;30 % of adolescents as frequently (≥50 % nights) helping/preventing them from achieving good sleep. Facilitators or barriers explained 1–5% (<em>p</em>-values &lt;.001) of unique variance above and beyond the covariates. Facilitators that predicted better sleep were: <em>following body cues</em>, <em>managing thoughts and emotions</em>, <em>creating good sleep environment</em>, <em>avoiding activities interfering with sleep</em>, and <em>bedtime planning</em> (only TST on school nights). Barriers that predicted worse sleep were: <em>pre-bed thoughts and emotions</em>, <em>unconducive sleep environment</em>, <em>activities interfering with sleep</em>, <em>inconsistent routines</em>, and <em>other household members’ activities</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Adolescents use a range of sleep-facilitating behaviours, and a number of factors prevent sufficient and good quality sleep in their everyday life. These factors are predictive of their sleep duration and onset latency and require further research to understand their functions and clinical implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21874,"journal":{"name":"Sleep medicine","volume":"127 ","pages":"Pages 178-185"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945724005999","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Using an intense longitudinal design, we investigated adolescents’ perceptions of everyday factors facilitating (i.e., facilitators) and hindering (i.e., barriers) sufficient and good quality sleep.

Method

Adolescents (N = 205, Mage = 16.9 ± 0.9, 54.1 % female, 64.4 % non-white) completed daily morning surveys, assessing self-reported sleep and the use of 8 facilitators and 6 barriers of sleep from the previous night, and wore actigraphs over 2 school-weeks followed by 2 vacation-weeks (5162 total observations). Linear mixed-effects models examined the contribution of facilitators/barriers to actigraphy and self-reported total sleep time (TST) and sleep onset latency (SOL), controlling for age, sex, race, and study day. School/non-school day status was included as a moderator.

Results

Seven facilitators and two barriers were reported by >30 % of adolescents as frequently (≥50 % nights) helping/preventing them from achieving good sleep. Facilitators or barriers explained 1–5% (p-values <.001) of unique variance above and beyond the covariates. Facilitators that predicted better sleep were: following body cues, managing thoughts and emotions, creating good sleep environment, avoiding activities interfering with sleep, and bedtime planning (only TST on school nights). Barriers that predicted worse sleep were: pre-bed thoughts and emotions, unconducive sleep environment, activities interfering with sleep, inconsistent routines, and other household members’ activities.

Conclusion

Adolescents use a range of sleep-facilitating behaviours, and a number of factors prevent sufficient and good quality sleep in their everyday life. These factors are predictive of their sleep duration and onset latency and require further research to understand their functions and clinical implications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什么对青少年的睡眠有益,什么对青少年的睡眠有害?在学校和非学校的夜晚,对日常睡眠的促进因素和障碍进行了强烈的纵向生态瞬间评估。
目的:采用高强度的纵向设计,我们调查了青少年对促进(即促进者)和阻碍(即障碍)充足和优质睡眠的日常因素的看法。方法:青少年(N = 205,年龄= 16.9±0.9,女性54.1%,非白人64.4%)完成每日晨间问卷调查,评估自评睡眠情况及前一晚起使用8种睡眠促进器和6种睡眠障碍的情况,并在2个学校周和2个假期周期间佩戴活动记录仪(共5162人)。线性混合效应模型检验了促进因素/障碍因素对活动记录和自我报告的总睡眠时间(TST)和睡眠发作潜伏期(SOL)的贡献,控制了年龄、性别、种族和学习日期。学校/非学校日的状态被包括为一个主持人。结果:约30%的青少年报告了7个促进因素和2个障碍因素经常(≥50%的夜晚)帮助/阻止他们获得良好的睡眠。促进因素或障碍解释1-5% (p值)结论:青少年使用一系列促进睡眠的行为,许多因素在他们的日常生活中阻碍了充足和高质量的睡眠。这些因素可预测其睡眠持续时间和发病潜伏期,需要进一步研究以了解其功能和临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep medicine
Sleep medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1060
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Sleep Medicine aims to be a journal no one involved in clinical sleep medicine can do without. A journal primarily focussing on the human aspects of sleep, integrating the various disciplines that are involved in sleep medicine: neurology, clinical neurophysiology, internal medicine (particularly pulmonology and cardiology), psychology, psychiatry, sleep technology, pediatrics, neurosurgery, otorhinolaryngology, and dentistry. The journal publishes the following types of articles: Reviews (also intended as a way to bridge the gap between basic sleep research and clinical relevance); Original Research Articles; Full-length articles; Brief communications; Controversies; Case reports; Letters to the Editor; Journal search and commentaries; Book reviews; Meeting announcements; Listing of relevant organisations plus web sites.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of school start times and adolescent sleep by WHO region Who misuses sedatives for sleep? Evidence from a nationally representative US sample Digital insomnia therapeutic as a workplace performance solution for improving productivity Sleep and its associations with other health behaviours and sociodemographic factors in Australian children under 5 years old Factors associated with inadequate sleep among high school students in New Mexico: Data from the New Mexico Youth Risk and Resiliency Survey 2015-2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1