Affordances of fractions and decimals for arithmetic among middle school students in the United States and China

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106187
Qiushan Liu , Yunqi Wang , David W. Braithwaite
{"title":"Affordances of fractions and decimals for arithmetic among middle school students in the United States and China","authors":"Qiushan Liu ,&nbsp;Yunqi Wang ,&nbsp;David W. Braithwaite","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent research by <span><span>Liu and Braithwaite (2023</span></span>; Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 49, pp. 1459–1470) revealed differential affordances of fractions and decimals for arithmetic. Specifically, adults preferred to solve addition problems in decimal form rather than fraction form and preferred to solve multiplication problems in fraction form rather than decimal form. The current study tested whether similar preferences would appear among middle school children in the United States (N = 84) and China (N = 88) and whether analogous patterns would appear in children’s calculation performance. Like adults in Liu and Braithwaite’s study, children in both countries preferred decimals more for addition and preferred fractions more for multiplication. Furthermore, calculation accuracy was relatively higher with decimals for addition and with fractions for multiplication, and calculation was perceived to be relatively less effortful with decimals for addition and with fractions for multiplication. We consider both conceptual and procedural explanations for the findings, based respectively on semantic alignment theory and strategy choice theory, and conclude that a procedural perspective offers the more complete and parsimonious explanation. Educational implications of the findings are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 106187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524003278","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent research by Liu and Braithwaite (2023; Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 49, pp. 1459–1470) revealed differential affordances of fractions and decimals for arithmetic. Specifically, adults preferred to solve addition problems in decimal form rather than fraction form and preferred to solve multiplication problems in fraction form rather than decimal form. The current study tested whether similar preferences would appear among middle school children in the United States (N = 84) and China (N = 88) and whether analogous patterns would appear in children’s calculation performance. Like adults in Liu and Braithwaite’s study, children in both countries preferred decimals more for addition and preferred fractions more for multiplication. Furthermore, calculation accuracy was relatively higher with decimals for addition and with fractions for multiplication, and calculation was perceived to be relatively less effortful with decimals for addition and with fractions for multiplication. We consider both conceptual and procedural explanations for the findings, based respectively on semantic alignment theory and strategy choice theory, and conclude that a procedural perspective offers the more complete and parsimonious explanation. Educational implications of the findings are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
期刊最新文献
Effects of morphological awareness, naming speed, and phonological awareness on reading skills from Grade 3 to Grade 5 The impact of handwriting and typing practice in children’s letter and word learning: Implications for literacy development Editorial Board Economic risk proneness in middle childhood: Uncertainty-driven exploration or novelty-seeking? Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1