“If there was a quick and easy way to participate”: The engagement of United Kingdom radiotherapy and diagnostic imaging departments in research strategy

Abstract

Introduction

Research strategies support professionals to create a shared vision and work towards common objectives which can enhance workforce satisfaction, retention and patient experience. Our research aimed to capture the current number of United Kingdom (UK) radiotherapy and diagnostic imaging departments that have a local discipline specific research strategy in place. We also sought to understand the contributing factors to their development, with the aim of generating models of support to enhance future local research strategies.

Methods

A discipline specific cross-sectional survey was co-developed by the research team, the College of Radiographers (CoR) and our patient and public involvement and engagement representative. Distribution was via the CoR to radiotherapy and imaging departments across the UK.

Results

Complete responses were received from 32 radiotherapy and 19 imaging departments, discipline specific strategy numbers were low with only 10 and 3 departments respectively having one in situ. Barriers and enablers to their development as well as disparate motivations and intentions to develop a strategy were evident within and across each discipline. The respondents identified a range of formats and topics to help the development of strategies.

Conclusion

Radiographers are keen to develop and implement their own research ideas, however this work is additional to clinical service demand. Removing barriers to research participation is a strategic priority, regional cooperation and coordination may play an increasing role in research engagement, scale and support. Opportunities to increase ownership and confidence in research strategy development should be pursued including template strategies and professional facilitation.

Implications for practice

A discipline specific strategy would support departments to navigate the complexities of research regulation and policy and overcome the challenges faced by competing priorities.