K. Matthews , C. Kamp , N. Dalen-Seime , B. Kraus , F. Zarb , P. Sakariassen , P.S. Costa , G. Aarhu , P. Bezzina , M. Jaronen , J. Huhtanen , R. Strudwick
{"title":"User evaluation of clinical simulation-based learning developed by FORCE (Framework for Online Radiographer Clinical Education)","authors":"K. Matthews , C. Kamp , N. Dalen-Seime , B. Kraus , F. Zarb , P. Sakariassen , P.S. Costa , G. Aarhu , P. Bezzina , M. Jaronen , J. Huhtanen , R. Strudwick","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The FORCE initiative, funded by the EU, was created in response to the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on radiography education. It offers a virtual learning environment (VLE) filled with clinical simulation scenarios targeting Diagnostic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, and Radiotherapy. These scenarios are designed to provide open-access, simulation-based learning (SBL) resources that help radiography undergraduates engage in problem-based learning across relevant clinical knowledge and professional awareness. This study presents the results of an online survey aimed at evaluating the FORCE VLE and SBL resources to guide future development.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The survey targeted academic and clinical staff in Radiography and student Radiographers. It was based on the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) and modified to include topics relevant to online learning, using a five-point Likert Scale (LS). The questionnaire consisted of four sections: research information and consent; socio-demographic data; LS-based questions on case structure, content, interactivity, technical aspects, multimedia quality, and overall experience; and open-text responses.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 407 invited participants, 109 (27 %) responded, with 77 % being students and 23 % clinical or academic radiographers from 13 countries. English proficiency was reported by 76 % of respondents. The median LS was consistently 4 across all categories, indicating high satisfaction. Content analysis of 159 open-text comments revealed 139 positive opinions on the SBL resources.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The FORCE VLE SBL resources were highly regarded for their interactivity, applicability, and support in consolidating knowledge and enhancing patient care. Suggestions for improvement were minor, mainly focusing on navigation and specific content preferences.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Expanding the availability of online SBL cases could enhance Radiographer education and promote inclusivity across the field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 2","pages":"Article 102870"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817425000057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The FORCE initiative, funded by the EU, was created in response to the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on radiography education. It offers a virtual learning environment (VLE) filled with clinical simulation scenarios targeting Diagnostic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, and Radiotherapy. These scenarios are designed to provide open-access, simulation-based learning (SBL) resources that help radiography undergraduates engage in problem-based learning across relevant clinical knowledge and professional awareness. This study presents the results of an online survey aimed at evaluating the FORCE VLE and SBL resources to guide future development.
Methods
The survey targeted academic and clinical staff in Radiography and student Radiographers. It was based on the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) and modified to include topics relevant to online learning, using a five-point Likert Scale (LS). The questionnaire consisted of four sections: research information and consent; socio-demographic data; LS-based questions on case structure, content, interactivity, technical aspects, multimedia quality, and overall experience; and open-text responses.
Results
Of the 407 invited participants, 109 (27 %) responded, with 77 % being students and 23 % clinical or academic radiographers from 13 countries. English proficiency was reported by 76 % of respondents. The median LS was consistently 4 across all categories, indicating high satisfaction. Content analysis of 159 open-text comments revealed 139 positive opinions on the SBL resources.
Conclusion
The FORCE VLE SBL resources were highly regarded for their interactivity, applicability, and support in consolidating knowledge and enhancing patient care. Suggestions for improvement were minor, mainly focusing on navigation and specific content preferences.
Implications for practice
Expanding the availability of online SBL cases could enhance Radiographer education and promote inclusivity across the field.
RadiographyRADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍:
Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.