Modern Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis of Ocular Surface Disease in Type 1 Diabetes. A Pilot Study.

Q4 Medicine Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.31348/2025/3
Josef Štorm, Marie Česká Burdová, Jiří Uhlík, Marcela Minaříková, Tereza Vrabcová Lainová, Martin Hložánek, Gabriela Mahelková
{"title":"Modern Biomarkers for Early Diagnosis of Ocular Surface Disease in Type 1 Diabetes. A Pilot Study.","authors":"Josef Štorm, Marie Česká Burdová, Jiří Uhlík, Marcela Minaříková, Tereza Vrabcová Lainová, Martin Hložánek, Gabriela Mahelková","doi":"10.31348/2025/3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with dry eye syndrome form a significant proportion of those treated in everyday ophthalmology practice. Diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for the development of dry eye syndrome. Changes in tear film homeostasis, chronic inflammation and subsequent corneal nerve fiber pathology play a key role in its progression. The aim of this study was to describe the status of modern biomarkers of ocular surface damage in patients with type 1 diabetes and asses their utility in early diagnosis of dry eye syndrome.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong> In total the pilot study included 19 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and 15 patients in the control group. All patients underwent a detailed ocular surface examination, sample collection for matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) laboratory analysis and epithelial HLA-DR expression evaluation, and in-vivo corneal confocal microscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> T1D patients showed statistically significantly reduced corneal nerve fiber length (p = 0.0482). The differences between the groups in terms of osmolarity, corneal sensitivity, Oxford score, tear break-up time and MMP-9 level were not statistically significant (p = 0.8272, p = 0.6029, p = 0.3507, p = 0.7561 and p = 0.0826 respectively). HLA-DR expression was examined in 10 T1D patients and 8 patients in the control group. Both groups showed minimal or no expression (p &gt; 0.9999).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The previously published literature supports our finding of corneal nerve fiber length reduction in T1D patients compared to controls. However, we did not find any significant changes in standard or modern ocular surface markers (MMP-9 levels, HLA-DR expression) measured in patients with dry eye syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":39839,"journal":{"name":"Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie","volume":"81 Ahead of Print","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31348/2025/3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with dry eye syndrome form a significant proportion of those treated in everyday ophthalmology practice. Diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for the development of dry eye syndrome. Changes in tear film homeostasis, chronic inflammation and subsequent corneal nerve fiber pathology play a key role in its progression. The aim of this study was to describe the status of modern biomarkers of ocular surface damage in patients with type 1 diabetes and asses their utility in early diagnosis of dry eye syndrome.

Material and methods:  In total the pilot study included 19 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and 15 patients in the control group. All patients underwent a detailed ocular surface examination, sample collection for matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) laboratory analysis and epithelial HLA-DR expression evaluation, and in-vivo corneal confocal microscopy.

Results:  T1D patients showed statistically significantly reduced corneal nerve fiber length (p = 0.0482). The differences between the groups in terms of osmolarity, corneal sensitivity, Oxford score, tear break-up time and MMP-9 level were not statistically significant (p = 0.8272, p = 0.6029, p = 0.3507, p = 0.7561 and p = 0.0826 respectively). HLA-DR expression was examined in 10 T1D patients and 8 patients in the control group. Both groups showed minimal or no expression (p > 0.9999).

Conclusion:  The previously published literature supports our finding of corneal nerve fiber length reduction in T1D patients compared to controls. However, we did not find any significant changes in standard or modern ocular surface markers (MMP-9 levels, HLA-DR expression) measured in patients with dry eye syndrome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie
Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: - Redakce přijímá pouze práce vyhovující po odborné stránce, které jsou na odpovídající profesionální a formální úrovni. - Uveřejněná práce se stává majetkem časopisu, přetisknout její část nebo obrázek lze jen s citací původu. - Rukopis zasílejte v originále a dobře čitelné kopii (je nutná také kopie tabulek, legend, podle možnosti i obrázků). - Listy číslujte v pravém horním rohu a spojujte svorkou, nesešívejte. Přijímáme práce psané na jedné straně kvalitního bílého nelesklého papíru formátu A4 (neprůklepový) na psacím stroji nebo počítači s obvyklými typy.
期刊最新文献
Choroidal Thickness and Central Macular Thickness Measurements with Cirrus HD-OCT in Healthy Individuals in the Turkish Population Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema Focusing on the Role of OCT Biomarkers Long-Term Refractive and Topographical Changes in Keratoconic Eyes after Accelerated Corneal Crosslinking. Surgical Treatment of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment in the Only Seeing Eye. Easy Method of Pterygium Excision using Autologous Blood for Conjunctiva Autograft Fixation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1