Preoperative anemia is an unsuspecting driver of machine learning prediction of adverse outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.031
Attri Ghosh, Philip J Freda, Shane Shahrestani, Andre E Boyke, Alena Orlenko, Hyunjun Choi, Nicholas Matsumoto, Tayo Obafemi-Ajayi, Jason H Moore, Corey T Walker
{"title":"Preoperative anemia is an unsuspecting driver of machine learning prediction of adverse outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion.","authors":"Attri Ghosh, Philip J Freda, Shane Shahrestani, Andre E Boyke, Alena Orlenko, Hyunjun Choi, Nicholas Matsumoto, Tayo Obafemi-Ajayi, Jason H Moore, Corey T Walker","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Preoperative risk assessment remains a challenge in spinal fusion operations. Predictive modeling provides data-driven estimates of postsurgical outcomes, guiding clinical decisions and improving patient care. Moreover, automated machine learning models are both effective and user-friendly, allowing healthcare professionals with minimal technical expertise to identify high-risk patients who may need additional preoperative support.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the use of automated machine learning models to predict discharge disposition, length of hospital stay, and readmission postsurgery by analyzing preoperative patient electronic medical record data and identifying key factors influencing adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>The sample includes electronic medical records of 3,006 unique surgical events from 2,855 patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion surgeries at a single institution.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The adverse outcomes assessed were discharge disposition (nonhome facility), length of hospital stay (extended stay), and readmission within 90 days postsurgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed several inferential and predictive approaches, including the automated machine learning tool TPOT2 (Tree-based Pipeline Optimization Tool-2). TPOT2, which uses genetic programming to select optimal machine learning pipelines in a process inspired by molecular evolution, constructed, optimized and identified robust predictive models for all outcomes. Feature importance values were derived to identify major preoperative predictive features driving optimal models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adverse outcome rates were 25.9% for discharge to nonhome facilities, 23.9% for extended hospital stay, and 24.7% for readmission within 90 days postsurgery. TPOT2 delivered the best-performing predictive models, achieving balanced accuracies ([Sensitivity {true positive rate} + Specificity {true negative rate}]) / 2) of 0.72 for discharge disposition, 0.72 for length of stay, and 0.67 for readmission. Notably, preoperative hemoglobin emerged as a consistently strong predictor in best-performing models across outcomes. Patients with severe anemia (hemoglobin <80g/dL) demonstrated higher associations with all adverse outcomes and common comorbidities associated with frailty (e.g., hypertension, type II diabetes, and chronic pain). Additional patient variables and comorbidities, including body mass index, age, and mental health status, influencing postsurgical outcomes were also highly predictive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates the effectiveness of automated machine learning in predicting postsurgical adverse outcomes and identifying key preoperative predictors associated with such outcomes. While factors like age, BMI, insurance type, and specific comorbidities showed notable effects on outcomes, preoperative hemoglobin consistently emerged as a significant predictor across outcomes, suggesting its critical role in presurgical assessment. These findings underscore the potential of enhancing patient care and preoperative assessment through advanced predictive modeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Preoperative risk assessment remains a challenge in spinal fusion operations. Predictive modeling provides data-driven estimates of postsurgical outcomes, guiding clinical decisions and improving patient care. Moreover, automated machine learning models are both effective and user-friendly, allowing healthcare professionals with minimal technical expertise to identify high-risk patients who may need additional preoperative support.

Purpose: This study investigated the use of automated machine learning models to predict discharge disposition, length of hospital stay, and readmission postsurgery by analyzing preoperative patient electronic medical record data and identifying key factors influencing adverse outcomes.

Study design/setting: Retrospective cohort study.

Patient sample: The sample includes electronic medical records of 3,006 unique surgical events from 2,855 patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion surgeries at a single institution.

Outcome measures: The adverse outcomes assessed were discharge disposition (nonhome facility), length of hospital stay (extended stay), and readmission within 90 days postsurgery.

Methods: We employed several inferential and predictive approaches, including the automated machine learning tool TPOT2 (Tree-based Pipeline Optimization Tool-2). TPOT2, which uses genetic programming to select optimal machine learning pipelines in a process inspired by molecular evolution, constructed, optimized and identified robust predictive models for all outcomes. Feature importance values were derived to identify major preoperative predictive features driving optimal models.

Results: Adverse outcome rates were 25.9% for discharge to nonhome facilities, 23.9% for extended hospital stay, and 24.7% for readmission within 90 days postsurgery. TPOT2 delivered the best-performing predictive models, achieving balanced accuracies ([Sensitivity {true positive rate} + Specificity {true negative rate}]) / 2) of 0.72 for discharge disposition, 0.72 for length of stay, and 0.67 for readmission. Notably, preoperative hemoglobin emerged as a consistently strong predictor in best-performing models across outcomes. Patients with severe anemia (hemoglobin <80g/dL) demonstrated higher associations with all adverse outcomes and common comorbidities associated with frailty (e.g., hypertension, type II diabetes, and chronic pain). Additional patient variables and comorbidities, including body mass index, age, and mental health status, influencing postsurgical outcomes were also highly predictive.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of automated machine learning in predicting postsurgical adverse outcomes and identifying key preoperative predictors associated with such outcomes. While factors like age, BMI, insurance type, and specific comorbidities showed notable effects on outcomes, preoperative hemoglobin consistently emerged as a significant predictor across outcomes, suggesting its critical role in presurgical assessment. These findings underscore the potential of enhancing patient care and preoperative assessment through advanced predictive modeling.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前贫血是机器学习预测腰椎融合术后不良后果的一个未知驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
The cost-effectiveness of physical therapy versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: A Markov decision analysis. The New Era of Cost Analysis in Spine Surgery Utilizing Time-Driven Activity Based Costing: A Systematic Review and Introduction of an Enabling Technology Value Index. Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Are We Finally There? A Meta-Analysis of Its Effectiveness Against Conventional and Tubular Microdiscectomy. Failure forces of different interspinous vertebropexy techniques. The Dural Deviation Ratio: A Novel Indicator for Preoperative Differentiation of Intradural Extension in Spinal Dumbbell Tumors Schwannomas Using Axial T2-weighted MRI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1