Preoperative anemia is an unsuspecting driver of machine learning prediction of adverse outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.031
Attri Ghosh MSc , Philip J. Freda PhD , Shane Shahrestani MD, PhD , Andre E. Boyke MD , Alena Orlenko PhD , Hyunjun Choi MSc , Nicholas Matsumoto BA , Tayo Obafemi-Ajayi PhD , Jason H. Moore PhD , Corey T. Walker MD
{"title":"Preoperative anemia is an unsuspecting driver of machine learning prediction of adverse outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion","authors":"Attri Ghosh MSc ,&nbsp;Philip J. Freda PhD ,&nbsp;Shane Shahrestani MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Andre E. Boyke MD ,&nbsp;Alena Orlenko PhD ,&nbsp;Hyunjun Choi MSc ,&nbsp;Nicholas Matsumoto BA ,&nbsp;Tayo Obafemi-Ajayi PhD ,&nbsp;Jason H. Moore PhD ,&nbsp;Corey T. Walker MD","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3><div>Preoperative risk assessment remains a challenge in spinal fusion operations. Predictive modeling provides data-driven estimates of postsurgical outcomes, guiding clinical decisions and improving patient care. Moreover, automated machine learning models are both effective and user-friendly, allowing healthcare professionals with minimal technical expertise to identify high-risk patients who may need additional preoperative support.</div></div><div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><div>This study investigated the use of automated machine learning models to predict discharge disposition, length of hospital stay, and readmission postsurgery by analyzing preoperative patient electronic medical record data and identifying key factors influencing adverse outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3><div>The sample includes electronic medical records of 3,006 unique surgical events from 2,855 patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion surgeries at a single institution.</div></div><div><h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3><div>The adverse outcomes assessed were discharge disposition (nonhome facility), length of hospital stay (extended stay), and readmission within 90 days postsurgery.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We employed several inferential and predictive approaches, including the automated machine learning tool TPOT2 (Tree-based Pipeline Optimization Tool-2). TPOT2, which uses genetic programming to select optimal machine learning pipelines in a process inspired by molecular evolution, constructed, optimized and identified robust predictive models for all outcomes. Feature importance values were derived to identify major preoperative predictive features driving optimal models.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Adverse outcome rates were 25.9% for discharge to nonhome facilities, 23.9% for extended hospital stay, and 24.7% for readmission within 90 days postsurgery. TPOT2 delivered the best-performing predictive models, achieving balanced accuracies ([Sensitivity {true positive rate} + Specificity {true negative rate}]) / 2) of 0.72 for discharge disposition, 0.72 for length of stay, and 0.67 for readmission. Notably, preoperative hemoglobin emerged as a consistently strong predictor in best-performing models across outcomes. Patients with severe anemia (hemoglobin &lt;80g/dL) demonstrated higher associations with all adverse outcomes and common comorbidities associated with frailty (eg, hypertension, type II diabetes, and chronic pain). Additional patient variables and comorbidities, including body mass index, age, and mental health status, influencing postsurgical outcomes were also highly predictive.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>This study demonstrates the effectiveness of automated machine learning in predicting postsurgical adverse outcomes and identifying key preoperative predictors associated with such outcomes. While factors like age, BMI, insurance type, and specific comorbidities showed notable effects on outcomes, preoperative hemoglobin consistently emerged as a significant predictor across outcomes, suggesting its critical role in presurgical assessment. These findings underscore the potential of enhancing patient care and preoperative assessment through advanced predictive modeling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":"25 8","pages":"Pages 1596-1607"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152994302500052X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Preoperative risk assessment remains a challenge in spinal fusion operations. Predictive modeling provides data-driven estimates of postsurgical outcomes, guiding clinical decisions and improving patient care. Moreover, automated machine learning models are both effective and user-friendly, allowing healthcare professionals with minimal technical expertise to identify high-risk patients who may need additional preoperative support.

PURPOSE

This study investigated the use of automated machine learning models to predict discharge disposition, length of hospital stay, and readmission postsurgery by analyzing preoperative patient electronic medical record data and identifying key factors influencing adverse outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The sample includes electronic medical records of 3,006 unique surgical events from 2,855 patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion surgeries at a single institution.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The adverse outcomes assessed were discharge disposition (nonhome facility), length of hospital stay (extended stay), and readmission within 90 days postsurgery.

METHODS

We employed several inferential and predictive approaches, including the automated machine learning tool TPOT2 (Tree-based Pipeline Optimization Tool-2). TPOT2, which uses genetic programming to select optimal machine learning pipelines in a process inspired by molecular evolution, constructed, optimized and identified robust predictive models for all outcomes. Feature importance values were derived to identify major preoperative predictive features driving optimal models.

RESULTS

Adverse outcome rates were 25.9% for discharge to nonhome facilities, 23.9% for extended hospital stay, and 24.7% for readmission within 90 days postsurgery. TPOT2 delivered the best-performing predictive models, achieving balanced accuracies ([Sensitivity {true positive rate} + Specificity {true negative rate}]) / 2) of 0.72 for discharge disposition, 0.72 for length of stay, and 0.67 for readmission. Notably, preoperative hemoglobin emerged as a consistently strong predictor in best-performing models across outcomes. Patients with severe anemia (hemoglobin <80g/dL) demonstrated higher associations with all adverse outcomes and common comorbidities associated with frailty (eg, hypertension, type II diabetes, and chronic pain). Additional patient variables and comorbidities, including body mass index, age, and mental health status, influencing postsurgical outcomes were also highly predictive.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the effectiveness of automated machine learning in predicting postsurgical adverse outcomes and identifying key preoperative predictors associated with such outcomes. While factors like age, BMI, insurance type, and specific comorbidities showed notable effects on outcomes, preoperative hemoglobin consistently emerged as a significant predictor across outcomes, suggesting its critical role in presurgical assessment. These findings underscore the potential of enhancing patient care and preoperative assessment through advanced predictive modeling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前贫血是机器学习预测腰椎融合术后不良后果的一个未知驱动因素。
背景:脊柱融合手术的术前风险评估仍然是一个挑战。预测建模提供了术后结果的数据驱动估计,指导临床决策和改善患者护理。此外,自动化机器学习模型既有效又用户友好,使医疗保健专业人员能够以最少的技术专长识别可能需要额外术前支持的高危患者。目的:本研究通过分析术前患者电子病历数据并确定影响不良结局的关键因素,探讨了使用自动机器学习模型预测出院处置、住院时间和术后再入院。研究设计/设置:回顾性队列研究。患者样本:样本包括在同一机构接受腰椎融合手术的2,855例患者的3,006例独特手术事件的电子医疗记录。结果测量:评估的不良结果包括出院处理(非家庭设施)、住院时间(延长住院时间)和术后90天内再入院。方法:我们采用了几种推断和预测方法,包括自动化机器学习工具TPOT2(基于树的管道优化工具-2)。TPOT2使用遗传编程在受分子进化启发的过程中选择最佳机器学习管道,为所有结果构建、优化并确定了稳健的预测模型。提取特征重要性值以确定驱动最优模型的主要术前预测特征。结果:术后90天内再入院的不良预后率为24.7%,非家庭机构出院的不良预后率为25.9%,延长住院的不良预后率为23.9%。TPOT2提供了最好的预测模型,达到了平衡的准确性(敏感性[真阳性率] + 特异性[真阴性率])/ 2),出院处置为0.72,住院时间为0.72,再入院为0.67。值得注意的是,术前血红蛋白在所有结果的最佳模型中始终是一个强有力的预测因子。结论:本研究证明了自动机器学习在预测术后不良结果和识别与这些结果相关的关键术前预测因素方面的有效性。虽然年龄、BMI、保险类型和特定合并症等因素对预后有显著影响,但术前血红蛋白一直是预后的重要预测因素,表明其在术前评估中的关键作用。这些发现强调了通过先进的预测建模来加强患者护理和术前评估的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Chronic low back pain is associated with remotely collected gait quality and quantity parameters from a wrist-worn accelerometer. Cost Comparisons and Perioperative Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Tandem Spinal Stenosis. Spontaneous atlantoaxial facet joint autofusion after posterior C1-2 fusion. Specific Patient-Reported Impairments in Normal Endeavors (SPINE): Creating and Preliminarily Validating a Novel Lumbar Radiculopathy Survey. Trends in Laminoplasty Versus Posterior Cervical Fusion in the United States: A Retrospective Analysis from 2015 to 2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1