Importance of circulating tumor DNA analysis at diagnosis in early triple-negative breast cancer patients.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1007/s12282-025-01673-y
Min-Seung Park, Eun Hye Cho, Youngjin Youn, In-Gu Do, Hee-Yeon Woo, Hyosoon Park, Eun Young Kim, Min-Jung Kwon
{"title":"Importance of circulating tumor DNA analysis at diagnosis in early triple-negative breast cancer patients.","authors":"Min-Seung Park, Eun Hye Cho, Youngjin Youn, In-Gu Do, Hee-Yeon Woo, Hyosoon Park, Eun Young Kim, Min-Jung Kwon","doi":"10.1007/s12282-025-01673-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) enables non-invasive evaluation and is considered a promising tool for diagnosis, treatment selection, risk stratification, and disease monitoring. However, while the utility of ctDNA has been demonstrated in advanced-stage cancers, its detection in early breast cancer (EBC) remains limited. This study investigated the characteristics of EBC patients associated with higher ctDNA detectability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 101 patients with EBC were enrolled. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples (FFPEs) were obtained from biopsy tissue, and plasma samples were collected before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Forty-seven breast cancer-related genes were analyzed using next-generation sequencing. The diagnostic performance of ctDNA was evaluated, and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the impact of clinical and molecular factors on ctDNA status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequently identified gene was TP53 (FFPE, 66.7%; ctDNA, 46.4%), followed by PIK3CA (FFPE, 36.2%; ctDNA, 17.4%). The diagnostic performance of the three most common genes showed a sensitivity range of 11.1-58.7%, specificity of 78.3-100%, and diagnostic accuracy of 65.2-78.3%. The triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype exhibited the strongest association with ctDNA detection (odds ratio [OR] 209.50, p = 0.005) in multivariate analysis. Also, those who exhibited ctDNA clearance after NAC had a higher pathological complete response rate compared to those without clearance (38.5% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.238).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlights that ctDNA analysis can complement genetic testing from a single tissue biopsy in breast cancer patients. Furthermore, ctDNA analysis may be particularly important in patients with TNBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"416-425"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-025-01673-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) enables non-invasive evaluation and is considered a promising tool for diagnosis, treatment selection, risk stratification, and disease monitoring. However, while the utility of ctDNA has been demonstrated in advanced-stage cancers, its detection in early breast cancer (EBC) remains limited. This study investigated the characteristics of EBC patients associated with higher ctDNA detectability.

Methods: A total of 101 patients with EBC were enrolled. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples (FFPEs) were obtained from biopsy tissue, and plasma samples were collected before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Forty-seven breast cancer-related genes were analyzed using next-generation sequencing. The diagnostic performance of ctDNA was evaluated, and logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the impact of clinical and molecular factors on ctDNA status.

Results: The most frequently identified gene was TP53 (FFPE, 66.7%; ctDNA, 46.4%), followed by PIK3CA (FFPE, 36.2%; ctDNA, 17.4%). The diagnostic performance of the three most common genes showed a sensitivity range of 11.1-58.7%, specificity of 78.3-100%, and diagnostic accuracy of 65.2-78.3%. The triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype exhibited the strongest association with ctDNA detection (odds ratio [OR] 209.50, p = 0.005) in multivariate analysis. Also, those who exhibited ctDNA clearance after NAC had a higher pathological complete response rate compared to those without clearance (38.5% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.238).

Conclusions: Our study highlights that ctDNA analysis can complement genetic testing from a single tissue biopsy in breast cancer patients. Furthermore, ctDNA analysis may be particularly important in patients with TNBC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循环肿瘤DNA分析在早期三阴性乳腺癌患者诊断中的重要性。
背景:循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)能够进行无创评估,被认为是诊断、治疗选择、风险分层和疾病监测的有前途的工具。然而,尽管ctDNA在晚期癌症中的应用已经得到证实,但它在早期乳腺癌(EBC)中的检测仍然有限。本研究探讨了与ctDNA高检出率相关的EBC患者的特征。方法:共纳入101例EBC患者。活检组织取福尔马林固定石蜡包埋标本(FFPEs),新辅助化疗(NAC)前后取血浆标本。使用下一代测序技术分析了47个乳腺癌相关基因。评估ctDNA的诊断效能,并进行logistic回归分析,评估临床和分子因素对ctDNA状态的影响。结果:TP53是最常见的基因(FFPE, 66.7%);ctDNA, 46.4%),其次是PIK3CA (FFPE, 36.2%;ctDNA, 17.4%)。3个最常见基因的诊断表现为敏感性为11.1-58.7%,特异性为78.3-100%,诊断准确率为65.2-78.3%。在多因素分析中,三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)亚型与ctDNA检测的相关性最强(优势比[OR] 209.50, p = 0.005)。此外,NAC后ctDNA清除的患者病理完全缓解率高于未清除的患者(38.5% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.238)。结论:我们的研究强调ctDNA分析可以补充乳腺癌患者单一组织活检的基因检测。此外,ctDNA分析在TNBC患者中可能特别重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.50%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer, the official journal of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, publishes articles that contribute to progress in the field, in basic or translational research and also in clinical research, seeking to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all who are concerned with breast cancer. The journal welcomes all original articles describing clinical and epidemiological studies and laboratory investigations regarding breast cancer and related diseases. The journal will consider five types of articles: editorials, review articles, original articles, case reports, and rapid communications. Although editorials and review articles will principally be solicited by the editors, they can also be submitted for peer review, as in the case of original articles. The journal provides the best of up-to-date information on breast cancer, presenting readers with high-impact, original work focusing on pivotal issues.
期刊最新文献
Deep learning model with collage images for the segmentation of dedicated breast positron emission tomography images. Deep learning model to predict Ki-67 expression of breast cancer using digital breast tomosynthesis. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer diagnosis and treatment trends in Japan. A nomogram to predict the benefit of postmastectomy radiotherapy in breast cancer with nodal micrometastases. Alcohol consumption and breast lesions: targets for risk-based screening in high-risk Italian women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1