Current Definitions of Return to Play After Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries and Surgery in Professional Baseball Players Prohibit Cross-Study Comparison: A Systematic Review
Timothy R. Buchanan B.S. , Andrew H.A. Kaiser B.S. , Keegan M. Hones M.D., M.S. , Sravya Kamarajugadda B.S. , Brandon Portnoff B.S. , Victoria E. Bindi B.S. , Jonathan O. Wright M.D. , Ryan P. Roach M.D. , Kevin W. Farmer M.D. , Xinning Li M.D. , Joseph J. King M.D. , Kevin A. Hao M.D.
{"title":"Current Definitions of Return to Play After Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries and Surgery in Professional Baseball Players Prohibit Cross-Study Comparison: A Systematic Review","authors":"Timothy R. Buchanan B.S. , Andrew H.A. Kaiser B.S. , Keegan M. Hones M.D., M.S. , Sravya Kamarajugadda B.S. , Brandon Portnoff B.S. , Victoria E. Bindi B.S. , Jonathan O. Wright M.D. , Ryan P. Roach M.D. , Kevin W. Farmer M.D. , Xinning Li M.D. , Joseph J. King M.D. , Kevin A. Hao M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess the definitions of return to play (RTP) and return to same level of play (RTSP) used in literature describing ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries in professional baseball players.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were queried to identify all articles that included UCL injuries between January 2002 and October 2022. Studies of only Major League Baseball (MLB) and Minor League Baseball (MiLB) players were included and summarized descriptively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 29 articles (24 reporting RTP, 23 reporting RTSP). Minimum level of play was not included in 46% of RTP definitions and 26% of RTSP definitions; when defined, return to MLB level only was most common in RTP definitions (25%) and return to either MLB or MiLB level was most common in RTSP definitions (39%). Time to return was frequently not included (96% of RTP and RTSP definitions); when defined, return within 2 full seasons after injury was the sole definition used. Duration of play after return was frequently not included (50% and 61%, respectively); when defined, a one game minimum was most used (42% and 17%, respectively). No study used performance measures (e.g., strikeouts, earned run average, etc.) to define RTP or RTSP.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Definitions of RTP and RTSP in the UCL injury literature for professional baseball players of all positions are vague, heterogenous, and prohibit cross-study comparison.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><div>The present study investigates the definitions for RTP and RTSP used across professional baseball UCL injury literature in hopes of identifying common threads to promote future cross-study comparison.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 9","pages":"Pages 3748-3755.e6"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806325000489","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To assess the definitions of return to play (RTP) and return to same level of play (RTSP) used in literature describing ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries in professional baseball players.
Methods
A systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were queried to identify all articles that included UCL injuries between January 2002 and October 2022. Studies of only Major League Baseball (MLB) and Minor League Baseball (MiLB) players were included and summarized descriptively.
Results
We included 29 articles (24 reporting RTP, 23 reporting RTSP). Minimum level of play was not included in 46% of RTP definitions and 26% of RTSP definitions; when defined, return to MLB level only was most common in RTP definitions (25%) and return to either MLB or MiLB level was most common in RTSP definitions (39%). Time to return was frequently not included (96% of RTP and RTSP definitions); when defined, return within 2 full seasons after injury was the sole definition used. Duration of play after return was frequently not included (50% and 61%, respectively); when defined, a one game minimum was most used (42% and 17%, respectively). No study used performance measures (e.g., strikeouts, earned run average, etc.) to define RTP or RTSP.
Conclusions
Definitions of RTP and RTSP in the UCL injury literature for professional baseball players of all positions are vague, heterogenous, and prohibit cross-study comparison.
Clinical Relevance
The present study investigates the definitions for RTP and RTSP used across professional baseball UCL injury literature in hopes of identifying common threads to promote future cross-study comparison.
目的:本综述评估了在描述职业棒球运动员UCL损伤的文献中使用的恢复比赛(RTP)和恢复到同一水平比赛(RTSP)的定义。方法:采用系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行系统评价。检索PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane数据库,以确定2002年1月至2022年10月期间包含UCL损伤的所有文章。研究只包括美国职业棒球大联盟(MLB)和美国职业棒球小联盟(MiLB)的球员,并进行了描述性的总结。结果:我们纳入了29篇文献,其中24篇报道RTP, 23篇报道RTSP。46%的RTP定义和26%的RTSP定义中没有包括最低游戏水平;当定义时,仅返回到MLB水平在RTP定义中最常见(25%),返回到MLB或MiLB水平在RTSP定义中最常见(39%)。通常不包括返回时间(96%的RTP和RTSP定义);当定义时,伤病后2个完整赛季内的回归是唯一的定义。返回后的游戏持续时间通常不包括在内(分别为50%和61%);当定义时,最少一款游戏的使用率最高(分别为42%和17%)。没有研究使用表现指标(例如,三振数、自责分率等)来定义RTP或RTSP。结论:所有职业棒球运动员UCL损伤文献中RTP和RTSP的定义是模糊的,异质性的,并且禁止交叉研究比较。临床相关性:本研究调查了职业棒球UCL损伤文献中RTP和RTSP的定义,希望找到共同点,以促进未来的交叉研究比较。
期刊介绍:
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.