Lateral Femoral Notch Sign Presence, Location, and Depth Are Not Associated With Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Failure: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.029
Anna M. Ifarraguerri B.S. , Michael S. Collins B.S. , Ainsley K. Bloomer M.D. , Kennedy K. Gachigi M.S. , David P. Trofa M.D. , Patrick N. Siparsky M.D. , Dana P. Piasecki M.D. , James E. Fleischli M.D. , Bryan M. Saltzman M.D.
{"title":"Lateral Femoral Notch Sign Presence, Location, and Depth Are Not Associated With Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Failure: A Retrospective Case-Control Study","authors":"Anna M. Ifarraguerri B.S. ,&nbsp;Michael S. Collins B.S. ,&nbsp;Ainsley K. Bloomer M.D. ,&nbsp;Kennedy K. Gachigi M.S. ,&nbsp;David P. Trofa M.D. ,&nbsp;Patrick N. Siparsky M.D. ,&nbsp;Dana P. Piasecki M.D. ,&nbsp;James E. Fleischli M.D. ,&nbsp;Bryan M. Saltzman M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess the relationship between the presence, depth, and location of the lateral femoral notch sign (LFNS) on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the risk of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction<span> (ACLR) graft failure, as well as secondary return to sport (RTS) endpoints.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>Patients with primary ACLR failure between 2012 and 2021 were identified and matched to patients without primary ACLR failure by sex, age, and body mass index<span>. Patients with incomplete medical records, inadequate follow-up, or concomitant lateral extra-articular </span></span>tenodesis<span> or anterolateral ligament reconstruction were excluded. The presence, depth, and location of the LFNS were recorded from patients' preoperative MRI. Intraoperative data, concomitant injuries, ACLR failure, and RTS were collected.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 253 included patients, 158 (62.5%) were male, the mean age was 22 ± 9.1 years old, and the mean body mass index was 25.7 ± 5.7. 87(34.4%) had a LFNS on preoperative MRI. There was no difference in the prevalence of the LFNS between patients with primary ACLR failure (42 [32.1%]) and without primary ACLR failure (45 [36.9%]) (odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 0.74-2.08; <em>P</em> = .42). Among patients with the LFNS, there was no difference in mean depth between those with and without primary ACLR failure, or when stratifying depth by 1.0-1.5 mm, 1.5-2.0 mm, and &gt;2.0 mm. The mean location of the LFNS from Blumensaat line did not differ between patients with or without primary ACLR failure, and RTS rate, level, and time were comparable between patients with and without the LFNS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There was no significant difference in the presence, depth or location of the LFNS in patients with and without primary ACLR failure. Presence of the LFNS is not associated with additional risk of primary ACLR failure, and clinical outcomes were comparable in patients with and without the LFNS.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level IV, retrospective case-control study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 9","pages":"Pages 3346-3355.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806325000477","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the relationship between the presence, depth, and location of the lateral femoral notch sign (LFNS) on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the risk of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) graft failure, as well as secondary return to sport (RTS) endpoints.

Methods

Patients with primary ACLR failure between 2012 and 2021 were identified and matched to patients without primary ACLR failure by sex, age, and body mass index. Patients with incomplete medical records, inadequate follow-up, or concomitant lateral extra-articular tenodesis or anterolateral ligament reconstruction were excluded. The presence, depth, and location of the LFNS were recorded from patients' preoperative MRI. Intraoperative data, concomitant injuries, ACLR failure, and RTS were collected.

Results

Of the 253 included patients, 158 (62.5%) were male, the mean age was 22 ± 9.1 years old, and the mean body mass index was 25.7 ± 5.7. 87(34.4%) had a LFNS on preoperative MRI. There was no difference in the prevalence of the LFNS between patients with primary ACLR failure (42 [32.1%]) and without primary ACLR failure (45 [36.9%]) (odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 0.74-2.08; P = .42). Among patients with the LFNS, there was no difference in mean depth between those with and without primary ACLR failure, or when stratifying depth by 1.0-1.5 mm, 1.5-2.0 mm, and >2.0 mm. The mean location of the LFNS from Blumensaat line did not differ between patients with or without primary ACLR failure, and RTS rate, level, and time were comparable between patients with and without the LFNS.

Conclusions

There was no significant difference in the presence, depth or location of the LFNS in patients with and without primary ACLR failure. Presence of the LFNS is not associated with additional risk of primary ACLR failure, and clinical outcomes were comparable in patients with and without the LFNS.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, retrospective case-control study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股骨外侧切迹的存在、位置和深度与原发性前交叉韧带重建失败无关:一项回顾性病例-对照研究。
目的:本研究的目的是评估术前MRI上股骨外侧切迹(LFNS)的存在、深度和位置与ACL重建(ACLR)移植物失败的风险以及二次运动恢复(RTS)终点之间的关系。方法:对2012年至2021年期间发生原发性ACLR衰竭的患者进行至少2年的随访,并根据性别、年龄和BMI与未发生原发性ACLR衰竭的患者进行匹配。排除医疗记录不完整或伴有外侧关节外肌腱固定术或前外侧韧带重建的患者。术前MRI记录LFNS的存在、深度和位置。收集术中数据、伴随损伤、ACLR失败和恢复运动(RTS)。结果:253例患者中,男性158例(62.5%),平均年龄22±9.1岁,平均体重指数(BMI) 25.7±5.7 kg/m2。87例(34.4%)患者术前MRI表现为LFNS。原发性ACLR衰竭患者(42例(32.1%))和非原发性ACLR衰竭患者(45例(36.9%))的LFNS患病率无差异(OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.74 ~ 2.08;P = 0.42)。在LFNS患者中,有和没有原发性ACLR衰竭的患者,以及按1.0-1.5mm、1.5-2.0mm和>2.0mm分层的患者,其平均深度没有差异。来自Blumensaat线的LFNS的平均位置在有或没有原发性ACLR衰竭的患者之间没有差异,有和没有LFNS的患者之间的RTS率、水平和时间是相似的。结论:原发性ACLR衰竭患者与非原发性ACLR衰竭患者LFNS的存在、深度和位置无显著差异。LFNS的存在与原发性ACLR衰竭的额外风险无关,并且有和没有LFNS的患者的临床结果是相似的。证据水平:回顾性病例对照研究;4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Pressed Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Autograft Augmentation Enhances Tendon-to-Bone Healing in a Rat Model of Rotator Cuff Repair. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Versus Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Results in No Significant Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures, Re-Rupture Rates, and Clinical Stability: A Meta-analysis of Level I Randomized Control Trials. Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Pathology Have Higher Complication Rates of Adhesive Capsulitis than Alternative Injectable Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Editorial Commentary: Suture Anchor Fixation for Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Repair Continues to Show Biomechanical Favorability, but It Is Not Yet Time to Toss the Tibial Tunnel. Suture Anchor Technique Shows Superior Biomechanical Properties Compared With Transtibial Pull-Out for Posterior Medial Meniscus Root Repairs: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1