Perspectives of medicine, human biology, and nursing undergraduates on transversal skills learning: a mixed-methods study.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06749-z
Nathalia Silva Fontana-Rosa, Luis González-de Paz, Ana C Codina-Rodríguez, María Pérez-Riart, María Del Mar Carrió-Llach
{"title":"Perspectives of medicine, human biology, and nursing undergraduates on transversal skills learning: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Nathalia Silva Fontana-Rosa, Luis González-de Paz, Ana C Codina-Rodríguez, María Pérez-Riart, María Del Mar Carrió-Llach","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06749-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In health sciences practice, interpersonal skills, critical thinking, and learning-to-learn are crucial transversal skills. Effective teaching necessitates the understanding of undergraduates' views. This study explored undergraduate experiences in human biology, medicine, and nursing degrees in learning transversal skills.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An exploratory sequential mixed method design with qualitative data collection and a subsequent online survey study. Three focus groups were conducted with third- and fourth-year undergraduates, and data were analyzed with thematic analysis. The online survey targeted undergraduate students from all academic years to address inconclusive details. Analysis entailed descriptive statistics, and associations differences in responses by degrees were analyzed using chi-square tests or Fisher's Exact Test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen undergraduates participated in focus groups and 159 in the online survey. Three thematic areas emerged: the training received and its perceived relevance, the evaluation, and the learning methods. Undergraduates expressed that transversal skills were necessary for self-personal growth and professional development; however 50.7% reported not receiving specific training. Human biology and medicine undergraduates reported less training in critical thinking compared to nursing (29.03% and 32.7% vs. 76%, p < 0.001) and in interpersonal and relational skills (16.1% and 16.3% vs. 57%, p < 0.001). Subjectivity is an issue compared to traditional testing, with 39.6% of undergraduates reporting knowing the assessment methods of transversal skills and 56% trusting the preparation of teaching staff. >80% of undegraduate students wanted more participatory methodologies -from classroom methodology to problem-based assessments and simulation, while plenary lectures and gamification were less preferred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Health sciences undergraduates advocated for effectively integrating transversal skills in their programs. Nursing undergraduates showed higher satisfaction and expressed having experienced more transversal skills learning than human biology and medicine undergraduates. Undergraduates required educators to receive more support and training in adopting methodologies that facilitate transversal skill acquisition through changes in the assessment methods and substantive transformation of the program curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"162"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06749-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In health sciences practice, interpersonal skills, critical thinking, and learning-to-learn are crucial transversal skills. Effective teaching necessitates the understanding of undergraduates' views. This study explored undergraduate experiences in human biology, medicine, and nursing degrees in learning transversal skills.

Methods: An exploratory sequential mixed method design with qualitative data collection and a subsequent online survey study. Three focus groups were conducted with third- and fourth-year undergraduates, and data were analyzed with thematic analysis. The online survey targeted undergraduate students from all academic years to address inconclusive details. Analysis entailed descriptive statistics, and associations differences in responses by degrees were analyzed using chi-square tests or Fisher's Exact Test.

Results: Thirteen undergraduates participated in focus groups and 159 in the online survey. Three thematic areas emerged: the training received and its perceived relevance, the evaluation, and the learning methods. Undergraduates expressed that transversal skills were necessary for self-personal growth and professional development; however 50.7% reported not receiving specific training. Human biology and medicine undergraduates reported less training in critical thinking compared to nursing (29.03% and 32.7% vs. 76%, p < 0.001) and in interpersonal and relational skills (16.1% and 16.3% vs. 57%, p < 0.001). Subjectivity is an issue compared to traditional testing, with 39.6% of undergraduates reporting knowing the assessment methods of transversal skills and 56% trusting the preparation of teaching staff. >80% of undegraduate students wanted more participatory methodologies -from classroom methodology to problem-based assessments and simulation, while plenary lectures and gamification were less preferred.

Conclusion: Health sciences undergraduates advocated for effectively integrating transversal skills in their programs. Nursing undergraduates showed higher satisfaction and expressed having experienced more transversal skills learning than human biology and medicine undergraduates. Undergraduates required educators to receive more support and training in adopting methodologies that facilitate transversal skill acquisition through changes in the assessment methods and substantive transformation of the program curricula.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学、人类生物学和护理本科生对横向技能学习的看法:一项混合方法研究。
背景:在健康科学实践中,人际交往能力、批判性思维和学会学习是至关重要的横向技能。有效的教学需要理解大学生的观点。本研究探讨了人类生物学、医学和护理学本科学生在学习横向技能方面的经验。方法:采用探索性顺序混合方法设计,采用定性数据收集和随后的在线调查研究。对三年级和四年级本科生进行了三个焦点小组调查,并对数据进行了专题分析。这项在线调查针对所有学年的本科生,以解决不确定的细节。分析采用描述性统计,不同程度反应的关联差异采用卡方检验或费雪精确检验进行分析。结果:13名大学生参与焦点小组调查,159名大学生参与网络调查。出现了三个主题领域:所接受的培训及其认识到的相关性、评价和学习方法。大学生表示横向技能是个人成长和专业发展所必需的;然而,50.7%的人表示没有接受过专门的培训。与护理学相比,人类生物学和医学本科生在批判性思维方面的训练较少(29.03%和32.7%对76%,p 80%的本科生想要更多的参与性方法——从课堂方法到基于问题的评估和模拟,而全体讲座和游戏化则不太受欢迎。结论:健康科学本科生提倡在课程中有效整合横向技能。护理本科学生满意度和横向技能学习体验均高于人类生物学和医学本科学生。本科生要求教育工作者在采用方法方面得到更多的支持和培训,这些方法通过评估方法的改变和项目课程的实质性转变来促进横向技能的获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Application of large language models in medical interview training: a study with medical students. Association between resident physicians from foreign medical schools and general medicine in-training examination scores: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan. The relationship between socioeconomic status and the career calling of medical students: the chain mediation effect of social support and subjective social status. Factors influencing the choice of specialty by medical students in a new university in Rwanda. Forming meaningful connections: a cross-sectional survey of hybrid doctor of physical therapy students' belonging, well-being, and program recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1