Enhancing support for new nursing faculty: an extensive scoping review of mentoring practices

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Nurse Education Today Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106595
Loira Fernández-Lorente , Julián Rodríguez-Almagro , Antonio Hernández-Martínez
{"title":"Enhancing support for new nursing faculty: an extensive scoping review of mentoring practices","authors":"Loira Fernández-Lorente ,&nbsp;Julián Rodríguez-Almagro ,&nbsp;Antonio Hernández-Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Understanding the state of mentoring in academic nursing is critical to identifying beneficial practices. Mentoring programs are critical in equipping new faculty in nursing with the necessary teaching competencies and professional skills.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This review aims to identify the existence of mentorship programs for new nursing faculty and to analyze key characteristics such as the mentorship models employed, the tools and surveys utilized, the theories and concepts developed around mentorship, and the evaluation and development of the programs themselves. Additionally, the aim was to examine the outcomes and impact of these programs in areas such as faculty retention, the development of teaching competencies, job satisfaction, and the consolidation of new educators' roles within the academic setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The search in the PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Clinical trial and SCOPUS databases included articles on newly appointed nurses in mentoring programs. Quality was assessed using the Hawker and Payne criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighteen articles (2016–2023) were analyzed, and the following topics were identified: Support and appreciation in mentoring, need for role clarity, personal and professional development, perceptions of mentoring effectiveness, quality of communication, mentoring models and impact on job satisfaction and retention.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The report offers insights into academic mentorship in nursing and highlights its benefits and challenges, such as the need for effective communication and clearly defined roles. Mentoring is effective for developing skills and competencies but faces challenges in terms of perception and structure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 106595"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691725000309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Understanding the state of mentoring in academic nursing is critical to identifying beneficial practices. Mentoring programs are critical in equipping new faculty in nursing with the necessary teaching competencies and professional skills.

Purpose

This review aims to identify the existence of mentorship programs for new nursing faculty and to analyze key characteristics such as the mentorship models employed, the tools and surveys utilized, the theories and concepts developed around mentorship, and the evaluation and development of the programs themselves. Additionally, the aim was to examine the outcomes and impact of these programs in areas such as faculty retention, the development of teaching competencies, job satisfaction, and the consolidation of new educators' roles within the academic setting.

Methods

The search in the PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Clinical trial and SCOPUS databases included articles on newly appointed nurses in mentoring programs. Quality was assessed using the Hawker and Payne criteria.

Results

Eighteen articles (2016–2023) were analyzed, and the following topics were identified: Support and appreciation in mentoring, need for role clarity, personal and professional development, perceptions of mentoring effectiveness, quality of communication, mentoring models and impact on job satisfaction and retention.

Conclusions

The report offers insights into academic mentorship in nursing and highlights its benefits and challenges, such as the need for effective communication and clearly defined roles. Mentoring is effective for developing skills and competencies but faces challenges in terms of perception and structure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加强对新护理教师的支持:对指导实践的广泛范围审查。
背景:了解学术护理指导的状态是识别有益实践的关键。指导计划对于为护理新教师提供必要的教学能力和专业技能至关重要。目的:本综述旨在确定新护理教师师徒计划的存在,并分析其主要特征,如采用的师徒模式、使用的工具和调查、围绕师徒关系发展的理论和概念,以及项目本身的评估和发展。此外,目的是检查这些项目在教师留任、教学能力发展、工作满意度和新教育者在学术环境中的角色巩固等方面的结果和影响。方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane、EMBASE、临床试验和SCOPUS数据库,纳入新入职护士指导项目的相关文章。质量评估采用霍克和佩恩标准。结果:对2016-2023年的18篇文章进行了分析,确定了以下主题:师徒关系中的支持和欣赏、角色明晰的需求、个人和职业发展、对师徒关系有效性的看法、沟通质量、师徒关系模式以及对工作满意度和留任的影响。结论:该报告提供了对护理学术指导的见解,并强调了其好处和挑战,例如需要有效的沟通和明确的角色定义。指导对于发展技能和能力是有效的,但在感知和结构方面面临挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
Constructing digital professionalism in the generative AI era: A qualitative study with nursing students and faculty. Insights from an interprofessional education course- a mixed methods study among novice healthcare professionals. Gender-affirming communication in nursing education: Development and preliminary validation of a CICARE-based digital microlearning system. "Is GenAI my supervisor?" Experiences of nursing undergraduates in using generative AI to assist in case study theses: A qualitative study. Nurse educators' experiences integrating artificial intelligence in teaching and practice: A descriptive phenomenological study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1