Sports Medicine Surgeons Utilize Social Media to Network With Other Surgeons and Increase Patient Engagement: A Scoping Review.

Udit Dave, Harshal Shah, Jayanth Mosalakanti, Pavan Guduri, Ayobami T Adeagbo, Mia V Rumps, Shreya M Saraf, Mary K Mulcahey
{"title":"Sports Medicine Surgeons Utilize Social Media to Network With Other Surgeons and Increase Patient Engagement: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Udit Dave, Harshal Shah, Jayanth Mosalakanti, Pavan Guduri, Ayobami T Adeagbo, Mia V Rumps, Shreya M Saraf, Mary K Mulcahey","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this scoping review was to identify how social media is used by sports medicine surgeons and how this is perceived by patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched in April 2024 for studies published after 2014. Studies were included if they met these criteria: evaluated sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons, evaluated patient preferences regarding social media use among these surgeons, reported purpose of social media use, and were written in English. Studies that were not written in English, did not specifically evaluate sports medicine surgeons, or evaluated a singular procedure were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search identified 328 studies, 6 of which were included in this scoping review, each of which were cross-sectional studies. Four (67%) studies evaluated how sports medicine surgeons use social media and two (33%) evaluated patient experiences of consuming surgeons' social media content. Twitter was the most popular social media site among sports medicine orthopaedic surgeons with online social media presence scores in the top 10%. Academic sports medicine surgeons were more likely than non-academic surgeons to be active on social media. Increased Twitter use was correlated with increased research productivity and citation impact. Patients were interested in educational videos and live question-answer sessions from their sports medicine surgeons, irrespective of platform used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Twitter and YouTube are popular platforms among sports medicine surgeons, particularly for professional networking and patient education. However, Instagram has emerged as the leading platform in terms of user engagement, making it an effective tool for fostering patient interaction and promoting clinical practice. These findings suggest that surgeons should prioritize Instagram alongside other platforms to effectively enhance their professional presence.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III, systematic review of Level III studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this scoping review was to identify how social media is used by sports medicine surgeons and how this is perceived by patients.

Methods: In accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched in April 2024 for studies published after 2014. Studies were included if they met these criteria: evaluated sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons, evaluated patient preferences regarding social media use among these surgeons, reported purpose of social media use, and were written in English. Studies that were not written in English, did not specifically evaluate sports medicine surgeons, or evaluated a singular procedure were excluded.

Results: The initial search identified 328 studies, 6 of which were included in this scoping review, each of which were cross-sectional studies. Four (67%) studies evaluated how sports medicine surgeons use social media and two (33%) evaluated patient experiences of consuming surgeons' social media content. Twitter was the most popular social media site among sports medicine orthopaedic surgeons with online social media presence scores in the top 10%. Academic sports medicine surgeons were more likely than non-academic surgeons to be active on social media. Increased Twitter use was correlated with increased research productivity and citation impact. Patients were interested in educational videos and live question-answer sessions from their sports medicine surgeons, irrespective of platform used.

Conclusions: Twitter and YouTube are popular platforms among sports medicine surgeons, particularly for professional networking and patient education. However, Instagram has emerged as the leading platform in terms of user engagement, making it an effective tool for fostering patient interaction and promoting clinical practice. These findings suggest that surgeons should prioritize Instagram alongside other platforms to effectively enhance their professional presence.

Level of evidence: III, systematic review of Level III studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum Corrigendum Announcements Editorial Board Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1