Postoperative course of Eustachian tube plug surgery with Kobayashi plug

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Auris Nasus Larynx Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.anl.2024.12.006
Tomoo Shibasaki , Naoto Koike , Hidefumi Shindo , Ryoji Hirai , Takeshi Oshima
{"title":"Postoperative course of Eustachian tube plug surgery with Kobayashi plug","authors":"Tomoo Shibasaki ,&nbsp;Naoto Koike ,&nbsp;Hidefumi Shindo ,&nbsp;Ryoji Hirai ,&nbsp;Takeshi Oshima","doi":"10.1016/j.anl.2024.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate its effectiveness and safety and clarify the postoperative course of Kobayashi plug surgery for refractory patulous Eustachian tubes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included 83 patients diagnosed with a patulous Eustachian tube who received Kobayashi plug surgery at our hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At 1 month postoperatively, the success rate was 74.0 %; at 3 months, it was 67.1 %; at 6 months, it was 65.0 %; and at 12 months it was 65.2 %. At 6 months, otitis media with effusion (OME) was observed in 12.5 % of cases, and residual tympanic membrane perforation was observed in 5.0 %. Ventilation tube placement was performed in 10 cases, and eight cases required revision surgery. During the course, plugs were removed in four cases.</div><div>Median values of patulous Eustachian Tube Handicap Inventory-10 (PHI-10) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were 14, 16, 16, and 20, respectively. PHI-10 significantly improved at all the time points after surgery than before surgery (median 33).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The Kobayashi plug surgery is safe and effective for refractory patulous Eustachian tubes over the long term. At 6 months postoperatively, there were few cases of OME, and the symptoms also stabilized.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55627,"journal":{"name":"Auris Nasus Larynx","volume":"52 2","pages":"Pages 116-121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auris Nasus Larynx","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0385814624001536","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate its effectiveness and safety and clarify the postoperative course of Kobayashi plug surgery for refractory patulous Eustachian tubes.

Methods

This retrospective study included 83 patients diagnosed with a patulous Eustachian tube who received Kobayashi plug surgery at our hospital.

Results

At 1 month postoperatively, the success rate was 74.0 %; at 3 months, it was 67.1 %; at 6 months, it was 65.0 %; and at 12 months it was 65.2 %. At 6 months, otitis media with effusion (OME) was observed in 12.5 % of cases, and residual tympanic membrane perforation was observed in 5.0 %. Ventilation tube placement was performed in 10 cases, and eight cases required revision surgery. During the course, plugs were removed in four cases.
Median values of patulous Eustachian Tube Handicap Inventory-10 (PHI-10) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were 14, 16, 16, and 20, respectively. PHI-10 significantly improved at all the time points after surgery than before surgery (median 33).

Conclusion

The Kobayashi plug surgery is safe and effective for refractory patulous Eustachian tubes over the long term. At 6 months postoperatively, there were few cases of OME, and the symptoms also stabilized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小林塞咽鼓管封堵术的术后过程。
目的:探讨小林塞手术治疗难治性咽鼓管扩张性的有效性和安全性,明确其术后过程。方法:回顾性研究83例在我院行小林塞手术诊断为咽鼓管扩张的患者。结果:术后1个月,手术成功率为74.0%;3个月时为67.1%;6个月时为65.0%;12个月时,这一比例为65.2%。6个月时,12.5%的病例出现中耳炎伴积液(OME), 5.0%的病例出现残余鼓膜穿孔。10例行通气管置入,8例行翻修手术。在此过程中,有4例患者的耳塞被移除。术后1、3、6、12个月扩张性咽鼓管障碍指数-10 (PHI-10)的中位值分别为14、16、16、20。术后各时间点pi -10均较术前明显改善(中位33)。结论:小林塞手术治疗难治性咽鼓管扩张长期安全有效。术后6个月,OME病例较少,症状也趋于稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Auris Nasus Larynx
Auris Nasus Larynx 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: The international journal Auris Nasus Larynx provides the opportunity for rapid, carefully reviewed publications concerning the fundamental and clinical aspects of otorhinolaryngology and related fields. This includes otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, allergology, head and neck medicine and oncologic surgery, maxillofacial and plastic surgery, audiology, speech science. Original papers, short communications and original case reports can be submitted. Reviews on recent developments are invited regularly and Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Auris Nasus Larynx are welcomed. Founded in 1973 and previously published by the Society for Promotion of International Otorhinolaryngology, the journal is now the official English-language journal of the Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Society of Japan, Inc. The aim of its new international Editorial Board is to make Auris Nasus Larynx an international forum for high quality research and clinical sciences.
期刊最新文献
Repetitive post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage subsequently diagnosed as lupus anticoagulant-associated coagulopathy in a child. Vestibular assessment in definite cerebellar Ataxia, Neuropathy, Vestibular Areflexia Syndrome (CANVAS): A case of siblings study. Additive effect of free-choice olfactory training combined with pharmacotherapy: A retrospective analysis of post-viral olfactory dysfunction. Proportion of middle ear surgeries feasible via transcanal endoscopic ear surgery: A multicenter study in Japan. Acoustic assessment of dysphonia: Current practice and future directions - A narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1