“The ladies in bloomers who gardened at Kew”: Pioneer professional women gardeners in late nineteenth century England

IF 0.5 4区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Endeavour Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.endeavour.2025.100979
Derek Turner
{"title":"“The ladies in bloomers who gardened at Kew”: Pioneer professional women gardeners in late nineteenth century England","authors":"Derek Turner","doi":"10.1016/j.endeavour.2025.100979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The arrival of two young women gardeners at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew in 1896 marked a watershed in English history of professional gardening. Assisted by new opportunities in science education for women, especially the horticultural training colleges for women like the pioneering, model campus established at Swanley, Kent, and by the willingness of the director at Kew to conduct the “experiment” of admitting women as gardeners, Annie Gulvin, Alice Hutchings, and the eight other women who followed them to Kew until 1903, demonstrated that their gardening knowledge and skills equalled those of the Kew men. The women students proved that they could obtain senior horticultural posts on completing their training, thus providing role models and inspiration for the rapidly increasing number of professional women gardeners who followed their example. The lives and careers of the Kew ladies confirm the findings of other scholars of the resistance by the male horticultural establishment to allowing women into their profession but nuances the view that it was only middle-class women who were able to achieve this break-through, demonstrating that the more important cause of their success, other than their own personal qualities, was access to a good scientific education independent of social class. This article offers an unprecedented analysis of the pioneering Kew ladies’ backgrounds, education, career outcomes, and impact in the gendered, professional world of horticulture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51032,"journal":{"name":"Endeavour","volume":"49 1","pages":"Article 100979"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endeavour","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016093272500002X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The arrival of two young women gardeners at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew in 1896 marked a watershed in English history of professional gardening. Assisted by new opportunities in science education for women, especially the horticultural training colleges for women like the pioneering, model campus established at Swanley, Kent, and by the willingness of the director at Kew to conduct the “experiment” of admitting women as gardeners, Annie Gulvin, Alice Hutchings, and the eight other women who followed them to Kew until 1903, demonstrated that their gardening knowledge and skills equalled those of the Kew men. The women students proved that they could obtain senior horticultural posts on completing their training, thus providing role models and inspiration for the rapidly increasing number of professional women gardeners who followed their example. The lives and careers of the Kew ladies confirm the findings of other scholars of the resistance by the male horticultural establishment to allowing women into their profession but nuances the view that it was only middle-class women who were able to achieve this break-through, demonstrating that the more important cause of their success, other than their own personal qualities, was access to a good scientific education independent of social class. This article offers an unprecedented analysis of the pioneering Kew ladies’ backgrounds, education, career outcomes, and impact in the gendered, professional world of horticulture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endeavour
Endeavour 综合性期刊-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
19
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Endeavour, established in 1942, has, over its long and proud history, developed into one of the leading journals in the history and philosophy of science. Endeavour publishes high-quality articles on a wide array of scientific topics from ancient to modern, across all disciplines. It serves as a critical forum for the interdisciplinary exploration and evaluation of natural knowledge and its development throughout history. Each issue contains lavish color and black-and-white illustrations. This makes Endeavour an ideal destination for history and philosophy of science articles with a strong visual component. Endeavour presents the history and philosophy of science in a clear and accessible manner, ensuring the journal is a valuable tool for historians, philosophers, practicing scientists, and general readers. To enable it to have the broadest coverage possible, Endeavour features four types of articles: -Research articles are concise, fully referenced, and beautifully illustrated with high quality reproductions of the most important source material. -In Vivo articles will illustrate the rich and numerous connections between historical and philosophical scholarship and matters of current public interest, and provide rich, readable explanations of important current events from historical and philosophical perspectives. -Book Reviews and Commentaries provide a picture of the rapidly growing history of science discipline. Written by both established and emerging scholars, our reviews provide a vibrant overview of the latest publications and media in the history and philosophy of science. -Lost and Found Pieces are playful and creative short essays which focus on objects, theories, tools, and methods that have been significant to science but underappreciated by collective memory.
期刊最新文献
Review of Emma K. Sutton, William James, MD: Philosopher, Psychologist, Physician. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2023. 261 pp. ISBN 9780226828961 Editorial Board The gendering of agriculture in late nineteenth century colonial Hokkaido: The case of Kane Watanabe (1859–1945)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1