Preoperative gait pattern as predictor of gait changes following selective dorsal rhizotomy

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Gait & posture Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.01.017
Liza M.M. van Dijk , Kirsten Veerkamp , Marjolein M. van der Krogt , K. Mariam Slot , Annemieke I. Buizer
{"title":"Preoperative gait pattern as predictor of gait changes following selective dorsal rhizotomy","authors":"Liza M.M. van Dijk ,&nbsp;Kirsten Veerkamp ,&nbsp;Marjolein M. van der Krogt ,&nbsp;K. Mariam Slot ,&nbsp;Annemieke I. Buizer","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.01.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) can improve gait in children with spastic paresis. However, outcomes vary, and selecting individuals who will benefit from the procedure remains challenging. How pre-SDR gait pattern predicts post-SDR gait has not previously been investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><div>This study aims to compare how different gait patterns change after SDR to gain insight into the potential relevance of gait patterns as a selection criterion for SDR.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Kinematic and kinetic data of nineteen children with bilateral spastic paresis due to cerebral palsy or hereditary spastic paraplegia, with 3D gait analysis before and two years after SDR, were extracted from an in-hospital database. A cluster analysis was performed to distinguish different gait patterns based on sagittal hip, knee and ankle angles pre-SDR. Deviations from typical gait per leg (38 legs) pre- and post-SDR were quantified with the Gait Profile Score (GPS), calculated for joint angles, moments, and powers. GPS was compared pre- and post-SDR per gait pattern, and pre-post differences were compared between gait patterns.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three distinct pre-SDR gait patterns (GPs) were identified using cluster analysis, with GP1 characterized by increased knee flexion (18 legs), GP2 by increased ankle plantarflexion (14 legs), and GP3 by increased knee flexion and increased ankle plantarflexion (6 legs). GPS-kinematics improved significantly for GP1 (-3.1°) and GP3 (-6.6°), but showed no significant change for GP2. GPS-kinematics improved significantly more in GP3 than in GP2. GPS-moments improved equally in all groups (-0.04Nm/kg--0.07Nm/kg). GPS-powers improved significantly more for GP1 and GP2 (0.07W/kg and 0.24W/kg, respectively) than for GP3 where no change occurred.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>The results suggest that different pre-SDR gait patterns have distinct outcomes post-SDR in children with spastic paresis. Therefore gait patterns could guide selection and expectation management for SDR. Future studies should confirm these results in a larger cohort.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"117 ","pages":"Pages 363-371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225000177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) can improve gait in children with spastic paresis. However, outcomes vary, and selecting individuals who will benefit from the procedure remains challenging. How pre-SDR gait pattern predicts post-SDR gait has not previously been investigated.

Research question

This study aims to compare how different gait patterns change after SDR to gain insight into the potential relevance of gait patterns as a selection criterion for SDR.

Methods

Kinematic and kinetic data of nineteen children with bilateral spastic paresis due to cerebral palsy or hereditary spastic paraplegia, with 3D gait analysis before and two years after SDR, were extracted from an in-hospital database. A cluster analysis was performed to distinguish different gait patterns based on sagittal hip, knee and ankle angles pre-SDR. Deviations from typical gait per leg (38 legs) pre- and post-SDR were quantified with the Gait Profile Score (GPS), calculated for joint angles, moments, and powers. GPS was compared pre- and post-SDR per gait pattern, and pre-post differences were compared between gait patterns.

Results

Three distinct pre-SDR gait patterns (GPs) were identified using cluster analysis, with GP1 characterized by increased knee flexion (18 legs), GP2 by increased ankle plantarflexion (14 legs), and GP3 by increased knee flexion and increased ankle plantarflexion (6 legs). GPS-kinematics improved significantly for GP1 (-3.1°) and GP3 (-6.6°), but showed no significant change for GP2. GPS-kinematics improved significantly more in GP3 than in GP2. GPS-moments improved equally in all groups (-0.04Nm/kg--0.07Nm/kg). GPS-powers improved significantly more for GP1 and GP2 (0.07W/kg and 0.24W/kg, respectively) than for GP3 where no change occurred.

Significance

The results suggest that different pre-SDR gait patterns have distinct outcomes post-SDR in children with spastic paresis. Therefore gait patterns could guide selection and expectation management for SDR. Future studies should confirm these results in a larger cohort.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术前步态模式作为选择性背根切断术后步态变化的预测因子。
背景:选择性背根切断术(SDR)可以改善痉挛性轻瘫患儿的步态。然而,结果各不相同,选择将从手术中受益的个体仍然具有挑战性。sdr前的步态模式如何预测sdr后的步态以前没有研究过。研究问题:本研究旨在比较不同步态模式在SDR后的变化,以深入了解步态模式作为SDR选择标准的潜在相关性。方法:从医院数据库中提取19例脑瘫或遗传性痉挛性截瘫患儿的运动学和动力学数据,以及SDR术前和术后2年的三维步态分析。基于矢状髋关节、膝关节和踝关节角度进行聚类分析,区分不同的步态模式。采用步态特征评分(GPS)对sdr前后每条腿(38条腿)的典型步态偏差进行量化,计算关节角度、力矩和功率。比较每种步态模式的GPS定位前后的差异,并比较步态模式前后的差异。结果:通过聚类分析确定了三种不同的sdr前步态模式(GPs), GP1的特征是膝关节屈曲增加(18条腿),GP2的特征是踝关节屈曲增加(14条腿),GP3的特征是膝关节屈曲增加和踝关节屈曲增加(6条腿)。gpp1(-3.1°)和GP3(-6.6°)的gps -运动学显著改善,但GP2没有显著变化。GP3的gps -运动学改善明显大于GP2。各组的gps力矩均有相同的改善(-0.04Nm/kg—0.07Nm/kg)。与GP3相比,GP1和GP2的gps功率显著提高(分别为0.07W/kg和0.24W/kg), GP3没有变化。意义:结果表明,sdr前不同的步态模式对痉挛性轻瘫儿童在sdr后的预后有不同的影响。因此,步态模式可以指导SDR的选择和期望管理。未来的研究应该在更大的队列中证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gait & posture
Gait & posture 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
616
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance. The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Markerless motion capture affects talocrural joint frontal plane interpretation The effects of vision and multiple cognitive tasks on pre-landing and early landing mechanics associated with ACL loading The effect of rebound therapy in Parkinson’s disease: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial Design, mechanical evaluation, and wear trial of 3D printed insole for plantar off-loading in older adults with diabetes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1