Preoperative gait pattern as predictor of gait changes following selective dorsal rhizotomy.

Liza M M van Dijk, Kirsten Veerkamp, Marjolein M van der Krogt, K Mariam Slot, Annemieke I Buizer
{"title":"Preoperative gait pattern as predictor of gait changes following selective dorsal rhizotomy.","authors":"Liza M M van Dijk, Kirsten Veerkamp, Marjolein M van der Krogt, K Mariam Slot, Annemieke I Buizer","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.01.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) can improve gait in children with spastic paresis. However, outcomes vary, and selecting individuals who will benefit from the procedure remains challenging. How pre-SDR gait pattern predicts post-SDR gait has not previously been investigated.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>This study aims to compare how different gait patterns change after SDR to gain insight into the potential relevance of gait patterns as a selection criterion for SDR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Kinematic and kinetic data of nineteen children with bilateral spastic paresis due to cerebral palsy or hereditary spastic paraplegia, with 3D gait analysis before and two years after SDR, were extracted from an in-hospital database. A cluster analysis was performed to distinguish different gait patterns based on sagittal hip, knee and ankle angles pre-SDR. Deviations from typical gait per leg (38 legs) pre- and post-SDR were quantified with the Gait Profile Score (GPS), calculated for joint angles, moments, and powers. GPS was compared pre- and post-SDR per gait pattern, and pre-post differences were compared between gait patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three distinct pre-SDR gait patterns (GPs) were identified using cluster analysis, with GP1 characterized by increased knee flexion (18 legs), GP2 by increased ankle plantarflexion (14 legs), and GP3 by increased knee flexion and increased ankle plantarflexion (6 legs). GPS-kinematics improved significantly for GP1 (-3.1°) and GP3 (-6.6°), but showed no significant change for GP2. GPS-kinematics improved significantly more in GP3 than in GP2. GPS-moments improved equally in all groups (-0.04Nm/kg--0.07Nm/kg). GPS-powers improved significantly more for GP1 and GP2 (0.07W/kg and 0.24W/kg, respectively) than for GP3 where no change occurred.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>The results suggest that different pre-SDR gait patterns have distinct outcomes post-SDR in children with spastic paresis. Therefore gait patterns could guide selection and expectation management for SDR. Future studies should confirm these results in a larger cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"117 ","pages":"363-371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.01.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) can improve gait in children with spastic paresis. However, outcomes vary, and selecting individuals who will benefit from the procedure remains challenging. How pre-SDR gait pattern predicts post-SDR gait has not previously been investigated.

Research question: This study aims to compare how different gait patterns change after SDR to gain insight into the potential relevance of gait patterns as a selection criterion for SDR.

Methods: Kinematic and kinetic data of nineteen children with bilateral spastic paresis due to cerebral palsy or hereditary spastic paraplegia, with 3D gait analysis before and two years after SDR, were extracted from an in-hospital database. A cluster analysis was performed to distinguish different gait patterns based on sagittal hip, knee and ankle angles pre-SDR. Deviations from typical gait per leg (38 legs) pre- and post-SDR were quantified with the Gait Profile Score (GPS), calculated for joint angles, moments, and powers. GPS was compared pre- and post-SDR per gait pattern, and pre-post differences were compared between gait patterns.

Results: Three distinct pre-SDR gait patterns (GPs) were identified using cluster analysis, with GP1 characterized by increased knee flexion (18 legs), GP2 by increased ankle plantarflexion (14 legs), and GP3 by increased knee flexion and increased ankle plantarflexion (6 legs). GPS-kinematics improved significantly for GP1 (-3.1°) and GP3 (-6.6°), but showed no significant change for GP2. GPS-kinematics improved significantly more in GP3 than in GP2. GPS-moments improved equally in all groups (-0.04Nm/kg--0.07Nm/kg). GPS-powers improved significantly more for GP1 and GP2 (0.07W/kg and 0.24W/kg, respectively) than for GP3 where no change occurred.

Significance: The results suggest that different pre-SDR gait patterns have distinct outcomes post-SDR in children with spastic paresis. Therefore gait patterns could guide selection and expectation management for SDR. Future studies should confirm these results in a larger cohort.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preoperative gait pattern as predictor of gait changes following selective dorsal rhizotomy. How do neuromuscular characteristics of the peroneal muscles differ in adults with and without chronic ankle instability? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Predicting lower body joint moments and electromyography signals using ground reaction forces during walking and running: An artificial neural network approach. Editorial for the Special Issue: "Wearable sensors for movement analysis in real-world environments: applications in clinical populations and disease management". Weak trunk extensors in adult spinal deformity patients are related to sagittal malalignment and kinematic limitations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1