Technoeconomic analysis of low-emission steelmaking using hydrogen thermal plasma

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Cleaner Production Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144896
Christopher Cooper, Geoffrey Brooks, M. Akbar Rhamdhani, John Pye, Alireza Rahbari
{"title":"Technoeconomic analysis of low-emission steelmaking using hydrogen thermal plasma","authors":"Christopher Cooper, Geoffrey Brooks, M. Akbar Rhamdhani, John Pye, Alireza Rahbari","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hydrogen thermal plasma has been identified as a possible breakthrough pathway for low-CO<sub>2</sub>-emission steelmaking, but it remains unclear whether it can be economically competitive with other low-emission alternatives. This study develops a static mass and energy flow model of three plasma-based steelmaking processes, and investigates the performance required to be economically competitive with the more established hydrogen direct reduction – electric arc furnace (HDR-EAF) pathway. The technoeconomic analysis in this paper finds that in some scenarios, plasma processes are cheaper than HDR-EAF steelmaking when using medium-grade ore (59 wt% Fe), primarily due to lower capex and flux requirements. A novel two-stage plasma-BOF pathway achieves the lowest levelised cost of steel in most scenarios. However, when using high-grade ore (65 wt% Fe), HDR-EAF steelmaking achieves a levelised cost of 667 USD/tLS, which is cheaper than single-stage plasma steelmaking at 677 USD/tLS. This finding is sensitive to several assumptions, particularly the plasma smelter efficiency. A minimum plasma-smelter thermal efficiency of 82% is required for cost parity with HDR-EAF steelmaking for medium-grade ore. Partial prereduction of the ore to wüstite via direct reduction provides cost savings when plasma-smelter efficiency is low.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144896","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydrogen thermal plasma has been identified as a possible breakthrough pathway for low-CO2-emission steelmaking, but it remains unclear whether it can be economically competitive with other low-emission alternatives. This study develops a static mass and energy flow model of three plasma-based steelmaking processes, and investigates the performance required to be economically competitive with the more established hydrogen direct reduction – electric arc furnace (HDR-EAF) pathway. The technoeconomic analysis in this paper finds that in some scenarios, plasma processes are cheaper than HDR-EAF steelmaking when using medium-grade ore (59 wt% Fe), primarily due to lower capex and flux requirements. A novel two-stage plasma-BOF pathway achieves the lowest levelised cost of steel in most scenarios. However, when using high-grade ore (65 wt% Fe), HDR-EAF steelmaking achieves a levelised cost of 667 USD/tLS, which is cheaper than single-stage plasma steelmaking at 677 USD/tLS. This finding is sensitive to several assumptions, particularly the plasma smelter efficiency. A minimum plasma-smelter thermal efficiency of 82% is required for cost parity with HDR-EAF steelmaking for medium-grade ore. Partial prereduction of the ore to wüstite via direct reduction provides cost savings when plasma-smelter efficiency is low.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
期刊最新文献
Technoeconomic analysis of low-emission steelmaking using hydrogen thermal plasma Unveiling the impacts of climate change on the resilience of renewable energy and power systems: Factors, technological advancements, policies, challenges, and solutions Spatial network characteristics and influencing factors of the synergistic effects of pollution reduction and carbon emission reduction in “Zero Waste City” clusters Dynamic Evolution of PM2.5 Removal by Urban Forests During Rapid Urbanization: From Forest Landscape Pattern Dominance to Impervious Surfaces Climate Bond issuance and Enterprise EESM Competitiveness: Steps toward Environmental and Climate-Responsible development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1