Crash testing machine learning force fields for molecules, materials, and interfaces: molecular dynamics in the TEA challenge 2023†

IF 7.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Chemical Science Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1039/D4SC06530A
Igor Poltavsky, Mirela Puleva, Anton Charkin-Gorbulin, Grégory Fonseca, Ilyes Batatia, Nicholas J. Browning, Stefan Chmiela, Mengnan Cui, J. Thorben Frank, Stefan Heinen, Bing Huang, Silvan Käser, Adil Kabylda, Danish Khan, Carolin Müller, Alastair J. A. Price, Kai Riedmiller, Kai Töpfer, Tsz Wai Ko, Markus Meuwly, Matthias Rupp, Gábor Csányi, O. Anatole von Lilienfeld, Johannes T. Margraf, Klaus-Robert Müller and Alexandre Tkatchenko
{"title":"Crash testing machine learning force fields for molecules, materials, and interfaces: molecular dynamics in the TEA challenge 2023†","authors":"Igor Poltavsky, Mirela Puleva, Anton Charkin-Gorbulin, Grégory Fonseca, Ilyes Batatia, Nicholas J. Browning, Stefan Chmiela, Mengnan Cui, J. Thorben Frank, Stefan Heinen, Bing Huang, Silvan Käser, Adil Kabylda, Danish Khan, Carolin Müller, Alastair J. A. Price, Kai Riedmiller, Kai Töpfer, Tsz Wai Ko, Markus Meuwly, Matthias Rupp, Gábor Csányi, O. Anatole von Lilienfeld, Johannes T. Margraf, Klaus-Robert Müller and Alexandre Tkatchenko","doi":"10.1039/D4SC06530A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >We present the second part of the rigorous evaluation of modern machine learning force fields (MLFFs) within the TEA Challenge 2023. This study provides an in-depth analysis of the performance of MACE, SO3krates, sGDML, SOAP/GAP, and FCHL19* in modeling molecules, molecule-surface interfaces, and periodic materials. We compare observables obtained from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using different MLFFs under identical conditions. Where applicable, density-functional theory (DFT) or experiment serves as a reference to reliably assess the performance of the ML models. In the absence of DFT benchmarks, we conduct a comparative analysis based on results from various MLFF architectures. Our findings indicate that, at the current stage of MLFF development, the choice of ML model is in the hands of the practitioner. When a problem falls within the scope of a given MLFF architecture, the resulting simulations exhibit weak dependency on the specific architecture used. Instead, emphasis should be placed on developing complete, reliable, and representative training datasets. Nonetheless, long-range noncovalent interactions remain challenging for all MLFF models, necessitating special caution in simulations of physical systems where such interactions are prominent, such as molecule-surface interfaces. The findings presented here reflect the state of MLFF models as of October 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":9909,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Science","volume":" 8","pages":" 3738-3754"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/sc/d4sc06530a?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Science","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/sc/d4sc06530a","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present the second part of the rigorous evaluation of modern machine learning force fields (MLFFs) within the TEA Challenge 2023. This study provides an in-depth analysis of the performance of MACE, SO3krates, sGDML, SOAP/GAP, and FCHL19* in modeling molecules, molecule-surface interfaces, and periodic materials. We compare observables obtained from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using different MLFFs under identical conditions. Where applicable, density-functional theory (DFT) or experiment serves as a reference to reliably assess the performance of the ML models. In the absence of DFT benchmarks, we conduct a comparative analysis based on results from various MLFF architectures. Our findings indicate that, at the current stage of MLFF development, the choice of ML model is in the hands of the practitioner. When a problem falls within the scope of a given MLFF architecture, the resulting simulations exhibit weak dependency on the specific architecture used. Instead, emphasis should be placed on developing complete, reliable, and representative training datasets. Nonetheless, long-range noncovalent interactions remain challenging for all MLFF models, necessitating special caution in simulations of physical systems where such interactions are prominent, such as molecule-surface interfaces. The findings presented here reflect the state of MLFF models as of October 2023.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分子、材料和界面的机器学习力场碰撞测试:2023 年 TEA 挑战中的分子动力学
我们在TEA挑战2023中提出了对现代机器学习力场(MLFFs)的严格评估的第二部分。本研究深入分析了MACE、SO3krates、sGDML、SOAP/GAP和FCHL19*在分子、分子-表面界面和周期性材料建模方面的性能。我们比较了在相同条件下使用不同MLFFs进行分子动力学(MD)模拟得到的观测结果。在适用的情况下,密度泛函理论(DFT)或实验可作为可靠评估ML模型性能的参考。在没有DFT基准的情况下,我们基于各种MLFF架构的结果进行了比较分析。我们的研究结果表明,在MLFF发展的当前阶段,ML模型的选择掌握在从业者手中。当问题落在给定MLFF体系结构的范围内时,结果模拟对所使用的特定体系结构表现出较弱的依赖性。相反,重点应该放在开发完整、可靠和具有代表性的训练数据集上。尽管如此,对于所有MLFF模型来说,远程非共价相互作用仍然具有挑战性,在模拟这种相互作用突出的物理系统(如分子-表面界面)时需要特别小心。本文的研究结果反映了截至2023年10月MLFF模型的状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Science
Chemical Science CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1352
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Science is a journal that encompasses various disciplines within the chemical sciences. Its scope includes publishing ground-breaking research with significant implications for its respective field, as well as appealing to a wider audience in related areas. To be considered for publication, articles must showcase innovative and original advances in their field of study and be presented in a manner that is understandable to scientists from diverse backgrounds. However, the journal generally does not publish highly specialized research.
期刊最新文献
A reflection on synthesis by extrusion ten years on: achievements, challenges and opportunities for solvent-free, sustainable, continuous chemical manufacturing. Rationally designed tetrahedral-configuration-matching methane trap in a metal-organic framework for efficient CH4/N2 separation. Band-bending engineering in Cu2ZnSnS4 photocathodes using a composite (Zn,Ti)O electron transport layer for solar water splitting Promoting effect of nickel-chromium hydroxide on nickel phosphide nanosheets for efficient hydrogen production coupled with sulfion degradation Symmetry-Directed Complex Tessellation of Irregular Polygons from a Single Molecular Precursor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1