Evaluating cryogenic grinding variables to maximize valuable metal liberation from spent lithium-ion batteries

IF 5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Minerals Engineering Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109193
F. Mulet-Mery, Jorge Uribe, J. Valenzuela-Elgueta, Cristian Serrano
{"title":"Evaluating cryogenic grinding variables to maximize valuable metal liberation from spent lithium-ion batteries","authors":"F. Mulet-Mery,&nbsp;Jorge Uribe,&nbsp;J. Valenzuela-Elgueta,&nbsp;Cristian Serrano","doi":"10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the liberation of valuable metals from spent Lithium Ion Batteries (LIBs) following cryogenic grinding with varying grinding times, frequencies, and particle sizes. We characterize the physicochemical changes in lithium metal oxide particles focusing on the mineral phases, semi-quantification, and liberation of Co, Ni, and Mn. A total of 18 cathodic material samples underwent cryogenic grinding. Additionally, one sample was processed through conventional grinding for comparison. Grinding variables included frequencies of 10, 20, and 30 Hz, and durations of 3, 5, and 7 min. Subsequently, all tests were analyzed to determine their D<sub>80</sub> value. The response surface methodology was used to ascertain the frequency and time variables with the greatest influence on D<sub>80</sub> values. A predictive regression model was then applied to find the best D<sub>80</sub> value. This statistical analysis was also used to choose the samples for X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electronic Microscope − Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and Quantitative Evaluation of Minerals by Scanning Electron Microscopy (QEMSCAN) characterization. Characterization results revealed that LiCoO<sub>2</sub> and Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> particles have distinct spatial distributions compared to (Li<sub>0.65</sub>Ni<sub>0.05</sub>)(NiO<sub>2</sub>) and Li<sub>1.27</sub>Mn<sub>1.73</sub>O<sub>4</sub> particles, which exhibited similar spatial distributions. LiCoO<sub>2</sub> and Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> particles achieved a high degree of liberation at 20 and 30 Hz frequencies and were liberated even at coarser particle size distributions of approximately &lt; 450 μm when the frequency was equal to 10 Hz. In contrast, (Li<sub>0.65</sub>Ni<sub>0.05</sub>)(NiO<sub>2</sub>) and Li<sub>1.27</sub>Mn<sub>1.73</sub>O<sub>4</sub> particles demonstrated a much lower degree of liberation tending to aggregate and be locked, but they were liberated at &lt; 38 μm size distributions at all frequencies analyzed. Results show that cryogenic grinding is superior to the traditional grinding method. Furthermore, the specific results of the predictive regression model indicate the optimal D<sub>80</sub> value of 55.82 μm can be achieved with a grinding frequency of 39 Hz and 7 min of constant grinding, enhancing the overall recovery efficiency for all target metals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18594,"journal":{"name":"Minerals Engineering","volume":"223 ","pages":"Article 109193"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerals Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0892687525000214","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the liberation of valuable metals from spent Lithium Ion Batteries (LIBs) following cryogenic grinding with varying grinding times, frequencies, and particle sizes. We characterize the physicochemical changes in lithium metal oxide particles focusing on the mineral phases, semi-quantification, and liberation of Co, Ni, and Mn. A total of 18 cathodic material samples underwent cryogenic grinding. Additionally, one sample was processed through conventional grinding for comparison. Grinding variables included frequencies of 10, 20, and 30 Hz, and durations of 3, 5, and 7 min. Subsequently, all tests were analyzed to determine their D80 value. The response surface methodology was used to ascertain the frequency and time variables with the greatest influence on D80 values. A predictive regression model was then applied to find the best D80 value. This statistical analysis was also used to choose the samples for X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electronic Microscope − Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and Quantitative Evaluation of Minerals by Scanning Electron Microscopy (QEMSCAN) characterization. Characterization results revealed that LiCoO2 and Co3O4 particles have distinct spatial distributions compared to (Li0.65Ni0.05)(NiO2) and Li1.27Mn1.73O4 particles, which exhibited similar spatial distributions. LiCoO2 and Co3O4 particles achieved a high degree of liberation at 20 and 30 Hz frequencies and were liberated even at coarser particle size distributions of approximately < 450 μm when the frequency was equal to 10 Hz. In contrast, (Li0.65Ni0.05)(NiO2) and Li1.27Mn1.73O4 particles demonstrated a much lower degree of liberation tending to aggregate and be locked, but they were liberated at < 38 μm size distributions at all frequencies analyzed. Results show that cryogenic grinding is superior to the traditional grinding method. Furthermore, the specific results of the predictive regression model indicate the optimal D80 value of 55.82 μm can be achieved with a grinding frequency of 39 Hz and 7 min of constant grinding, enhancing the overall recovery efficiency for all target metals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估低温磨削变量,最大限度地从废锂离子电池中释放有价值的金属
本研究探讨了在不同的磨削时间、频率和粒度下,从废锂离子电池(LIBs)中释放有价金属的方法。我们描述了锂金属氧化物颗粒的物理化学变化,重点是矿物相,半定量和Co, Ni和Mn的释放。对18个阴极材料样品进行了低温磨削。另外,对其中一个样品进行常规研磨处理进行对比。研磨变量包括频率为10、20和30 Hz,持续时间为3、5和7分钟。随后,对所有测试进行分析以确定其D80值。采用响应面法确定对D80值影响最大的频率和时间变量。然后应用预测回归模型寻找最佳的D80值。通过统计分析选择样品进行x射线衍射(XRD)、扫描电子显微镜-能量色散光谱(SEM-EDS)和扫描电子显微镜矿物定量评价(QEMSCAN)表征。表征结果表明,与(Li0.65Ni0.05)(NiO2)和Li1.27Mn1.73O4粒子的空间分布相似,LiCoO2和Co3O4粒子具有不同的空间分布。LiCoO2和Co3O4颗粒在20和30 Hz频率下获得了高度的释放,即使在约为<的较粗粒度分布下也能被释放。当频率为10hz时,为450 μm。相比之下,(Li0.65Ni0.05)(NiO2)和Li1.27Mn1.73O4粒子的释放程度要低得多,趋向于聚集和锁定,但在<时被释放;分析了各频率下38 μm尺寸的分布。结果表明,低温磨削优于传统磨削方法。预测回归模型的具体结果表明,当磨削频率为39 Hz、连续磨削时间为7 min时,最佳的D80值为55.82 μm,提高了所有目标金属的综合回收率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerals Engineering
Minerals Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
18.80%
发文量
519
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal is to provide for the rapid publication of topical papers featuring the latest developments in the allied fields of mineral processing and extractive metallurgy. Its wide ranging coverage of research and practical (operating) topics includes physical separation methods, such as comminution, flotation concentration and dewatering, chemical methods such as bio-, hydro-, and electro-metallurgy, analytical techniques, process control, simulation and instrumentation, and mineralogical aspects of processing. Environmental issues, particularly those pertaining to sustainable development, will also be strongly covered.
期刊最新文献
Mapping magnesites: carbon mineralization processes yield MgCO3 with highly variable morphology and thermodynamic stabilities Mechanism study on the flotation separation of barite from calcite using sodium N-lauroylsarcosine as a novel collector in an acidified sodium silicate system Enhancing the selective grinding performance of hematite and quartz by hydrogen-based mineral phase transformation: Grinding kinetics, nanoindentation, and DFT calculations Valorization of iron ore tailings for high-grade silica sand production through roasting pretreatment followed by magnetic separation and acid leaching Advances in pyrite depressants for Low-Alkalinity flotation Systems: Mechanisms, Strategies, and future directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1