Mediating or moderating? Innovative approach to the role of flexibility in the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth under different market conditions
{"title":"Mediating or moderating? Innovative approach to the role of flexibility in the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth under different market conditions","authors":"Marcin Suder , Rafał Kusa , Joanna Duda , Małgorzata Okręglicka","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aims to identify the roles played by firm flexibility (FLEX) in the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and firm growth (FG) under different market conditions. In particular, it tests the mediating and moderating roles of FLEX, along with the moderating role of market conditions regarding FLEX. This is a longitudinal study that examines entrepreneurial behaviors during the pandemic crisis and afterwards. The sample represents small companies operating in the printing industry in Poland (150 surveyed during the crisis, and 145 afterward). The study uses structural equitation modeling. The results confirm the positive impact of EO on FG and show the positive impact of EO on FLEX regardless of market conditions. The role of FLEX varies along with changes in market conditions. Specifically, FLEX impacts FG and mediates the EO→FG relationship in a stable market, whereas it does not impact FG nor mediate the EO→FG relationship in a hostile market. Concurrently, FLEX moderates the EO→FG relationship in a hostile environment yet does not in a stable market. The significance of the differences in the strengths of the considered effects (moderation or mediation during the individual periods) are confirmed with a statistical test. This observation unveils that market conditions moderate the role of FLEX regarding the EO→FG relationship. With its findings, this study contributes to the literature on entrepreneurship and small and medium enterprises as well as FG.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 2","pages":"Article 100658"},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25000095","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aims to identify the roles played by firm flexibility (FLEX) in the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation (EO) and firm growth (FG) under different market conditions. In particular, it tests the mediating and moderating roles of FLEX, along with the moderating role of market conditions regarding FLEX. This is a longitudinal study that examines entrepreneurial behaviors during the pandemic crisis and afterwards. The sample represents small companies operating in the printing industry in Poland (150 surveyed during the crisis, and 145 afterward). The study uses structural equitation modeling. The results confirm the positive impact of EO on FG and show the positive impact of EO on FLEX regardless of market conditions. The role of FLEX varies along with changes in market conditions. Specifically, FLEX impacts FG and mediates the EO→FG relationship in a stable market, whereas it does not impact FG nor mediate the EO→FG relationship in a hostile market. Concurrently, FLEX moderates the EO→FG relationship in a hostile environment yet does not in a stable market. The significance of the differences in the strengths of the considered effects (moderation or mediation during the individual periods) are confirmed with a statistical test. This observation unveils that market conditions moderate the role of FLEX regarding the EO→FG relationship. With its findings, this study contributes to the literature on entrepreneurship and small and medium enterprises as well as FG.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices.
JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience.
In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.