VMDI-LSTM-ED: A novel enhanced decomposition ensemble model incorporating data integration for accurate non-stationary daily streamflow forecasting

IF 6.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Hydrology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132769
Jiadong Liu , Teng Xu , Chunhui Lu
{"title":"VMDI-LSTM-ED: A novel enhanced decomposition ensemble model incorporating data integration for accurate non-stationary daily streamflow forecasting","authors":"Jiadong Liu ,&nbsp;Teng Xu ,&nbsp;Chunhui Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate daily streamflow forecasting is crucial for effective flood control and water management. However, the non-stationary nonlinearity in actual streamflow poses a challenge to accurate forecasting. While decomposition ensemble models can address non-stationary nonlinear streamflow, they still suffer from low forecast accuracy when dealing with highly non-stationary streamflow. Recent studies have shown that incorporating lagged streamflow into long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, known as data integration (DI), represents an effective approach for streamflow forecasting. Nevertheless, existing decomposition ensemble models do not fully leverage the benefits of recent observations. To enhance the precision of non-stationary streamflow forecasting, we propose an improved decomposition ensemble model based on DI called VMDI-LSTM-ED, which utilizes recent observations to improve prediction while processing the subsignals of Variational mode decomposition (VMD) decomposition using LSTM with Encoder-Decoder framework (LSTM-ED). In order to evaluate the reliability and applicability of VMDI-LSTM-ED and demonstrate its superiority, we conducted model tests in six different basins in the United States and compared VMDI-LSTM-ED with VMD-LSTM, Transformer, and LSTM-ED. The results indicate that VMDI-LSTM-ED yields the best streamflow forecast result across all tested basins, with an average Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.880 for 1-day ahead forecasts over the six basins; whereas NSE values for VMD-LSTM, Transformer, and LSTM-ED are only 0.687, 0.556, and 0.368 respectively. In addition, VMDI-LSTM-ED is good not only for high-streamflow areas but also for low-streamflow areas, and the prediction effect of peak streamflow is the best.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"653 ","pages":"Article 132769"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425001076","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate daily streamflow forecasting is crucial for effective flood control and water management. However, the non-stationary nonlinearity in actual streamflow poses a challenge to accurate forecasting. While decomposition ensemble models can address non-stationary nonlinear streamflow, they still suffer from low forecast accuracy when dealing with highly non-stationary streamflow. Recent studies have shown that incorporating lagged streamflow into long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, known as data integration (DI), represents an effective approach for streamflow forecasting. Nevertheless, existing decomposition ensemble models do not fully leverage the benefits of recent observations. To enhance the precision of non-stationary streamflow forecasting, we propose an improved decomposition ensemble model based on DI called VMDI-LSTM-ED, which utilizes recent observations to improve prediction while processing the subsignals of Variational mode decomposition (VMD) decomposition using LSTM with Encoder-Decoder framework (LSTM-ED). In order to evaluate the reliability and applicability of VMDI-LSTM-ED and demonstrate its superiority, we conducted model tests in six different basins in the United States and compared VMDI-LSTM-ED with VMD-LSTM, Transformer, and LSTM-ED. The results indicate that VMDI-LSTM-ED yields the best streamflow forecast result across all tested basins, with an average Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) of 0.880 for 1-day ahead forecasts over the six basins; whereas NSE values for VMD-LSTM, Transformer, and LSTM-ED are only 0.687, 0.556, and 0.368 respectively. In addition, VMDI-LSTM-ED is good not only for high-streamflow areas but also for low-streamflow areas, and the prediction effect of peak streamflow is the best.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
VMDI-LSTM-ED:一种基于数据集成的新型增强分解集成模型,用于非平稳日流量的精确预报
准确的日流量预报对有效的防洪和水资源管理至关重要。然而,实际水流的非平稳非线性给准确预报带来了挑战。分解集合模型虽然可以处理非平稳非线性流场,但在处理高度非平稳流场时,预测精度较低。最近的研究表明,将滞后的水流纳入长短期记忆(LSTM)网络,即数据集成(DI),是一种有效的水流预测方法。然而,现有的分解集合模型并没有充分利用最近观测的好处。为了提高非平稳流预报的精度,本文提出了一种改进的基于DI的分解集成模型VMDI-LSTM-ED,该模型在利用变分模态分解(VMD)分解的子信号处理的同时,利用最新观测数据提高预报精度,该模型采用编码器-解码器框架(LSTM- ed)。为了评估VMDI-LSTM-ED的可靠性和适用性,证明其优越性,我们在美国6个不同的盆地进行了模型试验,并将VMDI-LSTM-ED与VMD-LSTM、Transformer和LSTM-ED进行了比较。结果表明,VMDI-LSTM-ED在所有测试流域的流量预测效果最好,6个流域1天前预测的平均纳什-苏特克利夫效率(NSE)为0.880;而VMD-LSTM、Transformer和LSTM-ED的NSE值分别仅为0.687、0.556和0.368。此外,VMDI-LSTM-ED不仅对高流量区有较好的预测效果,对低流量区也有较好的预测效果,其中对峰值流量的预测效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
期刊最新文献
A new approach for groundwater fluxes assessment in alluvial aquifers using active-DTS with a Brillouin-based sensor Daily river water levels from multi-mission altimetry: A reach-based regression method using the unique SWOT data geometry Detection of nine plateau lakes water level changes in Yunnan, China from ICESat-2 data Agent-based intelligent real-time control for pluvial flood mitigation at urban scale A multidimensional Tucker tensor fusion method for multi-satellite derived chlorophyll-a concentrations in an Early Eutrophic Plateau lake
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1