Predictive value of enhanced CT and pathological indicators in lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer based on GEE model.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING BMC Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1186/s12880-025-01577-5
Ling Yang, Yingying Ding, Dafu Zhang, Guangjun Yang, Xingxiang Dong, Zhiping Zhang, Caixia Zhang, Wenjie Zhang, Youguo Dai, Zhenhui Li
{"title":"Predictive value of enhanced CT and pathological indicators in lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer based on GEE model.","authors":"Ling Yang, Yingying Ding, Dafu Zhang, Guangjun Yang, Xingxiang Dong, Zhiping Zhang, Caixia Zhang, Wenjie Zhang, Youguo Dai, Zhenhui Li","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01577-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A predictive model was developed based on enhanced computed tomography (CT), laboratory test results, and pathological indicators to achieve the convenient and effective prediction of single lymph node metastasis (LNM) in gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six consecutive patients (235 regional lymph nodes) with pathologically confirmed gastric cancer who underwent surgery at our hospital between December 2020 and November 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. They were randomly allocated to training (n = 38, number of lymph nodes = 119) and validation (n = 28, number of lymph nodes = 116) datasets. The clinical data, laboratory test results, enhanced CT characteristics, and pathological indicators from gastroscopy-guided needle biopsies were obtained. Multivariable logistic regression with generalised estimation equations (GEEs) was used to develop a predictive model for LNM in gastric cancer. The predictive performance of the model developed using the training and validation datasets was validated using receiver operating characteristic curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lymph node enhancement pattern, Ki67 level, and lymph node long-axis diameter were independent predictors of LNM in gastric cancer (p < 0.01). The GEE-logistic model was associated with LNM (p = 0.001). The area under the curve and accuracy of the model, with 95% confidence intervals, were 0.944 (0.890-0.998) and 0.897 (0.813-0.952), respectively, in the training dataset and 0.836 (0.751-0.921) and 0.798 (0.699-0.876), respectively, in the validation dataset.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The predictive model constructed based on lymph node enhancement pattern, Ki67 level, and lymph node long-axis diameter exhibited good performance in predicting LNM in gastric cancer and should aid the lymph node staging of gastric cancer and clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01577-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: A predictive model was developed based on enhanced computed tomography (CT), laboratory test results, and pathological indicators to achieve the convenient and effective prediction of single lymph node metastasis (LNM) in gastric cancer.

Methods: Sixty-six consecutive patients (235 regional lymph nodes) with pathologically confirmed gastric cancer who underwent surgery at our hospital between December 2020 and November 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. They were randomly allocated to training (n = 38, number of lymph nodes = 119) and validation (n = 28, number of lymph nodes = 116) datasets. The clinical data, laboratory test results, enhanced CT characteristics, and pathological indicators from gastroscopy-guided needle biopsies were obtained. Multivariable logistic regression with generalised estimation equations (GEEs) was used to develop a predictive model for LNM in gastric cancer. The predictive performance of the model developed using the training and validation datasets was validated using receiver operating characteristic curves.

Results: Lymph node enhancement pattern, Ki67 level, and lymph node long-axis diameter were independent predictors of LNM in gastric cancer (p < 0.01). The GEE-logistic model was associated with LNM (p = 0.001). The area under the curve and accuracy of the model, with 95% confidence intervals, were 0.944 (0.890-0.998) and 0.897 (0.813-0.952), respectively, in the training dataset and 0.836 (0.751-0.921) and 0.798 (0.699-0.876), respectively, in the validation dataset.

Conclusion: The predictive model constructed based on lymph node enhancement pattern, Ki67 level, and lymph node long-axis diameter exhibited good performance in predicting LNM in gastric cancer and should aid the lymph node staging of gastric cancer and clinical decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
期刊最新文献
Predictive value of enhanced CT and pathological indicators in lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer based on GEE model. Comparative analysis of the DCNN and HFCNN Based Computerized detection of liver cancer. Hyperspectral imaging in living and deceased donor kidney transplantation. Retrospective MRI analysis of 418 adult shoulder joints to assess the physiological morphology of the glenoid in a low-grade osteoarthritic population. Staging of esophageal cancer using PET/MRI: a systematic review with head-to-head comparison.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1