Anorectal prolapse after anorectal reconstruction: Incidence and risk factors according to the ARM-Net Consortium

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Colorectal Disease Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1111/codi.70010
Pernilla Stenström, Francesca Maestri, Dalia Aminoff, Ivo de Blaauw, Johanna Ludwiczek, Paola Midrio, Alessio Pini Prato, Alejandra Vilanova-Sanchez, Anna Morandi, Iris van Rooij, The ARM-Net Consortium
{"title":"Anorectal prolapse after anorectal reconstruction: Incidence and risk factors according to the ARM-Net Consortium","authors":"Pernilla Stenström,&nbsp;Francesca Maestri,&nbsp;Dalia Aminoff,&nbsp;Ivo de Blaauw,&nbsp;Johanna Ludwiczek,&nbsp;Paola Midrio,&nbsp;Alessio Pini Prato,&nbsp;Alejandra Vilanova-Sanchez,&nbsp;Anna Morandi,&nbsp;Iris van Rooij,&nbsp;The ARM-Net Consortium","doi":"10.1111/codi.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>There is a knowledge gap regarding which patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs) are at highest risk of anorectal prolapse (AP), and which risk factors predispose to AP in ARM. The aims of the study were to define the frequency of AP after ARM reconstruction, and explore risk factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Data from the ARM-Net registry inserted between 2007 and 2023 were used. Inclusion criteria were the reconstruction performed, no stoma at 1-year follow-up and all data available at 1-year follow-up. The statistics used were univariable and multivariable logistic regression models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After exclusions the incidence of AP was 163 in 1117 patients (14.6%) in data inserted by 31 centres from 12 countries. The AP incidence was unevenly distributed between the centres (interquartile range 6.3%–21.7%). AP was more frequent in boys than girls (20.9% vs. 8.1%; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). In both sexes the incidence of AP was higher in complex ARM subtypes (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). AP was most frequent after laparotomy- and laparoscopic-assisted reconstructions (50.0% and 37.5%, respectively). Spinal and sacral anomalies constituted risk factors for AP in univariable analyses, while tethered cord did not. Adjusted risk factors for AP were severity of ARM subtype (40% in long-channel cloaca and bladder neck fistula, OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.0–10.2), laparotomy-assisted posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (50%, OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.6–8.4) and larger neo-anus at 1-year follow-up (Hegar 13.6 vs. 13.1; OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1–1.4). Constipation was not a risk factor for AP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Anorectal prolapse is a frequent postoperative sequela. Adjusted analyses indicate that severity of ARM, abdominal open access during reconstruction and larger size of anus are risk factors.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10512,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Disease","volume":"27 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/codi.70010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/codi.70010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

There is a knowledge gap regarding which patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs) are at highest risk of anorectal prolapse (AP), and which risk factors predispose to AP in ARM. The aims of the study were to define the frequency of AP after ARM reconstruction, and explore risk factors.

Method

Data from the ARM-Net registry inserted between 2007 and 2023 were used. Inclusion criteria were the reconstruction performed, no stoma at 1-year follow-up and all data available at 1-year follow-up. The statistics used were univariable and multivariable logistic regression models.

Results

After exclusions the incidence of AP was 163 in 1117 patients (14.6%) in data inserted by 31 centres from 12 countries. The AP incidence was unevenly distributed between the centres (interquartile range 6.3%–21.7%). AP was more frequent in boys than girls (20.9% vs. 8.1%; P < 0.001). In both sexes the incidence of AP was higher in complex ARM subtypes (P < 0.001). AP was most frequent after laparotomy- and laparoscopic-assisted reconstructions (50.0% and 37.5%, respectively). Spinal and sacral anomalies constituted risk factors for AP in univariable analyses, while tethered cord did not. Adjusted risk factors for AP were severity of ARM subtype (40% in long-channel cloaca and bladder neck fistula, OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.0–10.2), laparotomy-assisted posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (50%, OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.6–8.4) and larger neo-anus at 1-year follow-up (Hegar 13.6 vs. 13.1; OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1–1.4). Constipation was not a risk factor for AP.

Conclusion

Anorectal prolapse is a frequent postoperative sequela. Adjusted analyses indicate that severity of ARM, abdominal open access during reconstruction and larger size of anus are risk factors.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据ARM-Net联盟,肛肠重建后肛肠脱垂的发生率和危险因素。
目的:关于哪些肛肠畸形(ARMs)患者发生肛肠脱垂(AP)的风险最高,以及哪些危险因素易导致肛肠脱垂(AP),目前还存在知识空白。本研究的目的是确定ARM重建后AP发生的频率,并探讨其危险因素。方法:使用2007年至2023年间插入的ARM-Net注册表数据。纳入标准为重建、随访1年无造口、随访1年所有资料。统计使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型。结果:在来自12个国家的31个中心插入的数据中,排除后的AP发生率为1117例患者中的163例(14.6%)。AP发病率在中心间分布不均匀(四分位数间为6.3%-21.7%)。AP在男孩中比女孩更常见(20.9%比8.1%;结论:肛肠脱垂是术后常见的并发症。调整后的分析表明,ARM的严重程度、重建时腹部开放通路和肛门较大是危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Colorectal Disease
Colorectal Disease 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
406
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Diseases of the colon and rectum are common and offer a number of exciting challenges. Clinical, diagnostic and basic science research is expanding rapidly. There is increasing demand from purchasers of health care and patients for clinicians to keep abreast of the latest research and developments, and to translate these into routine practice. Technological advances in diagnosis, surgical technique, new pharmaceuticals, molecular genetics and other basic sciences have transformed many aspects of how these diseases are managed. Such progress will accelerate. Colorectal Disease offers a real benefit to subscribers and authors. It is first and foremost a vehicle for publishing original research relating to the demanding, rapidly expanding field of colorectal diseases. Essential for surgeons, pathologists, oncologists, gastroenterologists and health professionals caring for patients with a disease of the lower GI tract, Colorectal Disease furthers education and inter-professional development by including regular review articles and discussions of current controversies. Note that the journal does not usually accept paediatric surgical papers.
期刊最新文献
Hepatic flexure: The end of the beginning, or the beginning of the end? Why pre-operative localisation remains inconsistent. From healing to utility: Reporting what drives real-world anal fistula care. Fertility and mode of delivery after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: A population-based study. Timing of ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: A survey of the patient perspective in the 'biological' era. Methodological considerations in a radiomics-clinical machine-learning model for predicting cytoreduction completeness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1