Identification of biomarkers for tumor regression grade in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Frontiers in Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fonc.2024.1426592
Zhifu Chen, Yan Wang, Jun Chen, Zijun Xu, Tingjuan Zhang, Lu Sun, Lihua Zhu, Liben Xu, Chaoyang Wu, Zhiyuan Qiu, Dianjun Wang, Ting Wu
{"title":"Identification of biomarkers for tumor regression grade in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.","authors":"Zhifu Chen, Yan Wang, Jun Chen, Zijun Xu, Tingjuan Zhang, Lu Sun, Lihua Zhu, Liben Xu, Chaoyang Wu, Zhiyuan Qiu, Dianjun Wang, Ting Wu","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2024.1426592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Esophageal cancer is a highly invasive malignancy. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy not only increases the rate of complete resection but also improves the median survival. However, a sensitive biomarker is urgently needed in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>60 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) were enrolled at the People's Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University. Patients were grouped according to tumor regression grade (TRG) criteria from the College of American Pathologists (CAP). The correlation between TRG groups, clinicopathologic characteristics, and prognosis was analyzed. Differential gene expression analysis was performed on ESCC patients before and after NCRT using the public database (GSE43519). MMP9, NFIX, and GPR56 were identified as candidate genes, and their expression and correlation with prognosis were evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 60 ESCC patients who underwent surgery after NCRT, the pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 35.0% (21/60), and the major pathological response (MPR) rate was 60.0% (36/60). Poor tumor differentiation and neural or vascular invasion were associated with inadequate tumor regression grade and were independent factors influencing TRG. ESCC patients were divided into effective (TRG 0 + 1) and ineffective (TRG 2 + 3) groups. Higher TRG was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (OS). Our study also identified TRG as an independent prognostic factor through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The differentially expressed genes GPR56, MMP9, and NFIX selected from the GSE43519 dataset were significantly downregulated after NCRT (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed that GPR56 was highly expressed in ESCC, while it was negatively expressed in paracancerous tissues. There was a significant difference in expression between cancerous and paracancerous tissues. GPR56 expression was consistent with the public dataset, and patients with high GPR56 expression had significantly shorter OS (<i>P</i> < 0.05). In addition, patients with inadequate MPR and high GPR56 expression had shorter OS (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that TRG serves as an independent prognostic factor for ESCC following NCRT. High GPR56 expression is found to be associated with a poor prognosis of ESCC. Downregulation of GPR56 suggests a potential significant predictive value in conjunction with MPR analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"14 ","pages":"1426592"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1426592","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Esophageal cancer is a highly invasive malignancy. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy not only increases the rate of complete resection but also improves the median survival. However, a sensitive biomarker is urgently needed in clinical practice.

Methods: 60 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) were enrolled at the People's Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University. Patients were grouped according to tumor regression grade (TRG) criteria from the College of American Pathologists (CAP). The correlation between TRG groups, clinicopathologic characteristics, and prognosis was analyzed. Differential gene expression analysis was performed on ESCC patients before and after NCRT using the public database (GSE43519). MMP9, NFIX, and GPR56 were identified as candidate genes, and their expression and correlation with prognosis were evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis.

Results: Among 60 ESCC patients who underwent surgery after NCRT, the pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 35.0% (21/60), and the major pathological response (MPR) rate was 60.0% (36/60). Poor tumor differentiation and neural or vascular invasion were associated with inadequate tumor regression grade and were independent factors influencing TRG. ESCC patients were divided into effective (TRG 0 + 1) and ineffective (TRG 2 + 3) groups. Higher TRG was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (OS). Our study also identified TRG as an independent prognostic factor through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses (P < 0.05). The differentially expressed genes GPR56, MMP9, and NFIX selected from the GSE43519 dataset were significantly downregulated after NCRT (P < 0.001). Immunohistochemistry showed that GPR56 was highly expressed in ESCC, while it was negatively expressed in paracancerous tissues. There was a significant difference in expression between cancerous and paracancerous tissues. GPR56 expression was consistent with the public dataset, and patients with high GPR56 expression had significantly shorter OS (P < 0.05). In addition, patients with inadequate MPR and high GPR56 expression had shorter OS (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The findings suggest that TRG serves as an independent prognostic factor for ESCC following NCRT. High GPR56 expression is found to be associated with a poor prognosis of ESCC. Downregulation of GPR56 suggests a potential significant predictive value in conjunction with MPR analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers in Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.60%
发文量
6641
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the role of SYNGR4 in breast cancer development: a novel target for immunotherapy. Case report: Short-course hypofractionated radiation therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of advanced ovarian mucinous cystadenocarcinoma. Solitary fibular metastasis from lung adenocarcinoma with gene mutation: a case report. Association between transarterial chemoembolization refractoriness and prognosis in Chinese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a large retrospective cohort study. Burden of esophageal cancer in global, regional and national regions from 1990 to 2021 and its projection until 2050: results from the GBD study 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1