David M DeMarini, William Gwinn, Emily Watkins, Brad Reisfeld, Weihsueh A Chiu, Lauren Zeise, Dinesh Barupal, Parveen Bhatti, Kevin Cross, Eugenia Dogliotti, Jason M Fritz, Dori Germolec, Maria Helena Guerra Andersen, Kathryn Z Guyton, Jennifer Jinot, David H Phillips, Roger R Reddel, Nathaniel Rothman, Martin van den Berg, Roel C H Vermeulen, Paolo Vineis, Amy Wang, Maurice Whelan, Akram Ghantous, Michael Korenjak, Jiri Zavadil, Zdenko Herceg, Sandra Perdomo, Laure Dossus, Shirisha Chittiboyina, Danila Cuomo, John Kaldor, Elisa Pasqual, Gabrielle Rigutto, Roland Wedekind, Caterina Facchin, Fatiha El Ghissassi, Aline de Conti, Mary K Schubauer-Berigan, Federica Madia
{"title":"IARC Workshop on the Key Characteristics of Carcinogens: Assessment of End Points for Evaluating Mechanistic Evidence of Carcinogenic Hazards.","authors":"David M DeMarini, William Gwinn, Emily Watkins, Brad Reisfeld, Weihsueh A Chiu, Lauren Zeise, Dinesh Barupal, Parveen Bhatti, Kevin Cross, Eugenia Dogliotti, Jason M Fritz, Dori Germolec, Maria Helena Guerra Andersen, Kathryn Z Guyton, Jennifer Jinot, David H Phillips, Roger R Reddel, Nathaniel Rothman, Martin van den Berg, Roel C H Vermeulen, Paolo Vineis, Amy Wang, Maurice Whelan, Akram Ghantous, Michael Korenjak, Jiri Zavadil, Zdenko Herceg, Sandra Perdomo, Laure Dossus, Shirisha Chittiboyina, Danila Cuomo, John Kaldor, Elisa Pasqual, Gabrielle Rigutto, Roland Wedekind, Caterina Facchin, Fatiha El Ghissassi, Aline de Conti, Mary K Schubauer-Berigan, Federica Madia","doi":"10.1289/EHP15389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 10 key characteristics (KCs) of carcinogens form the basis of a framework to identify, organize, and evaluate mechanistic evidence relevant to carcinogenic hazard identification. The 10 KCs are related to mechanisms by which carcinogens cause cancer. The <i>International Agency for Research on Cancer</i> (<i>IARC</i>) <i>Monographs</i> programme has successfully applied the KCs framework for the mechanistic evaluation of different types of exposures, including chemicals, metals, and complex exposures, such as environmental, occupational, or dietary exposures. The use of this framework has significantly enhanced the identification and organization of relevant mechanistic data, minimized bias in evaluations, and enriched the knowledge base regarding the mechanisms of known and suspected carcinogens.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to report the main outcomes of an IARC Scientific Workshop convened by the IARC to establish appropriate, transparent, and uniform application of the KCs in future <i>IARC Monographs</i> evaluations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A group of experts from different disciplines reviewed the <i>IARC Monographs</i> experience with the KCs of carcinogens, discussing three main themes: <i>a</i>) the interpretation of end points forming the evidence base for the KCs, <i>b</i>) the incorporation of data from novel assays on the KCs, and <i>c</i>) the integration of the mechanistic evidence as part of cancer hazard identification. The workshop participants assessed the relevance and the informativeness of multiple KCs-associated end points for the evaluation of mechanistic evidence in studies of exposed humans and experimental systems.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Consensus was reached on how to enhance the use of <i>in silico</i>, molecular, and cellular high-output and high-throughput data. In addition, approaches to integrate evidence across the KCs and opportunities to improve methodologies of mechanistic evaluation of cancer hazards were explored. The findings described herein and in a forthcoming IARC technical report will support future working groups of experts in reporting and interpreting results under the KCs framework within the <i>IARC Monographs</i> or in other contexts. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15389.</p>","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":"133 2","pages":"25001"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790013/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15389","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The 10 key characteristics (KCs) of carcinogens form the basis of a framework to identify, organize, and evaluate mechanistic evidence relevant to carcinogenic hazard identification. The 10 KCs are related to mechanisms by which carcinogens cause cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs programme has successfully applied the KCs framework for the mechanistic evaluation of different types of exposures, including chemicals, metals, and complex exposures, such as environmental, occupational, or dietary exposures. The use of this framework has significantly enhanced the identification and organization of relevant mechanistic data, minimized bias in evaluations, and enriched the knowledge base regarding the mechanisms of known and suspected carcinogens.
Objectives: We sought to report the main outcomes of an IARC Scientific Workshop convened by the IARC to establish appropriate, transparent, and uniform application of the KCs in future IARC Monographs evaluations.
Methods: A group of experts from different disciplines reviewed the IARC Monographs experience with the KCs of carcinogens, discussing three main themes: a) the interpretation of end points forming the evidence base for the KCs, b) the incorporation of data from novel assays on the KCs, and c) the integration of the mechanistic evidence as part of cancer hazard identification. The workshop participants assessed the relevance and the informativeness of multiple KCs-associated end points for the evaluation of mechanistic evidence in studies of exposed humans and experimental systems.
Discussion: Consensus was reached on how to enhance the use of in silico, molecular, and cellular high-output and high-throughput data. In addition, approaches to integrate evidence across the KCs and opportunities to improve methodologies of mechanistic evaluation of cancer hazards were explored. The findings described herein and in a forthcoming IARC technical report will support future working groups of experts in reporting and interpreting results under the KCs framework within the IARC Monographs or in other contexts. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15389.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.