IARC Workshop on the Key Characteristics of Carcinogens: Assessment of End Points for Evaluating Mechanistic Evidence of Carcinogenic Hazards.

IF 10.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Health Perspectives Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1289/EHP15389
David M DeMarini, William Gwinn, Emily Watkins, Brad Reisfeld, Weihsueh A Chiu, Lauren Zeise, Dinesh Barupal, Parveen Bhatti, Kevin Cross, Eugenia Dogliotti, Jason M Fritz, Dori Germolec, Maria Helena Guerra Andersen, Kathryn Z Guyton, Jennifer Jinot, David H Phillips, Roger R Reddel, Nathaniel Rothman, Martin van den Berg, Roel C H Vermeulen, Paolo Vineis, Amy Wang, Maurice Whelan, Akram Ghantous, Michael Korenjak, Jiri Zavadil, Zdenko Herceg, Sandra Perdomo, Laure Dossus, Shirisha Chittiboyina, Danila Cuomo, John Kaldor, Elisa Pasqual, Gabrielle Rigutto, Roland Wedekind, Caterina Facchin, Fatiha El Ghissassi, Aline de Conti, Mary K Schubauer-Berigan, Federica Madia
{"title":"IARC Workshop on the Key Characteristics of Carcinogens: Assessment of End Points for Evaluating Mechanistic Evidence of Carcinogenic Hazards.","authors":"David M DeMarini, William Gwinn, Emily Watkins, Brad Reisfeld, Weihsueh A Chiu, Lauren Zeise, Dinesh Barupal, Parveen Bhatti, Kevin Cross, Eugenia Dogliotti, Jason M Fritz, Dori Germolec, Maria Helena Guerra Andersen, Kathryn Z Guyton, Jennifer Jinot, David H Phillips, Roger R Reddel, Nathaniel Rothman, Martin van den Berg, Roel C H Vermeulen, Paolo Vineis, Amy Wang, Maurice Whelan, Akram Ghantous, Michael Korenjak, Jiri Zavadil, Zdenko Herceg, Sandra Perdomo, Laure Dossus, Shirisha Chittiboyina, Danila Cuomo, John Kaldor, Elisa Pasqual, Gabrielle Rigutto, Roland Wedekind, Caterina Facchin, Fatiha El Ghissassi, Aline de Conti, Mary K Schubauer-Berigan, Federica Madia","doi":"10.1289/EHP15389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 10 key characteristics (KCs) of carcinogens form the basis of a framework to identify, organize, and evaluate mechanistic evidence relevant to carcinogenic hazard identification. The 10 KCs are related to mechanisms by which carcinogens cause cancer. The <i>International Agency for Research on Cancer</i> (<i>IARC</i>) <i>Monographs</i> programme has successfully applied the KCs framework for the mechanistic evaluation of different types of exposures, including chemicals, metals, and complex exposures, such as environmental, occupational, or dietary exposures. The use of this framework has significantly enhanced the identification and organization of relevant mechanistic data, minimized bias in evaluations, and enriched the knowledge base regarding the mechanisms of known and suspected carcinogens.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to report the main outcomes of an IARC Scientific Workshop convened by the IARC to establish appropriate, transparent, and uniform application of the KCs in future <i>IARC Monographs</i> evaluations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A group of experts from different disciplines reviewed the <i>IARC Monographs</i> experience with the KCs of carcinogens, discussing three main themes: <i>a</i>) the interpretation of end points forming the evidence base for the KCs, <i>b</i>) the incorporation of data from novel assays on the KCs, and <i>c</i>) the integration of the mechanistic evidence as part of cancer hazard identification. The workshop participants assessed the relevance and the informativeness of multiple KCs-associated end points for the evaluation of mechanistic evidence in studies of exposed humans and experimental systems.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Consensus was reached on how to enhance the use of <i>in silico</i>, molecular, and cellular high-output and high-throughput data. In addition, approaches to integrate evidence across the KCs and opportunities to improve methodologies of mechanistic evaluation of cancer hazards were explored. The findings described herein and in a forthcoming IARC technical report will support future working groups of experts in reporting and interpreting results under the KCs framework within the <i>IARC Monographs</i> or in other contexts. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15389.</p>","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":"133 2","pages":"25001"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790013/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15389","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 10 key characteristics (KCs) of carcinogens form the basis of a framework to identify, organize, and evaluate mechanistic evidence relevant to carcinogenic hazard identification. The 10 KCs are related to mechanisms by which carcinogens cause cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs programme has successfully applied the KCs framework for the mechanistic evaluation of different types of exposures, including chemicals, metals, and complex exposures, such as environmental, occupational, or dietary exposures. The use of this framework has significantly enhanced the identification and organization of relevant mechanistic data, minimized bias in evaluations, and enriched the knowledge base regarding the mechanisms of known and suspected carcinogens.

Objectives: We sought to report the main outcomes of an IARC Scientific Workshop convened by the IARC to establish appropriate, transparent, and uniform application of the KCs in future IARC Monographs evaluations.

Methods: A group of experts from different disciplines reviewed the IARC Monographs experience with the KCs of carcinogens, discussing three main themes: a) the interpretation of end points forming the evidence base for the KCs, b) the incorporation of data from novel assays on the KCs, and c) the integration of the mechanistic evidence as part of cancer hazard identification. The workshop participants assessed the relevance and the informativeness of multiple KCs-associated end points for the evaluation of mechanistic evidence in studies of exposed humans and experimental systems.

Discussion: Consensus was reached on how to enhance the use of in silico, molecular, and cellular high-output and high-throughput data. In addition, approaches to integrate evidence across the KCs and opportunities to improve methodologies of mechanistic evaluation of cancer hazards were explored. The findings described herein and in a forthcoming IARC technical report will support future working groups of experts in reporting and interpreting results under the KCs framework within the IARC Monographs or in other contexts. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP15389.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Health Perspectives
Environmental Health Perspectives 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
388
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.
期刊最新文献
Comment on "Occupational Benzene Exposure and Lung Cancer in Human Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". Response to "Comment on 'Occupational Benzene Exposure and Lung Cancer in Human Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'". Comment on "Asking Why Is Necessary to Address Health Disparities: A Critical Approach for Solution-Oriented Environmental Epidemiological Research". Estimating the effects of hypothetical ambient PM2.5 interventions on the risk of dementia using the parametric g-formula in the UK Biobank cohort. Invited Perspective: Prenatal and childhood exposure to fluoride and cognitive development: findings from the longitudinal MINIMat cohort in rural Bangladesh.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1