{"title":"High serum uric acid levels are associated with increased prevalence of gallstones in adult women: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES.","authors":"Guozheng Lv, Decai Wang, Yu Huang, Ruizi Shi, Chuan Qin, Xi Chen, Xintao Zeng, Hua Luo, Pei Yang, Sirui Chen, Jianjun Wang","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1487974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated the association between serum uric acid (SUA) levels and gallstone (GS) prevalence in adult women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants' information were taken from the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2017-2020). Logistic regression analysis and dose-response curve were used to assess the association between SUA levels and the prevalence of GS in adult women. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate associations between SUA levels and age, ethnicity, body mass index, hypertension, and diabetes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 600 participants self-reported a history of GS. After adjusting for confounding, the prevalence of GS in adult women increased by 14% for every 1 mg/dL increase in SUA (odds ratio [OR]: 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06, 1.22). Testing SUA as a categorical variable for sensitivity analyses indicated a 1.6-fold increase in the prevalence of GS in tertile 3 (OR=1.60, 95% CI: 1.25, 2.04) compared to tertile 1. Dose-response curves showed a nonlinear correlation between SUA levels and the prevalence of GS. Subgroup analyses indicated that SUA level was associated with an increased prevalence of GS in most subgroups, although subtle differences existed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SUA was positively and non-linearly associated with the prevalence of GS in adult females. Despite the inability to clarify the causal relationship between them, our results remain interesting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1487974"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1487974","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: We investigated the association between serum uric acid (SUA) levels and gallstone (GS) prevalence in adult women.
Methods: Participants' information were taken from the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2017-2020). Logistic regression analysis and dose-response curve were used to assess the association between SUA levels and the prevalence of GS in adult women. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate associations between SUA levels and age, ethnicity, body mass index, hypertension, and diabetes.
Results: A total of 600 participants self-reported a history of GS. After adjusting for confounding, the prevalence of GS in adult women increased by 14% for every 1 mg/dL increase in SUA (odds ratio [OR]: 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06, 1.22). Testing SUA as a categorical variable for sensitivity analyses indicated a 1.6-fold increase in the prevalence of GS in tertile 3 (OR=1.60, 95% CI: 1.25, 2.04) compared to tertile 1. Dose-response curves showed a nonlinear correlation between SUA levels and the prevalence of GS. Subgroup analyses indicated that SUA level was associated with an increased prevalence of GS in most subgroups, although subtle differences existed.
Conclusion: SUA was positively and non-linearly associated with the prevalence of GS in adult females. Despite the inability to clarify the causal relationship between them, our results remain interesting.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate
- the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions
- the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines
- the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities
- access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide
- addressing the grand health challenges around the world