A telehealth approach to central line-associated bloodstream infection prevention activities in nursing homes: the SAFER lines program.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1017/ice.2024.203
Raveena D Singh, Bardia Bahadori, Tom Tjoa, Mohamad N Alsharif, Shereen Nourollahi, Justin Chang, Amarah Mauricio, Jessica Bethlahmy, Syma Rashid, Raheeb Saavedra, Isabel Y Ashbaugh, Steven Tam, Shruti K Gohil
{"title":"A telehealth approach to central line-associated bloodstream infection prevention activities in nursing homes: the SAFER lines program.","authors":"Raveena D Singh, Bardia Bahadori, Tom Tjoa, Mohamad N Alsharif, Shereen Nourollahi, Justin Chang, Amarah Mauricio, Jessica Bethlahmy, Syma Rashid, Raheeb Saavedra, Isabel Y Ashbaugh, Steven Tam, Shruti K Gohil","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of a mobile-app-based central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention program in nursing home residents with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pre-post prospective cohort study with baseline (September 2015-December 2016), phase-in (January 2017-April 2017), and intervention (May 2017-December 2018). Generalized linear mixed models compared intervention with baseline frequency of localized inflammation/infection, dressing peeling, and infection-related hospitalizations. Cox proportional hazards models compared days-to-removal of lines with localized inflammation/infection.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Six nursing homes in Orange County, California.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult nursing home residents with PICCs.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>CLABSI prevention program consisting of an actionable scoring system for identifying insertion site infection/inflammation coupled with a mobile-app enabling photo-assessments and automated physician alerting for remote response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We completed 8,131 assessments of 817 PICCs in 719 residents (baseline: 4,865 assessments, 422 PICCs, 385 residents; intervention: 4,264 assessments, 395 PICCs, 334 residents). The intervention was associated with 57% lower odds of peeling dressings (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.28-0.64, <i>P</i> < .001), 73% lower local inflammation/infection (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.13-0.56, <i>P</i> < .001), and 41% lower risk of infection-related hospitalizations (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42-0.83, <i>P</i> = .002). Physician mobile-app alerting and response enabled 62% lower risk of lines remaining in place after inflammation/infection was identified (HR 0.38, CI: 0.24-0.62, <i>P</i> < .001) and 95% faster removal of infected lines from mean (SD) 19 (20) to 1 (2) days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A mobile-app-based CLABSI prevention program decreased the frequency of inflamed/infected central line insertion sites, improved dressing integrity, increased speed of removal when inflammation/infection were found, and reduced infection-related hospitalization risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883653/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of a mobile-app-based central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention program in nursing home residents with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs).

Design: Pre-post prospective cohort study with baseline (September 2015-December 2016), phase-in (January 2017-April 2017), and intervention (May 2017-December 2018). Generalized linear mixed models compared intervention with baseline frequency of localized inflammation/infection, dressing peeling, and infection-related hospitalizations. Cox proportional hazards models compared days-to-removal of lines with localized inflammation/infection.

Setting: Six nursing homes in Orange County, California.

Patients: Adult nursing home residents with PICCs.

Intervention: CLABSI prevention program consisting of an actionable scoring system for identifying insertion site infection/inflammation coupled with a mobile-app enabling photo-assessments and automated physician alerting for remote response.

Results: We completed 8,131 assessments of 817 PICCs in 719 residents (baseline: 4,865 assessments, 422 PICCs, 385 residents; intervention: 4,264 assessments, 395 PICCs, 334 residents). The intervention was associated with 57% lower odds of peeling dressings (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.28-0.64, P < .001), 73% lower local inflammation/infection (OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.13-0.56, P < .001), and 41% lower risk of infection-related hospitalizations (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42-0.83, P = .002). Physician mobile-app alerting and response enabled 62% lower risk of lines remaining in place after inflammation/infection was identified (HR 0.38, CI: 0.24-0.62, P < .001) and 95% faster removal of infected lines from mean (SD) 19 (20) to 1 (2) days.

Conclusions: A mobile-app-based CLABSI prevention program decreased the frequency of inflamed/infected central line insertion sites, improved dressing integrity, increased speed of removal when inflammation/infection were found, and reduced infection-related hospitalization risk.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程保健方法的中心线相关血流感染预防活动在养老院:更安全的线路方案。
目的:评估基于移动应用程序的中心线相关血流感染(CLABSI)预防计划对周围插入中心导管(picc)的养老院居民的影响。设计:前后前瞻性队列研究,包括基线研究(2015年9月- 2016年12月)、分期研究(2017年1月- 2017年4月)和干预研究(2017年5月- 2018年12月)。广义线性混合模型比较了干预与局部炎症/感染、敷料剥落和感染相关住院的基线频率。Cox比例风险模型比较了局部炎症/感染系的切除天数。背景:加州奥兰治县的六家养老院。患者:患有picc的成年养老院居民。干预措施:CLABSI预防计划包括一个可操作的评分系统,用于识别插入部位感染/炎症,再加上一个移动应用程序,可以进行照片评估和远程响应的自动医生警报。结果:我们在719名居民中完成了817项picc的8131项评估(基线:4865项评估,422项picc, 385名居民;干预:4,264项评估,395名picc, 334名居民)。干预与57%的剥脱敷料发生率降低(OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.28-0.64, P < 0.001), 73%的局部炎症/感染发生率降低(OR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.13-0.56, P < 0.001), 41%的感染相关住院风险降低(OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42-0.83, P = 0.002)相关。医生的移动应用程序警报和响应使识别出炎症/感染后的细胞株残留风险降低62% (HR 0.38, CI: 0.24-0.62, P < 0.001),并且从平均(SD) 19(20)到1(2)天内将感染细胞株清除的速度提高95%。结论:基于移动应用程序的CLABSI预防程序减少了中心线插入部位发炎/感染的频率,改善了敷料的完整性,增加了发现炎症/感染时的移除速度,并降低了感染相关的住院风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
期刊最新文献
Optimization of vancomycin use in hospitalized patients with pneumonia through implementation of informatics based antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) intervention. Digital misinformation and antimicrobial stewardship: cross-platform epidemiologic signals from a decade of online discourse (2015-2025). Decrease in healthcare-associated infection rates in preterm infants-longitudinal data from 15 years of nationwide surveillance in Germany. Trends, predictors, and association of surgical timing with mortality among patients with Clostridioides difficile infection requiring colectomy: a cohort study. Not everyone is special: evaluation of indication in a urinalysis-driven reflex urine culture protocol at an academic medical center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1