Therapeutic efficacy of immune-oncology combination therapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma without prior nephrectomy.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1007/s10147-025-02710-8
Kosuke Ueda, Naoki Ito, Yuya Sakai, Satoshi Ohnishi, Taishi Hirano, Hirofumi Kurose, Katsuaki Chikui, Keiichiro Uemura, Kiyoaki Nishihara, Makoto Nakiri, Shigetaka Suekane, Tsukasa Igawa
{"title":"Therapeutic efficacy of immune-oncology combination therapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma without prior nephrectomy.","authors":"Kosuke Ueda, Naoki Ito, Yuya Sakai, Satoshi Ohnishi, Taishi Hirano, Hirofumi Kurose, Katsuaki Chikui, Keiichiro Uemura, Kiyoaki Nishihara, Makoto Nakiri, Shigetaka Suekane, Tsukasa Igawa","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02710-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immuno-oncology (IO) combination therapies, including IO + IO or IO + vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapies (VEGF-TT), have become the standard first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the optimal regimen for patients without prior nephrectomy remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 99 patients with advanced RCC without nephrectomy, treated with VEGF-TT, IO + IO, or IO + VEGF-TT between May 2008 and May 2024, were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients were divided into VEGE-TT, IO + IO, and IO + VEGF-TT groups based on their first-line treatment, and survival and tumor response were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients included in this study were categorized as either intermediate or poor risk according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk classification. Among the 99 included patients, 41 initiated first-line therapy with VEGF-TT, 36 with IO + IO, and 22 with IO + VEGF-TT. The objective response rates were 17.5% for VEGF-TT, 38.9% for IO + IO, and 61.9% for IO + VEGF-TT. Notably, the IO + VEGF-TT group showed the greatest shrinkage of target kidney lesions (p = 0.0042). In multivariate analyses, bone metastasis (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.812, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.017-3.228, p = 0.0436) and the first-line regimen (VEGF-TT vs IO + VEGF-TT: HR = 0.129, 95% CI 0.045-0.369, p = 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival. The first-line regimen (VEGF-TT vs IO + VEGF-TT: HR = 0.303, 95% CI 0.104-0.879, p = 0.0279) independently affected overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IO combination therapy, especially IO + VEGF-TT, has demonstrated a higher anti-tumor response in patients with advanced RCC without nephrectomy and may also be highly effective against primary renal tumors. Therefore, further studies are needed to improve patient survival and validate efficacy of IO combination therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"770-779"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02710-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immuno-oncology (IO) combination therapies, including IO + IO or IO + vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapies (VEGF-TT), have become the standard first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the optimal regimen for patients without prior nephrectomy remains unclear.

Methods: Data from 99 patients with advanced RCC without nephrectomy, treated with VEGF-TT, IO + IO, or IO + VEGF-TT between May 2008 and May 2024, were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients were divided into VEGE-TT, IO + IO, and IO + VEGF-TT groups based on their first-line treatment, and survival and tumor response were compared.

Results: All patients included in this study were categorized as either intermediate or poor risk according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk classification. Among the 99 included patients, 41 initiated first-line therapy with VEGF-TT, 36 with IO + IO, and 22 with IO + VEGF-TT. The objective response rates were 17.5% for VEGF-TT, 38.9% for IO + IO, and 61.9% for IO + VEGF-TT. Notably, the IO + VEGF-TT group showed the greatest shrinkage of target kidney lesions (p = 0.0042). In multivariate analyses, bone metastasis (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.812, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.017-3.228, p = 0.0436) and the first-line regimen (VEGF-TT vs IO + VEGF-TT: HR = 0.129, 95% CI 0.045-0.369, p = 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival. The first-line regimen (VEGF-TT vs IO + VEGF-TT: HR = 0.303, 95% CI 0.104-0.879, p = 0.0279) independently affected overall survival.

Conclusion: IO combination therapy, especially IO + VEGF-TT, has demonstrated a higher anti-tumor response in patients with advanced RCC without nephrectomy and may also be highly effective against primary renal tumors. Therefore, further studies are needed to improve patient survival and validate efficacy of IO combination therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免疫肿瘤联合治疗未行肾切除术的晚期肾细胞癌的疗效观察。
背景:免疫肿瘤学(IO)联合治疗,包括IO + IO或IO +血管内皮生长因子靶向治疗(VEGF-TT),已成为晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)的标准一线治疗。然而,对于没有进行过肾切除术的患者,最佳的治疗方案仍不清楚。方法:回顾性分析2008年5月至2024年5月期间99例未行肾切除术的晚期肾癌患者的数据,这些患者接受了VEGF-TT、IO + IO或IO + VEGF-TT治疗。根据一线治疗情况将患者分为VEGF-TT组、IO + IO组和IO + VEGF-TT组,比较患者的生存期和肿瘤反应。结果:根据国际转移性RCC数据库联盟风险分类,本研究中所有患者均被分类为中度或低风险。在纳入的99例患者中,41例接受了VEGF-TT的一线治疗,36例接受了IO + IO治疗,22例接受了IO + VEGF-TT治疗。客观缓解率分别为:VEGF-TT组17.5%,IO + IO组38.9%,IO + VEGF-TT组61.9%。值得注意的是,IO + VEGF-TT组靶肾病变缩小幅度最大(p = 0.0042)。在多因素分析中,骨转移(风险比(HR) = 1.812, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.017-3.228, p = 0.0436)和一线治疗方案(VEGF-TT vs IO + VEGF-TT: HR = 0.129, 95% CI 0.045-0.369, p = 0.0001)是影响无进展生存期的独立预后因素。一线方案(VEGF-TT vs IO + VEGF-TT: HR = 0.303, 95% CI 0.104-0.879, p = 0.0279)独立影响总生存率。结论:IO联合治疗,特别是IO + VEGF-TT,在未行肾切除术的晚期肾癌患者中显示出更高的抗肿瘤反应,对原发性肾肿瘤也可能非常有效。因此,需要进一步的研究来提高患者的生存率并验证IO联合治疗的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
期刊最新文献
A paradigm shift in genetic predisposition to colorectal cancer: the impact of germline multigene panel testing on diagnosis and management. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and triage in oral cancer: a clinician‑centered narrative review. Interleukin-1 receptor type 1 in pancreatic cancer progression and metastasis: a review. Comprehensive circulating tumor DNA mutation profiling via CAPP-Seq liquid biopsy for cervical cancer. Comparative genomic landscape of primary and metastatic bladder urothelial carcinoma in a large-scale cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1