Therapeutic efficacy of immune-oncology combination therapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma without prior nephrectomy.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1007/s10147-025-02710-8
Kosuke Ueda, Naoki Ito, Yuya Sakai, Satoshi Ohnishi, Taishi Hirano, Hirofumi Kurose, Katsuaki Chikui, Keiichiro Uemura, Kiyoaki Nishihara, Makoto Nakiri, Shigetaka Suekane, Tsukasa Igawa
{"title":"Therapeutic efficacy of immune-oncology combination therapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma without prior nephrectomy.","authors":"Kosuke Ueda, Naoki Ito, Yuya Sakai, Satoshi Ohnishi, Taishi Hirano, Hirofumi Kurose, Katsuaki Chikui, Keiichiro Uemura, Kiyoaki Nishihara, Makoto Nakiri, Shigetaka Suekane, Tsukasa Igawa","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02710-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immuno-oncology (IO) combination therapies, including IO + IO or IO + vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapies (VEGF-TT), have become the standard first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the optimal regimen for patients without prior nephrectomy remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 99 patients with advanced RCC without nephrectomy, treated with VEGF-TT, IO + IO, or IO + VEGF-TT between May 2008 and May 2024, were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients were divided into VEGE-TT, IO + IO, and IO + VEGF-TT groups based on their first-line treatment, and survival and tumor response were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients included in this study were categorized as either intermediate or poor risk according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk classification. Among the 99 included patients, 41 initiated first-line therapy with VEGF-TT, 36 with IO + IO, and 22 with IO + VEGF-TT. The objective response rates were 17.5% for VEGF-TT, 38.9% for IO + IO, and 61.9% for IO + VEGF-TT. Notably, the IO + VEGF-TT group showed the greatest shrinkage of target kidney lesions (p = 0.0042). In multivariate analyses, bone metastasis (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.812, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.017-3.228, p = 0.0436) and the first-line regimen (VEGF-TT vs IO + VEGF-TT: HR = 0.129, 95% CI 0.045-0.369, p = 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival. The first-line regimen (VEGF-TT vs IO + VEGF-TT: HR = 0.303, 95% CI 0.104-0.879, p = 0.0279) independently affected overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IO combination therapy, especially IO + VEGF-TT, has demonstrated a higher anti-tumor response in patients with advanced RCC without nephrectomy and may also be highly effective against primary renal tumors. Therefore, further studies are needed to improve patient survival and validate efficacy of IO combination therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02710-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immuno-oncology (IO) combination therapies, including IO + IO or IO + vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapies (VEGF-TT), have become the standard first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the optimal regimen for patients without prior nephrectomy remains unclear.

Methods: Data from 99 patients with advanced RCC without nephrectomy, treated with VEGF-TT, IO + IO, or IO + VEGF-TT between May 2008 and May 2024, were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients were divided into VEGE-TT, IO + IO, and IO + VEGF-TT groups based on their first-line treatment, and survival and tumor response were compared.

Results: All patients included in this study were categorized as either intermediate or poor risk according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk classification. Among the 99 included patients, 41 initiated first-line therapy with VEGF-TT, 36 with IO + IO, and 22 with IO + VEGF-TT. The objective response rates were 17.5% for VEGF-TT, 38.9% for IO + IO, and 61.9% for IO + VEGF-TT. Notably, the IO + VEGF-TT group showed the greatest shrinkage of target kidney lesions (p = 0.0042). In multivariate analyses, bone metastasis (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.812, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.017-3.228, p = 0.0436) and the first-line regimen (VEGF-TT vs IO + VEGF-TT: HR = 0.129, 95% CI 0.045-0.369, p = 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival. The first-line regimen (VEGF-TT vs IO + VEGF-TT: HR = 0.303, 95% CI 0.104-0.879, p = 0.0279) independently affected overall survival.

Conclusion: IO combination therapy, especially IO + VEGF-TT, has demonstrated a higher anti-tumor response in patients with advanced RCC without nephrectomy and may also be highly effective against primary renal tumors. Therefore, further studies are needed to improve patient survival and validate efficacy of IO combination therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
期刊最新文献
Dose-finding and efficacy confirmation trial of the superselective intra-arterial infusion of cisplatin and concomitant radiation therapy for locally advanced maxillary sinus cancer (JCOG1212): final analysis. Surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma in era of multidisciplinary strategies. Five-year outcomes with gefitinib induction and chemoradiotherapy in EGFR-mutant stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: LOGIK0902/OLCSG0905 phase II study. Therapeutic efficacy of immune-oncology combination therapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma without prior nephrectomy. Adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer without EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1