Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17588359251316099
Xiongwen Yang, Yi Xiao, Yubin Zhou, Hao Hu, Huiyin Deng, Jian Huang, Maoli Liang, Zihao Yuan, Longyan Dong, Shaohong Huang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.","authors":"Xiongwen Yang, Yi Xiao, Yubin Zhou, Hao Hu, Huiyin Deng, Jian Huang, Maoli Liang, Zihao Yuan, Longyan Dong, Shaohong Huang","doi":"10.1177/17588359251316099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (pLELC) is a rare subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer that predominantly affects younger, non-smoking individuals in southern and southeast Asia, where Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) prevalence is high. The efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in pLELC, especially in second-line settings, remain inadequately explored.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, in improving progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced pLELC.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a multicenter retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 252 patients with stage IIIB-IV pLELC treated across six centers. Patients received chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or a combination of both (chemoimmunotherapy). The primary outcomes measured were PFS and OS across different treatment regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Chemoimmunotherapy significantly improved both PFS and OS compared to chemotherapy alone, in both first- and second-line settings. In first-line treatment, chemoimmunotherapy resulted in a median PFS of 17.6 months and OS of 26.1 months, compared to chemotherapy alone (PFS 8.7 months, OS 19.2 months). In the second-line setting, chemoimmunotherapy achieved a median PFS of 5.1 months and OS of 13.5 months, surpassing the outcomes with chemotherapy alone (PFS 3.3 months, OS 8.9 months). High baseline EBV-DNA levels (>2000 copies/mL) and low programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (<50%) were associated with poorer outcomes. In addition, patients with high baseline serum tumor markers (STMs) and a dynamic reduction of ⩽20% in STMs exhibited significantly worse PFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study suggests that immunotherapy, particularly when combined with chemotherapy, offers significant survival benefits for patients with advanced pLELC. Baseline EBV-DNA levels, PD-L1 expression, and both baseline and dynamic STM changes serve as important predictors of treatment response, highlighting the need for personalized therapeutic approaches in this unique subtype of lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"17 ","pages":"17588359251316099"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359251316099","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (pLELC) is a rare subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer that predominantly affects younger, non-smoking individuals in southern and southeast Asia, where Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) prevalence is high. The efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in pLELC, especially in second-line settings, remain inadequately explored.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, in improving progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced pLELC.

Design: This was a multicenter retrospective study.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 252 patients with stage IIIB-IV pLELC treated across six centers. Patients received chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or a combination of both (chemoimmunotherapy). The primary outcomes measured were PFS and OS across different treatment regimens.

Results: Chemoimmunotherapy significantly improved both PFS and OS compared to chemotherapy alone, in both first- and second-line settings. In first-line treatment, chemoimmunotherapy resulted in a median PFS of 17.6 months and OS of 26.1 months, compared to chemotherapy alone (PFS 8.7 months, OS 19.2 months). In the second-line setting, chemoimmunotherapy achieved a median PFS of 5.1 months and OS of 13.5 months, surpassing the outcomes with chemotherapy alone (PFS 3.3 months, OS 8.9 months). High baseline EBV-DNA levels (>2000 copies/mL) and low programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (<50%) were associated with poorer outcomes. In addition, patients with high baseline serum tumor markers (STMs) and a dynamic reduction of ⩽20% in STMs exhibited significantly worse PFS and OS.

Conclusion: The study suggests that immunotherapy, particularly when combined with chemotherapy, offers significant survival benefits for patients with advanced pLELC. Baseline EBV-DNA levels, PD-L1 expression, and both baseline and dynamic STM changes serve as important predictors of treatment response, highlighting the need for personalized therapeutic approaches in this unique subtype of lung cancer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免疫治疗局部晚期或转移性肺淋巴上皮瘤样癌的疗效和安全性:一项多中心回顾性研究
背景:肺淋巴上皮瘤样癌(pLELC)是一种罕见的非小细胞肺癌亚型,主要发生在eb病毒(EBV)患病率高的南亚和东南亚的年轻、不吸烟人群中。免疫治疗在pLELC中的有效性和安全性,特别是在二线环境中,仍然没有得到充分的探讨。目的:本研究旨在评估免疫治疗(单独或联合化疗)对改善晚期pLELC患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的疗效。设计:这是一项多中心回顾性研究。方法:对来自6个中心的252例IIIB-IV期pLELC患者进行回顾性分析。患者接受化疗、免疫治疗或两者联合(化学免疫治疗)。测量的主要结果是不同治疗方案的PFS和OS。结果:与单独化疗相比,化疗免疫治疗在一线和二线环境中均显著改善了PFS和OS。在一线治疗中,与单纯化疗(PFS 8.7个月,OS 19.2个月)相比,化疗免疫治疗的中位PFS为17.6个月,OS为26.1个月。在二线治疗中,化疗免疫治疗的中位PFS为5.1个月,OS为13.5个月,超过了单独化疗的结果(PFS为3.3个月,OS为8.9个月)。高基线EBV-DNA水平(bb0 2000拷贝/mL)和低程序性死亡配体1 (PD-L1)表达(结论:研究表明,免疫治疗,特别是联合化疗,为晚期pLELC患者提供了显著的生存益处。基线EBV-DNA水平,PD-L1表达,以及基线和动态STM变化是治疗反应的重要预测因素,强调了对这种独特亚型肺癌个性化治疗方法的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Stromal tumor-associated eosinophils predict therapeutic resistance and survival in locally advanced tongue squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy. A computer vision method to evaluate tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and multiparametric modeling of neoadjuvant systemic therapy response in breast cancer. Induction chemotherapy administration increases the risk of radiation pneumonitis in unresectable stage III NSCLC patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy with immunotherapy. Clinical subtypes in breast cancer patients with brain metastases from an ambispective registry of advanced breast cancer, GEICAM/2014-03 (RegistEM). Sequential or upfront triple combination with durvalumab, tremelimumab, and bevacizumab for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: the MONTBLANC trial protocol (AIO-HEP-0325/ass).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1