A Graph-Based Statistical Approach to Identifying Functional Connectivity Networks in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 0.8 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Iranian Journal of Child Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-07 DOI:10.22037/ijcn.v19i1.44921
Samaneh Talebi, Fatemeh Pourmotahari, Keyvan Olazadeh, Hamid Alavi Majd, Seyyed Mohammad Tabatabaei
{"title":"A Graph-Based Statistical Approach to Identifying Functional Connectivity Networks in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Samaneh Talebi, Fatemeh Pourmotahari, Keyvan Olazadeh, Hamid Alavi Majd, Seyyed Mohammad Tabatabaei","doi":"10.22037/ijcn.v19i1.44921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the most common types of brain injuries associated with cognitive impairments. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies can provide a unique opportunity to examine brain connectivity patterns and understand the neural substrates of cognitive outcomes following traumatic injury. Therefore, this study aims to determine changes in functional connectivity patterns in patients with TBI compared to healthy individuals using two graph models, adaptive dense subgraph discovery (ADSD) and variance component.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>This study used fMRI data downloaded from https://openneuro.org. These data included 14 patients with TBI aged between 18 and 36 and 12 healthy individuals (female: N=6, male: N=6) aged between 19 and 52. Out of the 74 regions examined, a cluster of 18 regions related to TBI was identified using the ADSD model. Subsequently, these identified regions were used as input for the variance component model to investigate changes in connectivity patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Functional connectivity between an 18-brain region cluster, such as the Rectus (Left, Right), Supp_Motor_Area (Left, Right), and Middle Cingulum (Left, Right), differed between the patient and healthy groups. Based on the analysis of functional connectivity between pairs of brain regions, 153 connections between pairs of brain regions were compared in the two groups, out of which 63 connections showed significant differences between the two groups. Compared to other regions, Supp_Motor_Area_Right and Rectus_Left had more connections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study's results indicate that the functional connectivity between the Cingulum, Hippocampus, Fusiform, Supp_Motor_Area, and Precentral regions differs between the two groups. Since these regions are involved in processes such as memory, learning, spatial orientation, face recognition, coordination, and motor control, changes in their functional connectivity may lead to impairments in these areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":14537,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology","volume":"19 1","pages":"65-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v19i1.44921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the most common types of brain injuries associated with cognitive impairments. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies can provide a unique opportunity to examine brain connectivity patterns and understand the neural substrates of cognitive outcomes following traumatic injury. Therefore, this study aims to determine changes in functional connectivity patterns in patients with TBI compared to healthy individuals using two graph models, adaptive dense subgraph discovery (ADSD) and variance component.

Materials & methods: This study used fMRI data downloaded from https://openneuro.org. These data included 14 patients with TBI aged between 18 and 36 and 12 healthy individuals (female: N=6, male: N=6) aged between 19 and 52. Out of the 74 regions examined, a cluster of 18 regions related to TBI was identified using the ADSD model. Subsequently, these identified regions were used as input for the variance component model to investigate changes in connectivity patterns.

Results: Functional connectivity between an 18-brain region cluster, such as the Rectus (Left, Right), Supp_Motor_Area (Left, Right), and Middle Cingulum (Left, Right), differed between the patient and healthy groups. Based on the analysis of functional connectivity between pairs of brain regions, 153 connections between pairs of brain regions were compared in the two groups, out of which 63 connections showed significant differences between the two groups. Compared to other regions, Supp_Motor_Area_Right and Rectus_Left had more connections.

Conclusion: The study's results indicate that the functional connectivity between the Cingulum, Hippocampus, Fusiform, Supp_Motor_Area, and Precentral regions differs between the two groups. Since these regions are involved in processes such as memory, learning, spatial orientation, face recognition, coordination, and motor control, changes in their functional connectivity may lead to impairments in these areas.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
A Graph-Based Statistical Approach to Identifying Functional Connectivity Networks in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. Acute Encephalopathy and Refractory Hypokalemia in a 12-Year-Old Boy. Causes of Neonatal Stroke: Ibn Thalaj's (Died in 975 AD) Viewpoints. Correlation between Electrodiagnostic Findings and Cerebrospinal Fluid Changes in Children with Guillain-Barre syndrome. From Diabetes to Neuropathy: A Diagnostic Journey to Leigh Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1