Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Can Effectively Avoid Unnecessary Extended Resection for Gastric Cancer with Clinical Evidence of Duodenum or Pancreas Head Involvement.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7150/jca.105534
Qianna Jin, Jiaqing Cao, Guobin Wang, Nan He
{"title":"Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Can Effectively Avoid Unnecessary Extended Resection for Gastric Cancer with Clinical Evidence of Duodenum or Pancreas Head Involvement.","authors":"Qianna Jin, Jiaqing Cao, Guobin Wang, Nan He","doi":"10.7150/jca.105534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This study aims to compare the efficacy of two treatment strategies for gastric cancer with clinical evidence of pancreatic head or duodenal involvement: gastrectomy combined with pancreaticoduodenectomy (GPD) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (NCS). <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective analysis of patient data from January 2012 to January 2022 was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of these two treatment strategies. <b>Results:</b> The study included 284 patients, comprising 78 in the GPD group and 206 in the NCS group. In the NCS group, 119 patients required extended pancreaticoduodenectomy, a significantly smaller proportion compared to the GPD group (p < 0.001). The NCS group successfully avoided unnecessary extended pancreaticoduodenectomy. In contrast, 15 patients in the GPD group underwent surgery despite postoperative pathological confirmation of no pancreatic head or duodenal involvement (p < 0.001). The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIb complications was significantly greater in the GPD group than in the NCS group (10.3% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.034). Overall survival was significantly longer in the NCS group, with a median of 25 months compared to 20 months in the GPD group (p = 0.0005). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that tumor diameter ≥7 cm and N3 stage were independent adverse prognostic factors. <b>Conclusion:</b> Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with gastric cancer presenting clinical evidence of pancreatic head or duodenal involvement. This approach reduces unnecessary extended surgeries, lowers complication rates, and improves overall survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":15183,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer","volume":"16 4","pages":"1181-1188"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.105534","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to compare the efficacy of two treatment strategies for gastric cancer with clinical evidence of pancreatic head or duodenal involvement: gastrectomy combined with pancreaticoduodenectomy (GPD) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (NCS). Methods: A retrospective analysis of patient data from January 2012 to January 2022 was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of these two treatment strategies. Results: The study included 284 patients, comprising 78 in the GPD group and 206 in the NCS group. In the NCS group, 119 patients required extended pancreaticoduodenectomy, a significantly smaller proportion compared to the GPD group (p < 0.001). The NCS group successfully avoided unnecessary extended pancreaticoduodenectomy. In contrast, 15 patients in the GPD group underwent surgery despite postoperative pathological confirmation of no pancreatic head or duodenal involvement (p < 0.001). The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIb complications was significantly greater in the GPD group than in the NCS group (10.3% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.034). Overall survival was significantly longer in the NCS group, with a median of 25 months compared to 20 months in the GPD group (p = 0.0005). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that tumor diameter ≥7 cm and N3 stage were independent adverse prognostic factors. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with gastric cancer presenting clinical evidence of pancreatic head or duodenal involvement. This approach reduces unnecessary extended surgeries, lowers complication rates, and improves overall survival.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer
Journal of Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
333
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal with broad scope covering all areas of cancer research, especially novel concepts, new methods, new regimens, new therapeutic agents, and alternative approaches for early detection and intervention of cancer. The Journal is supported by an international editorial board consisting of a distinguished team of cancer researchers. Journal of Cancer aims at rapid publication of high quality results in cancer research while maintaining rigorous peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
ADAM10 is a key player in the diagnosis, prognosis and metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Addition of Bevacizumab to Vinorelbine-Platinum combination is efficacious in Heavily Pretreated HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer. KLK7 Involvement in Thyroid Papillary Carcinoma Cell Migration and Invasion by EMT via MAPK/ERK Pathways. NUPR1 contributes to endocrine therapy resistance by modulating BIRC5 expression and inducing luminal B-ERBB2+ subtype-like characteristics in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells. The Impact of MET Variants in Oral Cancer Progression and Clinicopathological Characteristics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1