Comparison of Urinary Red Blood Cell Distribution (URD) and Dysmorphic Red Blood Cells for Detecting Glomerular Hematuria: A Multicenter Study

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1002/jcla.25159
A-Jin Lee, Hae In Bang, Sun Min Lee, Dongil Won, Myung Seo Kang, Hyun-ji Choi, In Hee Lee, Chang-Ho Jeon
{"title":"Comparison of Urinary Red Blood Cell Distribution (URD) and Dysmorphic Red Blood Cells for Detecting Glomerular Hematuria: A Multicenter Study","authors":"A-Jin Lee,&nbsp;Hae In Bang,&nbsp;Sun Min Lee,&nbsp;Dongil Won,&nbsp;Myung Seo Kang,&nbsp;Hyun-ji Choi,&nbsp;In Hee Lee,&nbsp;Chang-Ho Jeon","doi":"10.1002/jcla.25159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The clinical utility of urinary red blood cell (RBC) distribution (URD) remains limited. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of URD and dysmorphic RBC (dRBC) in a multicenter study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study enrolled 703 patients who visited four tertiary medical centers in Korea. Patients were classified into glomerular diseases with biopsy (<i>N</i> = 169), renal diseases including chronic kidney disease (<i>N</i> = 194), nephrotic syndrome (NS; <i>N</i> = 88), tubulointerstitial diseases (<i>N</i> = 36), acute kidney injury (<i>N</i> = 32), others (<i>N</i> = 10), and extrarenal diseases (<i>N</i> = 174). Renal parameters, urine microscopic examination, urinalysis, and URD assessments were conducted. The diagnostic performances of dRBC and URD were evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Median values of both dRBC and URD were significantly elevated in patients with glomerular diseases. URD exhibited a significant correlation with dRBC (<i>r</i> = 0.536) and albumin creatinine ratio (<i>r</i> = 0.186), while no significant correlation was observed with specific gravity (<i>r</i> = −0.03). Among renal diseases, dRBC and URD values were notably higher in patients with NS. The agreement rate between dRBC and URD results was 78.3% (112/143), with 31 instances showing discrepancies. ROC curve analysis comparing glomerular and extrarenal diseases yielded cutoff values of 18% for dRBC and 31.9% for URD, resulting in corresponding areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 and 0.83, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>URD exhibited a comparable diagnostic performance, as indicated by a similar AUC value to that of dRBC, while offering the added advantage of providing objective and standardizable results. This attribute enhances its utility as a parameter for distinguishing between patients with glomerular hematuria (GH) and those with non-GH.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","volume":"39 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcla.25159","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcla.25159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The clinical utility of urinary red blood cell (RBC) distribution (URD) remains limited. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of URD and dysmorphic RBC (dRBC) in a multicenter study.

Methods

This study enrolled 703 patients who visited four tertiary medical centers in Korea. Patients were classified into glomerular diseases with biopsy (N = 169), renal diseases including chronic kidney disease (N = 194), nephrotic syndrome (NS; N = 88), tubulointerstitial diseases (N = 36), acute kidney injury (N = 32), others (N = 10), and extrarenal diseases (N = 174). Renal parameters, urine microscopic examination, urinalysis, and URD assessments were conducted. The diagnostic performances of dRBC and URD were evaluated.

Results

Median values of both dRBC and URD were significantly elevated in patients with glomerular diseases. URD exhibited a significant correlation with dRBC (r = 0.536) and albumin creatinine ratio (r = 0.186), while no significant correlation was observed with specific gravity (r = −0.03). Among renal diseases, dRBC and URD values were notably higher in patients with NS. The agreement rate between dRBC and URD results was 78.3% (112/143), with 31 instances showing discrepancies. ROC curve analysis comparing glomerular and extrarenal diseases yielded cutoff values of 18% for dRBC and 31.9% for URD, resulting in corresponding areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 and 0.83, respectively.

Conclusions

URD exhibited a comparable diagnostic performance, as indicated by a similar AUC value to that of dRBC, while offering the added advantage of providing objective and standardizable results. This attribute enhances its utility as a parameter for distinguishing between patients with glomerular hematuria (GH) and those with non-GH.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尿红细胞分布(URD)和畸形红细胞检测肾小球血尿的比较:一项多中心研究。
背景:尿红细胞(RBC)分布(URD)的临床应用仍然有限。本研究旨在在一项多中心研究中比较URD和畸形红细胞(dRBC)的诊断性能。方法:本研究纳入了703名患者,他们在韩国的4个三级医疗中心就诊。通过活检将患者分为肾小球疾病(N = 169)、肾脏疾病包括慢性肾病(N = 194)、肾病综合征(NS;88例)、小管间质性疾病(36例)、急性肾损伤(32例)、其他(10例)、肾外疾病(174例)。进行肾脏参数、尿镜检查、尿液分析和URD评估。评价dRBC和URD的诊断性能。结果:肾小球疾病患者dRBC和URD的中位值均显著升高。URD与dRBC (r = 0.536)、白蛋白肌酐比值(r = 0.186)有显著相关性,与比重无显著相关性(r = -0.03)。在肾脏疾病中,NS患者的dRBC和URD值明显较高。dRBC和URD结果的符合率为78.3%(112/143),有31例出现差异。比较肾小球和肾外疾病的ROC曲线分析显示,dRBC和URD的截断值分别为18%和31.9%,相应的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.79和0.83。结论:URD表现出与dRBC相似的AUC值,具有相当的诊断性能,同时具有提供客观和标准化结果的额外优势。这一属性增强了其作为区分肾小球性血尿(GH)和非GH患者的参数的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis publishes original articles on newly developing modes of technology and laboratory assays, with emphasis on their application in current and future clinical laboratory testing. This includes reports from the following fields: immunochemistry and toxicology, hematology and hematopathology, immunopathology, molecular diagnostics, microbiology, genetic testing, immunohematology, and clinical chemistry.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Soluble Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells 2 (sTREM2) in Cerebrospinal Fluid, Serum, and Plasma Using the Fully Automated Lumipulse Platform. RETRACTION: Potentiality of Forkhead Box Q1 as a Biomarker for Monitoring Tumor Features and Predicting Prognosis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. RETRACTION: Katanin P80 as a Prognostic Biomarker Associated With Tumor Progression in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. RETRACTION: AKIP1 Expression in Tumor Tissue as a New Biomarker for Disease Monitoring and Prognosis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results of a Retrospective Study. RETRACTION: Guanylate-Binding Protein 1 Correlates With Advanced Tumor Features and Serves as a Prognostic Biomarker for Worse Survival in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1