Rehabilitation Management of Neck Pain—Development of a Diagnostic Framework Based on the Pain and Disability Drivers Management Model

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of evaluation in clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1111/jep.14299
Thomas Gerard, Florian Naye, Simon Decary, Pierre Langevin, Chad Cook, Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme
{"title":"Rehabilitation Management of Neck Pain—Development of a Diagnostic Framework Based on the Pain and Disability Drivers Management Model","authors":"Thomas Gerard,&nbsp;Florian Naye,&nbsp;Simon Decary,&nbsp;Pierre Langevin,&nbsp;Chad Cook,&nbsp;Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme","doi":"10.1111/jep.14299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>Neck pain is a major cause of disability worldwide, and current rehabilitation strategies show limited effectiveness. Subgrouping patients by their primary pain and disability drivers can help tailor treatments. At this end, the Pain and Disability Drivers Management (PDDM) was developed and has demonstrated preliminary effectiveness in the management of low back pain. Nevertheless, the PDDM model was only validated for this population. Adapting this framework to patients with neck pain would provide a more global view of the patient's experience of pain and support a genuine biopsychosocial intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to develop and validate the content of the PDDM model for patients living with neck pain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Through a modified DELPHI study design, participants with clinical and research expertize in rehabilitation of neck pain were invited to participate. A questionnaire was developed using literature reviews and endorsed by a steering committee. The relevance of each element of the newly adapted model was evaluated on a 4-point Likert scale. An item reached consensus if it obtained the predefined threshold of &gt; 78% “relevant” and “very relevant.” Participants left comments on terminology and recommended items to add in early rounds. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>An invitation was sent to 1650 potential participants, from which 155 accessed the survey, 64 completed the first round and 55 the second round. A total of 70 elements met consensus and were distributed across six domains: “Nociceptive pain drivers”, “nociplastic pain drivers,” “drivers associated with neuropathic pain”, “comorbidity drivers”, “cognitive-emotional drivers” and “environmental or lifestyle drivers, and social determinants of health.”</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Through a modified DELPHI study, the PDDM model was updated and adapted to people with neck pain. Subsequent steps include clinical integration and measures of efficacy when used for assessment/treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jep.14299","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale

Neck pain is a major cause of disability worldwide, and current rehabilitation strategies show limited effectiveness. Subgrouping patients by their primary pain and disability drivers can help tailor treatments. At this end, the Pain and Disability Drivers Management (PDDM) was developed and has demonstrated preliminary effectiveness in the management of low back pain. Nevertheless, the PDDM model was only validated for this population. Adapting this framework to patients with neck pain would provide a more global view of the patient's experience of pain and support a genuine biopsychosocial intervention.

Aims and Objectives

The aim of this study was to develop and validate the content of the PDDM model for patients living with neck pain.

Methods

Through a modified DELPHI study design, participants with clinical and research expertize in rehabilitation of neck pain were invited to participate. A questionnaire was developed using literature reviews and endorsed by a steering committee. The relevance of each element of the newly adapted model was evaluated on a 4-point Likert scale. An item reached consensus if it obtained the predefined threshold of > 78% “relevant” and “very relevant.” Participants left comments on terminology and recommended items to add in early rounds. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed.

Results

An invitation was sent to 1650 potential participants, from which 155 accessed the survey, 64 completed the first round and 55 the second round. A total of 70 elements met consensus and were distributed across six domains: “Nociceptive pain drivers”, “nociplastic pain drivers,” “drivers associated with neuropathic pain”, “comorbidity drivers”, “cognitive-emotional drivers” and “environmental or lifestyle drivers, and social determinants of health.”

Conclusion

Through a modified DELPHI study, the PDDM model was updated and adapted to people with neck pain. Subsequent steps include clinical integration and measures of efficacy when used for assessment/treatment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
期刊最新文献
Trajectories and Influencing Factors of Self-Management Behaviour in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Longitudinal Study Development and Validation of an Instrument to Assess Quality and Completeness of Medication-Related Discharge Documentation Overcoming the Utopian Perspectives on Health: Health Must Also Include States of Unwell-Being Associations Between COVID-19 Vaccination Status and Persistent Symptoms: A Prospective Study of Reproductive-Age Women A Comparison of Patient Self-Reported Fatigue in the FRAIL Scale With a Validated Fatigue Measure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1