Evaluation of External Apical Root Resorption and the Relevance of Intermediate Radiography in Non-Extraction Treatment With Fixed Appliances for Adolescents With Crowding: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial Using CBCT.
Kristina Johansson, Helena Christell, Anna Brechter, Liselotte Paulsson
{"title":"Evaluation of External Apical Root Resorption and the Relevance of Intermediate Radiography in Non-Extraction Treatment With Fixed Appliances for Adolescents With Crowding: A Multicenter Randomised Controlled Trial Using CBCT.","authors":"Kristina Johansson, Helena Christell, Anna Brechter, Liselotte Paulsson","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives are to assess the severity and frequency of clinically relevant external apical root resorption (EARR) ≥ 2 mm during orthodontic treatment with Damon passive self-ligating and Victory conventional standardised fixed appliance systems and to evaluate the relevance of intermediate radiographic examinations for early detection and prevention of severe EARR.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Adolescents aged 12-17 years with crowded and displaced teeth planned for non-extraction treatment were recruited from three orthodontic clinics. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with either Damon Q (n = 35) or Victory (n = 40) using stratified blocks, with allocation concealed. EARR was assessed for all roots from incisors to molars using multiplanar reconstruction in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images acquired from various CBCT machines before, during and after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two patients were included in the EARR analysis. The upper incisors were the most affected tooth group, with mean EARR values of 0.20 mm for Damon and 0.51 mm for Victory (NS, alpha 1%). The frequency of clinically relevant EARR in this tooth group was 5.0% for Damon and 7.2% for Victory (NS, alpha 5%). Only one case with clinically relevant EARR after treatment was identified in the intermediate radiographic examinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall severity and frequency of EARR were below clinically relevant levels in both treatment groups. The results strengthen the evidence that routine intermediate radiography appears to be of limited relevance for early detection and prevention of severe EARR in non-extraction treatments for adolescents with crowded teeth.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05664282.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12903","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The objectives are to assess the severity and frequency of clinically relevant external apical root resorption (EARR) ≥ 2 mm during orthodontic treatment with Damon passive self-ligating and Victory conventional standardised fixed appliance systems and to evaluate the relevance of intermediate radiographic examinations for early detection and prevention of severe EARR.
Materials and methods: Adolescents aged 12-17 years with crowded and displaced teeth planned for non-extraction treatment were recruited from three orthodontic clinics. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with either Damon Q (n = 35) or Victory (n = 40) using stratified blocks, with allocation concealed. EARR was assessed for all roots from incisors to molars using multiplanar reconstruction in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images acquired from various CBCT machines before, during and after treatment.
Results: Sixty-two patients were included in the EARR analysis. The upper incisors were the most affected tooth group, with mean EARR values of 0.20 mm for Damon and 0.51 mm for Victory (NS, alpha 1%). The frequency of clinically relevant EARR in this tooth group was 5.0% for Damon and 7.2% for Victory (NS, alpha 5%). Only one case with clinically relevant EARR after treatment was identified in the intermediate radiographic examinations.
Conclusions: The overall severity and frequency of EARR were below clinically relevant levels in both treatment groups. The results strengthen the evidence that routine intermediate radiography appears to be of limited relevance for early detection and prevention of severe EARR in non-extraction treatments for adolescents with crowded teeth.
期刊介绍:
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions.
The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements.
The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.