Nathaniel E Smith, William O'Connell, Rebecca Johnson, George Leonard
{"title":"Holistic Tri-Service Military Pathology: A Proposed Paradigm for Consolidation.","authors":"Nathaniel E Smith, William O'Connell, Rebecca Johnson, George Leonard","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Historically, military anatomic pathology (AP) services have been significantly compartmentalized, with each branch independently executing its laboratory support mission. The result is redundant and costly duplication of nearly identical services in close geographic proximity. The duplication of AP services disperses the overall caseload, resulting in pathologist diagnostic acumen atrophy, excessive support personnel requirements, inadequate utilization of subspecialty expertise, and overall lower-quality patient care. Unlike many medical specialties, implementing AP services does not require direct patient interaction and is principally not as time-sensitive as other clinical laboratory testing. The practice of AP is conducive to a more consolidatory paradigm to achieve economies of scale. Pathology service unification would also afford the stationing of predominantly subspecialists at tertiary care centers to handle higher caseloads. Larger groups of pathologists increase patient safety enhancing peer-to-peer and subspeciality quality assurance processes during case review. Conversely, the nature of clinical pathology services requires a more widespread presence-even at the smaller, auxiliary clinics throughout the military health system. Clinical pathology services would also benefit from additional triservice cooperation including standardization of quality management processes, increased resource sharing, exchange, and cooperative contingency planning. Laboratory directorships also benefit from consolidating expertise, where pathologists could be physically located at a central site with remote oversight of laboratory services. Here, we propose a holistic triservice consolidation plan for military pathology to optimize resource utilization and ultimately realize the overarching strategic plan for military medicine set forth by the Defense Health Agency.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Historically, military anatomic pathology (AP) services have been significantly compartmentalized, with each branch independently executing its laboratory support mission. The result is redundant and costly duplication of nearly identical services in close geographic proximity. The duplication of AP services disperses the overall caseload, resulting in pathologist diagnostic acumen atrophy, excessive support personnel requirements, inadequate utilization of subspecialty expertise, and overall lower-quality patient care. Unlike many medical specialties, implementing AP services does not require direct patient interaction and is principally not as time-sensitive as other clinical laboratory testing. The practice of AP is conducive to a more consolidatory paradigm to achieve economies of scale. Pathology service unification would also afford the stationing of predominantly subspecialists at tertiary care centers to handle higher caseloads. Larger groups of pathologists increase patient safety enhancing peer-to-peer and subspeciality quality assurance processes during case review. Conversely, the nature of clinical pathology services requires a more widespread presence-even at the smaller, auxiliary clinics throughout the military health system. Clinical pathology services would also benefit from additional triservice cooperation including standardization of quality management processes, increased resource sharing, exchange, and cooperative contingency planning. Laboratory directorships also benefit from consolidating expertise, where pathologists could be physically located at a central site with remote oversight of laboratory services. Here, we propose a holistic triservice consolidation plan for military pathology to optimize resource utilization and ultimately realize the overarching strategic plan for military medicine set forth by the Defense Health Agency.
期刊介绍:
Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor.
The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.