Navigating the Modern Landscape of Social Media: Ethical Considerations for Research With Adolescents and Young Adults.

IF 1.7 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY Translational Issues in Psychological Science Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1037/tps0000408
Julie V Cristello, Megan Strowger, Megan A Moreno, Elisa M Trucco
{"title":"Navigating the Modern Landscape of Social Media: Ethical Considerations for Research With Adolescents and Young Adults.","authors":"Julie V Cristello, Megan Strowger, Megan A Moreno, Elisa M Trucco","doi":"10.1037/tps0000408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Engagement on social media among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) is almost universal. AYAs use social media for socialization, connection, and expression, as well as to obtain news and information. Adolescence and young adulthood also represent developmental periods characterized by the emergence of risk behaviors and many forms of psychopathology. Given that risk behaviors and mental health depictions are often displayed and observed online, social media platforms have become an optimal research tool to examine AYA behaviors that may not be visible offline. Social media platforms have the potential to increase recruitment and retention, especially among hard-to-reach, and understudied youth, and to connect AYA with resources for risk behaviors and mental health in a more naturalistic setting. Despite these advantages, the limited consensus on social media ethics across institutions and internal review boards, and the rapidly evolving features on each platform has made it difficult to develop study protocols, navigate and adapt to platform changes, and predict ethical issues that may arise in the context of research. Thus, the purpose of this manuscript is to discuss ethical considerations specific to AYA in social media research. Two research approaches, self-report and observational, are discussed with a focus on informed consent, privacy, and confidentiality. The goal of this manuscript is to highlight the nuances associated with social media research, and the implications for the promotion of ethical practices when adopting social media as a research tool to improve our understanding of AYA behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":29959,"journal":{"name":"Translational Issues in Psychological Science","volume":"10 2","pages":"123-134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784637/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Issues in Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engagement on social media among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) is almost universal. AYAs use social media for socialization, connection, and expression, as well as to obtain news and information. Adolescence and young adulthood also represent developmental periods characterized by the emergence of risk behaviors and many forms of psychopathology. Given that risk behaviors and mental health depictions are often displayed and observed online, social media platforms have become an optimal research tool to examine AYA behaviors that may not be visible offline. Social media platforms have the potential to increase recruitment and retention, especially among hard-to-reach, and understudied youth, and to connect AYA with resources for risk behaviors and mental health in a more naturalistic setting. Despite these advantages, the limited consensus on social media ethics across institutions and internal review boards, and the rapidly evolving features on each platform has made it difficult to develop study protocols, navigate and adapt to platform changes, and predict ethical issues that may arise in the context of research. Thus, the purpose of this manuscript is to discuss ethical considerations specific to AYA in social media research. Two research approaches, self-report and observational, are discussed with a focus on informed consent, privacy, and confidentiality. The goal of this manuscript is to highlight the nuances associated with social media research, and the implications for the promotion of ethical practices when adopting social media as a research tool to improve our understanding of AYA behavior.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导航社会媒体的现代景观:与青少年和年轻人研究的伦理考虑。
青少年和年轻人(AYAs)对社交媒体的参与几乎是普遍的。AYAs使用社交媒体进行社交、联系和表达,以及获取新闻和信息。青春期和青年期也代表着以危险行为和多种形式的精神病理出现为特征的发育时期。鉴于风险行为和心理健康描述经常在网上显示和观察,社交媒体平台已成为检查AYA行为的最佳研究工具,这些行为可能在线下看不到。社交媒体平台有可能增加招聘和保留,特别是在难以接触和学习不足的年轻人中,并在更自然的环境中将AYA与风险行为和心理健康资源联系起来。尽管有这些优势,但各机构和内部审查委员会对社交媒体伦理的有限共识,以及每个平台上快速发展的功能,使得制定研究方案、导航和适应平台变化以及预测研究背景下可能出现的伦理问题变得困难。因此,本文的目的是讨论社交媒体研究中特定于AYA的伦理考虑。两种研究方法,自我报告和观察,重点讨论知情同意,隐私和保密。本文的目的是强调与社交媒体研究相关的细微差别,以及在采用社交媒体作为研究工具以提高我们对AYA行为的理解时促进道德实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Adolescents' Perceptions of Parenting Behaviors Mediate the Association of Maternal Childhood Abuse with Adolescent Externalizing Behaviors. Bidirectional and Temporal Associations between Daily Reports of Parental Burnout, Parenting Experiences, and Motivations for Family Screen Use. Diagnostic Patterns and Racial/Ethnic Differences in Antipsychotic Prescribing Among Privately Insured Youth. Commentary on Translational Impact: The Promise of Audience Segmentation for Enhancing the Dissemination of Online Mental Health Resources. Flourishing as resilience: Flourishing among Hispanic/Latino adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1