Ultrasound evaluation of gallbladder wall thickness for predicting severe dengue: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.9 Q2 Medicine Ultrasound Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1186/s13089-025-00417-5
Amirhossein Shahsavand Davoudi, Hamid Harandi, Reza Samiee, Shayan Forghani, Keyhan Mohammadi, Maryam Shafaati
{"title":"Ultrasound evaluation of gallbladder wall thickness for predicting severe dengue: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Amirhossein Shahsavand Davoudi, Hamid Harandi, Reza Samiee, Shayan Forghani, Keyhan Mohammadi, Maryam Shafaati","doi":"10.1186/s13089-025-00417-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of dengue fever (DF), a mosquito-borne viral disease, is rising worldwide. Its severe manifestations like thrombocytopenia and plasma leakage are associated with increased mortality. Ultrasound-detected gallbladder wall thickening (GBWT) has been suggested as a potential indicator of the severity of the disease.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the predictive value of GBWT in identifying patients at risk for severe dengue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a systematic search of Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Among the inclusion criteria were original studies that assessed GBWT across various dengue severity categories. Then, we performed a meta-analysis using a random effects model and subgroup analyses based on severity criteria to determine the relationship between GBWT and severe dengue.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the meta-analysis, 19 studies qualified for the inclusion criteria. There was a significant association between GBWT and severe dengue, according to the odds ratio (OR) of 2.35 (95% CI 1.88-2.82, p < 0.001). The subgroup analysis revealed consistent results for thrombocytopenia (OR: 2.65) and plasma leakage (OR: 2.26), among other severity criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A reliable ultrasound indicator, GBWT can help identify patients at risk for severe dengue early on, improving clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. However, the possibility of differential diagnosis requires cautious interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-025-00417-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of dengue fever (DF), a mosquito-borne viral disease, is rising worldwide. Its severe manifestations like thrombocytopenia and plasma leakage are associated with increased mortality. Ultrasound-detected gallbladder wall thickening (GBWT) has been suggested as a potential indicator of the severity of the disease.

Aims: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the predictive value of GBWT in identifying patients at risk for severe dengue.

Methods: Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a systematic search of Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Among the inclusion criteria were original studies that assessed GBWT across various dengue severity categories. Then, we performed a meta-analysis using a random effects model and subgroup analyses based on severity criteria to determine the relationship between GBWT and severe dengue.

Results: For the meta-analysis, 19 studies qualified for the inclusion criteria. There was a significant association between GBWT and severe dengue, according to the odds ratio (OR) of 2.35 (95% CI 1.88-2.82, p < 0.001). The subgroup analysis revealed consistent results for thrombocytopenia (OR: 2.65) and plasma leakage (OR: 2.26), among other severity criteria.

Conclusions: A reliable ultrasound indicator, GBWT can help identify patients at risk for severe dengue early on, improving clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. However, the possibility of differential diagnosis requires cautious interpretation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声评估胆囊壁厚度预测严重登革热:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:登革热(DF)是一种蚊媒病毒性疾病,在世界范围内的流行率正在上升。其严重表现如血小板减少和血浆渗漏与死亡率增加有关。超声检测胆囊壁增厚(GBWT)已被认为是疾病严重程度的潜在指标。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了GBWT在识别严重登革热风险患者中的预测价值。方法:根据PRISMA 2020指南,我们对Web of Science、PubMed、Embase和Scopus进行了系统的检索。纳入标准中包括评估不同登革热严重程度类别的GBWT的原始研究。然后,我们使用随机效应模型和基于严重程度标准的亚组分析进行meta分析,以确定GBWT与严重登革热之间的关系。结果:在荟萃分析中,有19项研究符合纳入标准。根据比值比(OR)为2.35 (95% CI 1.88-2.82, p), GBWT与严重登革热之间存在显著相关性。结论:GBWT是一种可靠的超声指标,可以帮助早期识别有严重登革热风险的患者,改善临床决策和患者预后。然而,鉴别诊断的可能性需要谨慎的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonographic Signs of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis and Treatment Response Monitoring in HIV-Positive and -Negative Populations. Feasibility of measuring left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral as a predictor for stroke volume in pregnant women in labor. From concepts to evaluation: mapping approaches to POCUS training assessment in low- and middle-income countries - a systematic scoping review. Ultrasound-guided lymph node biopsies: feasible and safe use of pathology services in a resource-limited, high TB/HIV prevalence setting. On the interception of the optimal imaging plane for pleural line scanning with automatic robot assisted lung ultrasound: An experimental study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1