Target identification under high levels of amplitude, size, orientation and background uncertainty.

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Vision Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1167/jov.25.2.3
Can Oluk, Wilson S Geisler
{"title":"Target identification under high levels of amplitude, size, orientation and background uncertainty.","authors":"Can Oluk, Wilson S Geisler","doi":"10.1167/jov.25.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many natural tasks require the visual system to classify image patches accurately into target categories, including the category of no target. Natural target categories often involve high levels of within-category variability (uncertainty), making it challenging to uncover the underlying computational mechanisms. Here, we describe these tasks as identification from a set of exhaustive, mutually exclusive target categories, each partitioned into mutually exclusive subcategories. We derive the optimal decision rule and present a computational method to simulate performance for moderately large and complex tasks. We focus on the detection of an additive wavelet target in white noise with five dimensions of stimulus uncertainty: target amplitude, orientation, scale, background contrast, and spatial pattern. We compare the performance of the ideal observer with various heuristic observers. We find that a properly normalized heuristic MAX observer (SNN-MAX) approximates optimal performance. We also find that a convolutional neural network trained on this task approaches but does not reach optimal performance, even with extensive training. We measured human performance on a task with three of these dimensions of uncertainty (orientation, scale, and background pattern). Results show that the pattern of hits and correct rejections for the ideal and SNN-MAX observers (but not a simple MAX observer) aligns with the data. Additionally, we measured performance without scale and orientation uncertainty and found that the effect of uncertainty on performance was less than predicted by any model. This unexpectedly small effect can largely be explained by incorporating biologically plausible levels of intrinsic position uncertainty into the models.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"25 2","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.2.3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many natural tasks require the visual system to classify image patches accurately into target categories, including the category of no target. Natural target categories often involve high levels of within-category variability (uncertainty), making it challenging to uncover the underlying computational mechanisms. Here, we describe these tasks as identification from a set of exhaustive, mutually exclusive target categories, each partitioned into mutually exclusive subcategories. We derive the optimal decision rule and present a computational method to simulate performance for moderately large and complex tasks. We focus on the detection of an additive wavelet target in white noise with five dimensions of stimulus uncertainty: target amplitude, orientation, scale, background contrast, and spatial pattern. We compare the performance of the ideal observer with various heuristic observers. We find that a properly normalized heuristic MAX observer (SNN-MAX) approximates optimal performance. We also find that a convolutional neural network trained on this task approaches but does not reach optimal performance, even with extensive training. We measured human performance on a task with three of these dimensions of uncertainty (orientation, scale, and background pattern). Results show that the pattern of hits and correct rejections for the ideal and SNN-MAX observers (but not a simple MAX observer) aligns with the data. Additionally, we measured performance without scale and orientation uncertainty and found that the effect of uncertainty on performance was less than predicted by any model. This unexpectedly small effect can largely be explained by incorporating biologically plausible levels of intrinsic position uncertainty into the models.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高度振幅、大小、方向和背景不确定性下的目标识别。
许多自然任务需要视觉系统准确地将图像块划分为目标类别,包括无目标类别。自然目标类别通常涉及高水平的类别内可变性(不确定性),这使得揭示潜在的计算机制具有挑战性。在这里,我们将这些任务描述为从一组详尽的、互斥的目标类别中进行识别,每个目标类别划分为互斥的子类别。我们推导了最优决策规则,并提出了一种计算方法来模拟中等规模和复杂任务的性能。研究了具有目标振幅、方向、尺度、背景对比度和空间模式五个刺激不确定性维度的加性小波目标在白噪声中的检测问题。我们比较了理想观测器与各种启发式观测器的性能。我们发现一个适当归一化的启发式MAX观测器(SNN-MAX)近似于最优性能。我们还发现,在这个任务上训练的卷积神经网络即使经过广泛的训练,也不能达到最佳性能。我们用不确定性的三个维度(方向、规模和背景模式)来衡量人类在任务中的表现。结果表明,理想和SNN-MAX观察者(但不是简单的MAX观察者)的命中和正确拒绝模式与数据一致。此外,我们在没有尺度和方向不确定性的情况下测量绩效,发现不确定性对绩效的影响小于任何模型的预测。这种意想不到的小影响很大程度上可以通过将生物学上合理的内在位置不确定性水平纳入模型来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
期刊最新文献
Asymmetries in hue percepts and early cortical color coding: Evidence from chromatic visual evoked potentials. Social wayfinding in virtual reality: Navigational decisions and eye movements in a dynamic environment. Saccades to spatially extended objects: The roles of observer goals and part-structure cues in determining within-object landing position. The development of object representations in children. Evaluating lawful relationships in saccadic eye movements with simulated vision impairment: A proof-of-concept study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1