Psychophysically measuring the efficiency of rods.

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Vision Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1167/jov.25.2.1
Geneviève Rodrigue, Laurine Paris, Judith Renaud, Rémy Allard
{"title":"Psychophysically measuring the efficiency of rods.","authors":"Geneviève Rodrigue, Laurine Paris, Judith Renaud, Rémy Allard","doi":"10.1167/jov.25.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent studies suggest that the efficiency of cones to detect photons can be evaluated by measuring the equivalent input noise (EIN; derived from contrast thresholds measured in the presence and absence of visual noise) under specific conditions in which the contrast threshold is limited by the variability in the number of photons detected by photoreceptors (i.e., photon noise). These conditions can be identified based on the known properties of photon noise: spatially and temporally white and inversely proportional to the luminance intensity. The present study aims to adapt this psychophysical paradigm to evaluate the efficiency of rods to detect photons. A motion direction discrimination task was used to evaluate the EIN over a wide range of luminance intensities for various spatial and temporal frequencies when the display was blue or red (to which rods have little sensitivity). The target was either a Gabor patch presented at 20 degrees of eccentricity (first experiment) or a rotating sine-wave annulus with a radius of 10 degrees of eccentricity (second experiment). In both experiments, the EIN was found to be inversely proportional to luminance intensity over a limited range of luminance intensities for both display colors. At these luminance intensities, the EIN was roughly independent of the spatial and temporal frequencies, matching the properties of photon noise. Furthermore, under these conditions, contrast thresholds were lower (i.e., better) when the display was blue rather than red, which suggests that vision was mediated by rods when the display was blue. We conclude that the efficiency of rods to detect photons can be evaluated by measuring contrast thresholds in the presence and absence of visual noise over a limited range of luminance intensities with a blue display.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"25 2","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.2.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that the efficiency of cones to detect photons can be evaluated by measuring the equivalent input noise (EIN; derived from contrast thresholds measured in the presence and absence of visual noise) under specific conditions in which the contrast threshold is limited by the variability in the number of photons detected by photoreceptors (i.e., photon noise). These conditions can be identified based on the known properties of photon noise: spatially and temporally white and inversely proportional to the luminance intensity. The present study aims to adapt this psychophysical paradigm to evaluate the efficiency of rods to detect photons. A motion direction discrimination task was used to evaluate the EIN over a wide range of luminance intensities for various spatial and temporal frequencies when the display was blue or red (to which rods have little sensitivity). The target was either a Gabor patch presented at 20 degrees of eccentricity (first experiment) or a rotating sine-wave annulus with a radius of 10 degrees of eccentricity (second experiment). In both experiments, the EIN was found to be inversely proportional to luminance intensity over a limited range of luminance intensities for both display colors. At these luminance intensities, the EIN was roughly independent of the spatial and temporal frequencies, matching the properties of photon noise. Furthermore, under these conditions, contrast thresholds were lower (i.e., better) when the display was blue rather than red, which suggests that vision was mediated by rods when the display was blue. We conclude that the efficiency of rods to detect photons can be evaluated by measuring contrast thresholds in the presence and absence of visual noise over a limited range of luminance intensities with a blue display.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从心理物理角度测量杆状体的效率。
最近的研究表明,锥细胞探测光子的效率可以通过测量等效输入噪声(EIN;在特定条件下,对比度阈值由光感受器检测到的光子数量的可变性(即光子噪声)所限制(在存在和不存在视觉噪声的情况下)。这些条件可以根据光子噪声的已知性质来确定:空间和时间上的白色和与亮度强度成反比。本研究旨在采用这种心理物理范式来评估视杆细胞探测光子的效率。运动方向辨别任务被用来评估在各种空间和时间频率下,当显示为蓝色或红色时,在宽范围内的亮度强度下的EIN。目标是一个偏心率为20度的Gabor贴片(第一次实验)或一个半径为10度的旋转正弦波环空(第二次实验)。在这两个实验中,EIN都被发现在一个有限的亮度范围内与亮度强度成反比。在这些亮度强度下,EIN与时空频率基本无关,符合光子噪声的特性。此外,在这些条件下,当显示为蓝色而不是红色时,对比度阈值更低(即更好),这表明当显示为蓝色时,视觉是由杆状细胞介导的。我们得出的结论是,杆状体探测光子的效率可以通过测量在有限亮度范围内存在和不存在视觉噪声时的对比度阈值来评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
期刊最新文献
Asymmetries in hue percepts and early cortical color coding: Evidence from chromatic visual evoked potentials. Social wayfinding in virtual reality: Navigational decisions and eye movements in a dynamic environment. Saccades to spatially extended objects: The roles of observer goals and part-structure cues in determining within-object landing position. The development of object representations in children. Evaluating lawful relationships in saccadic eye movements with simulated vision impairment: A proof-of-concept study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1