Jennifer K. Quint , Sabada Dube , Lucy Carty , Renata Yokota , Samira Bell , Lance Turtle , Yi Lu , Kathryn Evans , Nahila Justo , Michelle Harley , Jurgens Peters , Carla Talarico , Richard McNulty , Ana Goios , Sylvia Taylor , Rachael A. Evans
{"title":"Immunocompromised individuals remain at risk of COVID-19: 2023 results from the observational INFORM study","authors":"Jennifer K. Quint , Sabada Dube , Lucy Carty , Renata Yokota , Samira Bell , Lance Turtle , Yi Lu , Kathryn Evans , Nahila Justo , Michelle Harley , Jurgens Peters , Carla Talarico , Richard McNulty , Ana Goios , Sylvia Taylor , Rachael A. Evans","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to characterise coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity, mortality and healthcare utilisation in immunocompromised individuals in England during 2023, using INFORM (INvestigation oF cOvid-19 Risk among iMmunocompromised populations) study data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Retrospective cohort study (ISRCTN53375662) using pseudonymised electronic health records of individuals aged ≥12 years from a random 25% sample of England’s population. Over 1 January–31 December 2023, adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs; adjusted for age, sex, non-immunocompromising comorbidities) between immunocompromised and non-immunocompromised individuals for COVID-19-related hospitalisation, death, and healthcare utilisation were estimated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Immunocompromised individuals represented 4.0% of 12,056,685 individuals studied but accounted for 21.7% and 21.9% of COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths, respectively. Risk of severe COVID-19 was elevated for immunocompromised vs. non-immunocompromised; aIRRs: 2.04, 95% CI 1.95–2.14 (COVID-19 hospitalisation); 1.69, 95% CI 1.53–1.87 (COVID-19 death). COVID-19 vaccination was more likely in immunocompromised vs. non-immunocompromised (≥4 doses 72.6% vs. 29.8%). The aIRRs for COVID-19-related general practitioner consultations and accident and emergency/day case visits were 2.26 (95% CI 2.22−2.29) and 3.02 (95% CI 2.84−3.20), respectively, for immunocompromised vs. non-immunocompromised.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Beyond three years since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, immunocompromised individuals remain disproportionately impacted from COVID-19 despite increased vaccination. These findings highlight a persistent need for additional COVID-19 interventions for immunocompromised populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":"90 3","pages":"Article 106432"},"PeriodicalIF":14.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016344532500026X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
We aimed to characterise coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity, mortality and healthcare utilisation in immunocompromised individuals in England during 2023, using INFORM (INvestigation oF cOvid-19 Risk among iMmunocompromised populations) study data.
Methods
Retrospective cohort study (ISRCTN53375662) using pseudonymised electronic health records of individuals aged ≥12 years from a random 25% sample of England’s population. Over 1 January–31 December 2023, adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs; adjusted for age, sex, non-immunocompromising comorbidities) between immunocompromised and non-immunocompromised individuals for COVID-19-related hospitalisation, death, and healthcare utilisation were estimated.
Results
Immunocompromised individuals represented 4.0% of 12,056,685 individuals studied but accounted for 21.7% and 21.9% of COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths, respectively. Risk of severe COVID-19 was elevated for immunocompromised vs. non-immunocompromised; aIRRs: 2.04, 95% CI 1.95–2.14 (COVID-19 hospitalisation); 1.69, 95% CI 1.53–1.87 (COVID-19 death). COVID-19 vaccination was more likely in immunocompromised vs. non-immunocompromised (≥4 doses 72.6% vs. 29.8%). The aIRRs for COVID-19-related general practitioner consultations and accident and emergency/day case visits were 2.26 (95% CI 2.22−2.29) and 3.02 (95% CI 2.84−3.20), respectively, for immunocompromised vs. non-immunocompromised.
Conclusions
Beyond three years since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, immunocompromised individuals remain disproportionately impacted from COVID-19 despite increased vaccination. These findings highlight a persistent need for additional COVID-19 interventions for immunocompromised populations.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Infection publishes original papers on all aspects of infection - clinical, microbiological and epidemiological. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in the ever-changing field of infection.
Each issue brings you Editorials that describe current or controversial topics of interest, high quality Reviews to keep you in touch with the latest developments in specific fields of interest, an Epidemiology section reporting studies in the hospital and the general community, and a lively correspondence section.