Assessment of the application of technology acceptance measures to older drivers’ acceptance of advanced driver-assistance systems

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Applied Ergonomics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104474
Abigail Hansen , Kim Kiely , Tuki Attuquayefio , Diane Hosking , Michael Regan , Ranmalee Eramudugolla , Lesley A. Ross , Kaarin J. Anstey
{"title":"Assessment of the application of technology acceptance measures to older drivers’ acceptance of advanced driver-assistance systems","authors":"Abigail Hansen ,&nbsp;Kim Kiely ,&nbsp;Tuki Attuquayefio ,&nbsp;Diane Hosking ,&nbsp;Michael Regan ,&nbsp;Ranmalee Eramudugolla ,&nbsp;Lesley A. Ross ,&nbsp;Kaarin J. Anstey","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Older adults’ road safety is a concern given the ageing population and increasing numbers of licensed older drivers. Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems (ADAS) are designed to improve safety, however little is known about the relationship between ADAS use and its trust and acceptance in older adults. The purpose of this study was to assesses an instrument of older driver acceptance of and trust in ADAS.</div><div>A survey distributed to 1008 older Australian drivers (M = 72.1, SD = 6.94) found there was an overwhelmingly positive attitude towards ADAS, however trust in the systems were low and drivers had concerns with privacy, safety and failure of the systems. The Partial Automation Acceptance Scale was validated, producing a four-factor model measuring attitudes towards ADAS, attitudes towards technology, trust and perceptions on risk. Multiple regression showed three of the four factors predict use of ADAS, providing preliminary evidence of the validity and reliability of the scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 104474"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025000109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Older adults’ road safety is a concern given the ageing population and increasing numbers of licensed older drivers. Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems (ADAS) are designed to improve safety, however little is known about the relationship between ADAS use and its trust and acceptance in older adults. The purpose of this study was to assesses an instrument of older driver acceptance of and trust in ADAS.
A survey distributed to 1008 older Australian drivers (M = 72.1, SD = 6.94) found there was an overwhelmingly positive attitude towards ADAS, however trust in the systems were low and drivers had concerns with privacy, safety and failure of the systems. The Partial Automation Acceptance Scale was validated, producing a four-factor model measuring attitudes towards ADAS, attitudes towards technology, trust and perceptions on risk. Multiple regression showed three of the four factors predict use of ADAS, providing preliminary evidence of the validity and reliability of the scale.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术接受措施在老年驾驶员接受先进驾驶辅助系统方面的应用评估。
鉴于人口老龄化和持有驾照的老年司机数量不断增加,老年人的道路安全问题令人担忧。高级驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)旨在提高安全性,然而,我们对ADAS的使用与老年人对其的信任和接受程度之间的关系知之甚少。本研究的目的是评估老年驾驶员对ADAS的接受度和信任度。一项针对1008名澳大利亚老年司机(M = 72.1, SD = 6.94)的调查发现,绝大多数人对ADAS持积极态度,但对该系统的信任度较低,司机对隐私、安全和系统故障感到担忧。对部分自动化接受度量表进行了验证,产生了一个四因素模型,测量对ADAS的态度、对技术的态度、信任和对风险的看法。多元回归显示,四个因素中有三个预测了ADAS的使用,为量表的效度和信度提供了初步证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
期刊最新文献
Eyes on the mission: Mixed methods assessment of eye-tracker-enabled interactive decision support in a simulated unmanned aerial vehicle system Guilty until proven innocent: Experiencing errors in training promotes relationship equity and trust calibration Perceived safety during human-robot interaction with an autonomous mobile robot Effects of anticipatory auditory cues and non-driving related tasks on motion sickness in automated vehicles Automated vehicle's human-machine interfaces design with haptic feedback: A meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1