A strategy to increase identification of patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Application of the Simon Broome lipid criteria in a large-scale retrospective analysis

IF 4.3 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American journal of preventive cardiology Pub Date : 2025-01-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.100930
James K. Fleming , Renee M. Sullivan , David Alfego , Natalia T. Leach , Tamara J. Richman , Jill Rafalko
{"title":"A strategy to increase identification of patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Application of the Simon Broome lipid criteria in a large-scale retrospective analysis","authors":"James K. Fleming ,&nbsp;Renee M. Sullivan ,&nbsp;David Alfego ,&nbsp;Natalia T. Leach ,&nbsp;Tamara J. Richman ,&nbsp;Jill Rafalko","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.100930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a primarily autosomal dominant condition characterized by markedly elevated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c) and an increased risk of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Though early identification and treatment are crucial to optimizing outcomes, few laboratory strategies exist to detect FH.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All lipid tests for total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-c ordered through a large nation-wide network of medical laboratories in the United States (US) from 2018 - 2022 were retrospectively evaluated using a decision tree algorithm based on Simon Broome lipid criteria. If thresholds were met, results were classified as “possible FH” or as “no lipid evidence of FH” if not met.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The review of 121,141,307 lipid panels and associated genetic tests from 58,400,105 patients resulted in 1,843,966 (3.2 %) that were classified as “possible FH”. Overall, the mean TC was higher in females than males, particularly in those ≥16 years. LDL-c in the “no lipid evidence of FH” cohort increased year-over-year; LDL-c was stable or decreased in the “possible FH” cohort. Despite the large number of patients classified with “possible FH”, very few (0.02 %) matched patients had genetic testing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A laboratory-developed algorithm using Simon Broome lipid criteria can help identify patients who may benefit from additional FH evaluation. While critical, testing hyperlipidemic children for FH is grossly underutilized, as is genetic testing for FH. Diagnostic laboratories are uniquely positioned to bring FH to the attention of clinicians, with the goal of earlier diagnosis, cascade testing, and appropriate treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100930"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787606/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667725000030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a primarily autosomal dominant condition characterized by markedly elevated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c) and an increased risk of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Though early identification and treatment are crucial to optimizing outcomes, few laboratory strategies exist to detect FH.

Methods

All lipid tests for total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-c ordered through a large nation-wide network of medical laboratories in the United States (US) from 2018 - 2022 were retrospectively evaluated using a decision tree algorithm based on Simon Broome lipid criteria. If thresholds were met, results were classified as “possible FH” or as “no lipid evidence of FH” if not met.

Results

The review of 121,141,307 lipid panels and associated genetic tests from 58,400,105 patients resulted in 1,843,966 (3.2 %) that were classified as “possible FH”. Overall, the mean TC was higher in females than males, particularly in those ≥16 years. LDL-c in the “no lipid evidence of FH” cohort increased year-over-year; LDL-c was stable or decreased in the “possible FH” cohort. Despite the large number of patients classified with “possible FH”, very few (0.02 %) matched patients had genetic testing.

Conclusion

A laboratory-developed algorithm using Simon Broome lipid criteria can help identify patients who may benefit from additional FH evaluation. While critical, testing hyperlipidemic children for FH is grossly underutilized, as is genetic testing for FH. Diagnostic laboratories are uniquely positioned to bring FH to the attention of clinicians, with the goal of earlier diagnosis, cascade testing, and appropriate treatment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of preventive cardiology
American journal of preventive cardiology Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
期刊最新文献
Under-recognized cardiovascular risk enhancers in women: A call to rethink clinical assessment on risk stratification Unhealthy alcohol use and risk of coronary heart disease among young and middle-aged adults Impact of payer rejections and out-of-pocket costs on patient access to bempedoic acid therapy Inflammatory markers and calcification of coronary arteries, aorta and cardiac valves: Findings from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study Composite cardiovascular risk factor control in US adults with diabetes and relation to social determinants of health: The All of Us research program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1